No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.12, No.
○Chairman (Urahideo) attendees have reached the fixed number. Open today's meeting. --- --- ---
△Report
○President (Urahideo-kun) Various reports are printed on the original. ---。。 Report No.2 July 1, 2009 1. The following report was submitted from the Audit Committee. 1Audit Committee Report No.13 (March 2009) 2Audit Committee Report No.14 (March 2009)
△Date No.1 Proposal No.71
△Date No.5 No.11 Report
○President (Demand of Urahi) We will collectively make five agenda from the Proposal No. 1 of the 71 to the Report No. 5 of the Day. We will ask for a review report of the General Affairs Committee. ---。報告書 June 26, 2009 Sasebo City Council Chairman Hideo Ura, General Affairs Chairman Teruo Takamura General Affairs Committee Judgment Report The incident was decided as follows, so we will report it according to Article 20 of the Sasebo City Council Regulations. No. 1 Proposal No. 71 Sasebo City Land Acquisition Project Special Accounting Correction Budget (No. 1) 2 Proposal No. 72 Partial amendments to Sasebo City Tax Ordinances and all of the original proposals were determined. Report No.2 Report No.2 Report No.5 Report No.11 Report No.5 Report No.11 Report No.11 Report No.11 of the Annual General Accounting Compensation Budget (No.6) Report No.4 Report No.10 of the Annual General Accounting Compensation Report No.5 Report No.11 of Article No.11 of the Sasebo City Tax Ordinance to Amend Part of Ordinance --- --- ---
◆General Affairs Committee (Tetsuo Takamura) (Venue) First of all, the 71st Proposal for Sasebo City Land Acquisition Project Special Accounting Correction Budget (No. 1), but there is a total of 7,270 million yen for purchase of neighboring land for the expansion of Tomei Junior High School facilities. The number of brushes is 4,842 square meters. There is a description that "the landlords and the present situation are negatively affected by the rice field, and the landlords are three". In the committee, "Does it be necessary to put a negative effect?" In addition, if it is necessary, it is doubted that the order part is included in the planned acquisition area. I need to attach another brush, but I have a reply saying that I have not confirmed whether the attached part is included in this acquisition area. In addition, there is a question that “Is it clear about the requirements of related laws such as agriculture and land law?” from the authorities, “I did not understand as a financial department, but when I confirmed it to the educational committee, the public facility was not necessary to手続 or transfer farmland.” In response, a member pointed out that he shouldn’t be aware of it as a financial department, and the authorities said, “The acquisition of the land is a financial department that provides special accounting for land acquisition business, so we should understand the progress.” In addition, there is a question that "the area of 4,842 square meters of acquisition is the area on the registry?" from the authorities, "the area on the registry is the area on the registry, but there is a approximate amount because the misuse is筆d, but the area does not change because it is calculated based on the drawing etc." In addition, at the time of return to the site, there is a question from the authorities that "I would like to discuss the compensation with the land improvement zone" because the land improvement zone is not burdened by the installation of a malfunction. In addition, there is a question that the consent of the land improvement zone is increasing on the end of the rainwater drainage of the junior high school, which is a public facility, is increasing. Although the above is an overview of the examinations, we carefully examine and examine local refugees, and we decided to make a draft decision in a match with all parties, as a result of the completion of the審査. Next, partial amendments to the Proposal No. 72 Sasebo City Tax Ordinance, but with partial amendments to the Regional Tax Act, the手続ling procedure for the reduction of fixed asset tax for long-term excellent housing. In the committee, the impact on the city tax revenue by the amendment of this Ordinance, the authorities have answered, “There are cases where specific calculations from the country, model cases, etc. are not shown, and it is not possible to create simulations as this city, but as aシミュレーションal value.” The committee decided to make a draft decision in the match of the whole meeting. Next, the report of the consolidation of the Sasebo City General Accounting Correction Budget (No.6) in the 20th year of the report of the second report, but the addition and modification of the local bond due to the settlement of the city bond on March 31, 2009, is confined in。 with the provisions of Article 179 of the Regional Autonomous Law. The Committee does not recognize the reasons for adding or changing the Committee. There is a question of “whether you should not submit the material for a b reason explanation”, and the authorities said, “It is not possible to submit because it is not summarized as a material for the reason for the increase or decrease, but in the future, I would like to submit the deliberation material.” The committee decided to approve the results of the decision. Secondly, we decided to approve the description of the authorities and approve the agreement with all parties for more than two cases of the report of the当局 Disposal of the報告 Disposal of the Article 10 part of the Sasebo City Tax Ordinance. Close the report.
○Chairperson (Mr. Urahide) I will enter a question about the report of the current chairperson. Frequently Questions More discussions. Follow the discussion. We will collect five items from the Proposal No.71 to the No.11. Is there any object to the resolution and approval as the original proposal? (There is no objection) Accordingly, more than five were approved and approved as the original. --- --- ---
△Date 6 Proposal 68
△Date No. 9 Up to the Proposal No. 78
○Chairperson (Demand of Urahi) Next, we will make a total agenda of four items from the 6th 68th resolution to the 9th 78th resolution. We will ask for a review report of the Chair of the City Maintenance Committee. ---。報告書 As of June 25, 2009, Mr. Kazuo Ura, Chair of the Council of Sasebo City, Katsushi Otsuka, Review Report of the Urban Development Committee. The incident is determined as follows, and the report is based on Article 20 of the Sasebo City Council Regulations. Proposal No. 68: Partial amendments to Sasebo City Fee Ordinances No. 74: Partial amendments to Sasebo City Disaster Risk Areas No. 4 Proposal No. 78 Approval and abolishment of City Roads No. 78, both approved the original proposal. --- --- ---
◆Chairperson of Urban Development (Katsumi Otsuka) (Venue) We will report the outline and results of the examination for each project attached to this committee. First of all, the 68th Agenda Sasebo City Housing Business Special Accounting Supplementary Budget (No. 1) is calculated by the reimbursement expenses for the overlaid of the municipal housing rent 1271 million yen. In regard to this proposal, there is a apology from the authorities at the beginning of the examination, as a result of an error in the method of calculation of rent, the rent was overlaid from the target household. The Committee has just changed the rent calculation and the arithmetic part of the Heisei 10 year, which is the家賃 of the rent overlaid, and the arithmetic part of the arithmetic unit was calculated by the legal limit method that reflects the amount equivalent to the subsidy of the country from the construction cost of the public housing to the rent. , , , etc. have been calculated including various meter boxes such as balcony, water, pipe shaft, etc., which are not included in the residential area, so it has become an overlaid state. In the past 10 years, we decided to find out that the rent was collected as the arithmetic error. After confirming the concept of the shared part in the country and the prefecture, we found that the meter box and the pipe shaft are included in the common part. In the first place, when changing the rent calculation, there is a response saying "I would like to receive the common part clearly as a counter for the future". Next, among the 1,833 households, 688 households that have already been re。ed have been treated as households that the household owner has died, the authorities said, “Now, 89 households who have died, and 10 households who do not know how to go. If the household owner is lost, he/ will investigate such as acquiring a family register, and will pay a refund to the heir. If you don’t know how to do it, we have a response saying, “I would like to consider the method of investigation in the future.” In the future, we decided to reinforce the check system in close cooperation with the country and the prefecture, and to make a request to prevent recurrence. As part of the revision of the Sasebo City Fee Ordinance in the Proposal No. 73, the fee for the examination of the certification examination of the long-term excellent housing construction etc. plan is set forth in審査 with the law on promoting the smoothing of the elderly, disabled, etc., as part of the revision of the Building Standard Act. In addition, as part of the amendment of the Ordinance on the designation of the 74th Sasebo City Disaster Risk Area, the governor of Nagasaki Prefecture shall not apply the Ordinance on the designation of the Sasebo City Disaster Risk Area for the special warning area and the special warning area of the Sasebo City Disaster. Next, the市reditation and disco、ation of the City Road of Proposal No. 78 shall be認定redited by the provisions of Paragraph 2 of Article 8 of the Road Act, Route 12 and 4 other lines of Proposal No. 78. The Committee has decided to make a draft decision with the agreement of the authorities. Close the report.
○Chairperson (Mr. Urahide) I will enter a question about the report of the current chairperson. Frequently Questions More discussions. 36th Senshu Yama。.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama。) (Lecture) The 68th Proposal will be discussed against the Sasebo City Housing Business Special Accounting Correction Budget (No.1). It is a correction to return to the citizens of 1,833 households with the total rent of 1,279,000 yen for municipal housing that was accidentally collected. Why? What was the basis for the proportion of the burden that the property source was 5,816 million yen from the housing fund and 4,454 million yen from the general accounting? Why? This was well understood by the previous chairperson report, such as lessons to be consumed, and measures to prevent recurrence. However, it is very important to have a problem that the government has been avoided if it is properly, such as causing damage to 1,833 households, and the possibility that it can not be recovered to all if it is now. End the discussion.
○Chairperson (Urahideo) In addition, the first proposal of No. 68 will be determined by the Sasebo City Housing Business Special Accounting Supplementary Budget (No. 1). We will ask for the 立 of a member who agrees to make a decision according to the original draft. It is a large number of成s. Therefore, this issue was decided as the original. Next, we will collect three proposals from the Proposal No.73 to the Proposal No.78. Is there any objection to make the decision as the original? (There is no objection) Therefore, the above three were decided as the original. --- --- ---
△Date 10 Proposal of Issue 69
△S ule 20 Up to 33
○President (Deo Urahi) Next, 11 proposals from the 10th 69th to the 20th petition of the date will be a collective agenda. We will ask for a judging report of the Board of Education. ---21報告書 Heisei 21 years 6 month 26 day Sasebo City Council Chairman Hideo Ura, Chairman of the Board of Education, Sasebo City Council, Sasebo City Council, Sasebo City Council, Sasebo City Council, Article 78 paragraph 1 report. Proposal No. 69 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 5 No. 80 Appointment No. 80 Appointment No. 81 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 79 Appointment No. 80 Appointment No. 7 Report No.12 Report of the Annual General Meeting on Ordinances to Amend Part of Sasebo City National Health Insurance Ordinances8 Report No.13 Report of the Annual General Meeting on the Con of a Contract for Construction (Change Agreement) Both of these reports were。redited. 9 petition No. 31 Decision to adopt opinions that require “non-nuclear Japan Declaration” No. 33 of petition No. 10 of the petition to request abolishment of the medical system for the latter term. 11 Proposal No. 76 Decision Determined the original case of the establishment of an ordinance to abolish Sasebo City Traffic Disaster Cooperative Ordinance and Sasebo City Fire Cooperative Ordinance. --- --- ---
◆President of the Board of Education (Seiko Matsumoto) (Presen。) First of all, it is about the special accounting compensation budget (No. 1) of the National Health Insurance Project in Sasebo City, 2009, but as a child-rearing support project, the increase in childbirth and child-rearing expenses from 380,000 yen to 420,000 yen, the addition of contributions to the elderly health care system, and the addition of support money for the late elderly are recorded. At the conclusion of the committee, "This proposal contains a correction budget that financially supports the latter-stage elderly medical system, so it is not possible to compliment". The revision of the regulations of the National Health Insurance Ordinances of Sasebo City, the 12th report is based on the provisions of Article 179 of the Local Autonomous Law. At the conclusion of the committee, we decided to approve with a large number of成s, as a result of the vote. In addition, we decided to confirm the resolution and approval of all parties for the proposals of No. 70 to No. 81 and No. 13. Next, we have reviewed the request for abolishment of the medical system for the elderly in the late 31st year of the petition. In conclusion, this system is a medical discri for persons over the age of 75 and under the age of 74. For example, if you are over the age of 75, insurance is not applied only to certain parts, and if you seek further medical or medication, insurance will not apply. In addition, even in case of hospitalization, it is a mechanism that encourages people who are 75 years old or older to leave the hospital from a medical institution. In this way, discriminating a person is infringing on fundamental human rights, and it is not absolutely allowed, the system should be abolished, and there was a debate that "approve this adoption", but the result of the vote is decided to be unappropriate in a minority. Next, it is a petition for the adoption of opinions requesting the “non-nuclear Japan Declaration” of the petition No. 33, but we carefully reviewed it by the petition. The Committee concluded that the Japanese government has made a decision on the five nuclear army contracts in the United Nations last year. In addition, it is a situation that does not oblige the three non-nuclear principles. Japan is a nuclear weapon abolishment, and a large flow is that nuclear weapons, which are human sadness, can be eliminated from the earth, and all governments in the A-bombed prefecture, demanding the government to do this non-nuclear Japan declaration, have been strongly demanded. Lastly, there are cases of the establishment of regulations to abolish Sasebo City Traffic Disaster Cooperative Ordinance and Sasebo City Fire Cooperative Ordinance. However, both businesses are disco。ed at the end of21 year 2009, and the amendments to related ordinances are made. The Committee has made a decision on the validity of public involvement and financial measures for the decommissioning of the business, and “the validity of public involvement has been reduced by 20% due to the enhancement of voluntary liability insurance, increased voluntary insurance coverage, and the spread of private insurance and life cooperatives. In addition, the labor costs in this co-、ed business were initially covered by special accounting, but since4 2017, it has become a situation that must be met in general accounting. However, this cooperative project has been established as a member mutual support project, and there is a problem because of the fairness of the public expenses burden on the business of a particular subscriber. In order to believe that it is necessary to cover the membership fee of the cooperative business, there is a response saying that it is stated as a decommissioning reason. Next, at this meeting, the authorities discussed the reason why the proposal was exceeded, and eventually, the decision was concluded in the Management Strategy Conference in February 21. In addition, we usually have a reply to the request for the next会 year, since we have been working on the office from September, we suggested to the last regular meeting. In addition, the status of surveys to citizens concerning the abolition of the system was negotiated, “We conducted a survey of 3,000 citizens at an external review committee consisting of 5 years ago, but this time, there was a response to 23 people in traffic relations, such as the Chairman of the Union Town and the Committee of the Traffic Disaster Judgment. In addition, we carefully examined the use of the residual funds, the possibility of transition to private insurance companies, etc., and the efforts to improve the membership rate so far. Although the above is an overview of the examination, the committee cannot convince the members of the committee to disco e the traffic and fire cooperative business from the perspective of public engagement and financial。. In addition, it is not possible to consider the impact of both businesses. Furthermore, in April 2004, it was desirable to continue the business in a report issued by the Sasebo City Traffic Disaster and other cooperative business review committee. After that, the management status from17 2005 to19 2007 is black, and the validity of business abolition is lacking. Accordingly, we decided to conduct a co ation review with the purpose of "to examine how much the social weakness is used and to consider whether there is an alternative method when the two business is disco ed, and immediately voted. Next, in the discussion, the system was inexpensive due to the report issued by the Sasebo City Traffic Disasters and other cooperative business review committee in 2004. The result was that the conclusion that it would be better to survive as a result of a positive opinion, such as a very serious and attractive system for the social weaknesses in the accident. In addition, 80% of the surveys we conducted in the previous stage are requested to survive. In addition, 23 members, including the Chairman of the Union Town Association, wish to remain 43% and 57% of the abolition, even after the results of the survey were confirmed. Although there is such an actual situation, the reason for decommissioning the validity of public involvement is very weak. If this system is disco。ed, it is good for people who can join private insurance, but there are people who can not join it, and it is not possible to cut off. The abolition of this system was a degradation of civil service, and there was a discussion that the proposal could not agree. On the other hand, more than 40 years have passed since the establishment of the system, and the environment of the舞 system has changed greatly from the beginning. There is a tendency to decrease the subscriber. In order to promote administrative reforms, there was a debate that "appropriate to this proposal" because the need for public involvement is low. Close the report.
○Chairperson (Mr. Urahide) I will enter a question about the report of the current chairperson. Frequently Questions More discussions. Atsushi 26th.
◆No.26 (Atsushi Habumi) We will discuss the76position of Article 76 of the Proposal of Sasebo City Traffic Disaster Cooperative Ordinances and Ordinances to abolish Sasebo City Fire Cooperative Ordinances. In the report issued by the Sasebo City Traffic Disaster and other Cooperative Business Review Committee in 2004, this system is an inexpensive membership fee, and it is a system that is easy to apply and attractive, so if you look at the questionnaire survey results, there were 1,234 responses for 3,000 citizens. In December of last year, almost half of the people want to survive even the results of hearing surveys such as the Chairman of the Union Town as I mentioned earlier. In16 with the tendency to decrease the subscriber’s decline, traffic accidents cooperative世帯 are about 5,000,900 people, and fire cooperative households are about 9,800 households, but some opinions are not reflected in the same questionnaire and opinions as in16 2004. The reason for decommissioning of the need for public involvement in the absence of concrete verification is not to say that the basis is very rare. Therefore, the abolition of this system is opposite to the Proposal 76 because it is directly connected to the decline of civil service. More
○Chairman Takara Wada 8
◆No. 8 (Takaku Wada) (Lecture) An opinion from the standpoint of acclaiming the matter of deprecating Sasebo City Traffic Disaster Cooperative Ordinance and Sasebo City Fire Cooperative Ordinance. The traffic accident rehabilitation system has been 42 years since its founding and 27 years have passed since the fire rehabilitation system, and it is true that it has been a kind of relief to加入 and has played a constant role in the stability of victims and citizens’ lives. In the meantime, the expansion of the insurance system for automobile damages is se tially, and the security and舞 system for citizens to prepare for accidents, fires, etc. It is said that the environment changes greatly from the establishment of the cooperative system to the present, and there are various choices in private systems.交通 the improvement of the system in order to increase the number of加入, the amount of市の to the population of the city has decreased for 28 years. Therefore, it is a situation in which it is impossible to judge that it is not expected to maintain and increase the subscriber in the future. In addition, the general accounting is responsible for the labor costs that should be covered in this special account since4 2017, and this situation is difficult to say that proper financial management is made. In this way, there is a privatized alternative, and the measures that the need to be involved in the city have to be seen from the viewpoint of promoting administrative reform of the city, and it is praised for the abolition ordinance for such reasons. More
○Chairperson (Urahideo) Sennyo Yama。, 36.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama。) (Lecture) First, we will discuss the69position to the Sasebo City National Health Insurance Business Special Accounting Correction Budget (No.1). In the medical care expenses burden, the support fee for the elderly in the latter period is JPY 48,000. However, the latter-aged medical system should be abolished, which discriminates the elderly who are over 75 years old and pushes a heavy burden, and the医療enditure from the National Health Special Account cannot be accepted. opposite. Next, we will discuss a partial amendment of Sasebo City National Health Insurance Ordinance. With partial amendments to the health insurance law enforcement regulations, the childbirth and childbirth will be withdrawn from 350,000 yen to 330,000 yen. In FY2009, 200 people are expected in half a year. From the23 year 2011, the total of about 40 million yen will be supported by about 1,000 people. It is valuable. However, it is very unfortunate that until 2011. Why is it limited to two and a half years? It is common that criticisms such as rosem occur. However, this period is very important for the target. Next, it is opposite to the report of the recent報告ling of the regulations that amend part of the Sasebo National Health Insurance Ordinance. This is to raise the tax limit of 100,000 yen. More tax burdens you want to bear. The authorities explain that the burden of low-income people will be heavy. The Sasebo City Government household composition itself is the current state that 80% of low-income individuals of 2 million yen or less are composed. The problem is that if you ask for tax increase under the framework that the national insurance burden is reduced, it is necessary to be a discussion that deepens the conflict between the national insurance household. If you stop to reduce the burden of the nation, or you can’t do that, there is a fund of more than 10 billion yen, so you shouldn’t push any more tax even if you get this outbreak. Even if there is a politics of the country, it is necessary to demonstrate the role of local governments to protect citizens' lives. In addition, it is important that you are allowed to carry out devoted disposal to push the tax increase. opposite. Next, we will discuss the76position of the Articles of Incorporation of the Sasebo City Traffic Disaster Cooperative Ordinance and the Ordinance to abolish the Sasebo City Fire Cooperative Ordinance. In 2004, the review committee responds to the following questions regarding the future operation of these cooperative systems. What kind of opinion did you hear? It is attractive that the membership fee is 500 yen per year. It is a system that is difficult for people who suffer from an accident. If you have a traffic accident, you may not have any insurance. Although the subscriber is decreasing, one-quarter of citizens is joining in FY2002.アンケート 80% of citizens wish to survive the system. Cheap and constant security It is highly valuable for the elderly who are likely to have a certain limit on life-hardened persons and insurance coverage. We have received positive opinions such as above, and as a result of the review, it is better to survive without disco ing the system, and we are responding that this conclusion has reached. We have summarized the report that it has reached the conclusion that it is desirable to continue business without abolishment. However, the discussion report of the庁y Committee is to ignore the opinions of such citizen questionnaires and review committees at all, and there is a decommissioning conclusion from the beginning, and it is a really 論理ent logic to decompose. I can not feel the warmth of the government. What do you say? It does not give市民s directly to citizens. When an accident occurs, there is no舞. It is the same position as general citizens. It is not to throw away the weaker. Some people may not take insurance. In addition, the authorities say that even if all of the people involved in a voluntary and voluntary insurance, they do not have insurance immediately. In addition to the benefits, there is a system to raise welfare funds. In order to compliment the current private insurance, there are many products depending on the cl , and a single content can be selected from the Sasebo Fire System, and it is said that it is a fact that it is recommended to join private insurance. It is not necessary to say whether it came from Sasebo city to business of private insurance company. It is possible to solve problems of labor costs and efforts to raise the subscription rate. It is the most practical and educational effect for children, which is not a warm human society, which can remedy social weaknesses when problems occur. It is opposite to the abolition. Next, we will discuss the request for the abolition of the medical care system for the latter half of the application 31. The final report has been announced by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare of M添zo. Although it was a final report, it was not possible to make a review proposal. As a result, government parties are expected to forward the drafting of this review plan after the fall. In response to the severe voices of the people, the fundamental criticism of the system was emerged in this review meeting that began last fall. The people, however, may want a very radical reform, or a reform that can take the system itself, or if you name this system, you will be asked to say that it is a medical system for people over 75 years and people with disabilities. However, the government agreement established by the public in the inauguration of the Aso Cabinet was a major premise to improve the medical system for the elderly. It is one of the major causes that the examiner did not know the conclusion. Only the name of the late elderly and the end-of-life consultation support fee is stated that the final report is known to be “Sightseeing”. The name of the late elderly and the end-of-life consultation support fee is the dignity of the elderly. However, the dignity of the elderly is a medical care system for the elderly whose dignity is in医療 with the medical insurance of the separate frame separated by age. For example, insurance premiums rise every two years due to the rise in population ratio of late elderly people. As long as the system is prolonged, uninterrupted burdens attack the people. It is a plan to realize a heavy burden to the elderly, to restrict examination, medication, surgery, and to prevent multiple medical examinations. Insurance card acquisition is also a big problem. In the medical system of the late elderly, if the insurance premium is paid for more than one year, the insurance card is taken up and cut into the certificate. In such a case, you must pay the full medical fee at the counter, so you will not be taken to the doctor. In the previous senior health system, older than 75 years old were not covered by insurance card. In this regard, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare of M添zo responded to the national meeting that it is not treated to cold, such as having a certificate of qualification, because the deadline came to a hike ruler. If you are observing both the answer and the name, you should change the system itself. There is no significance to the introduction of this system with the conventional elderly health system. The opinion that the elderly health system was able to do quite well in the study meeting. The problem is that the burden of the country has been reduced by割 10%. It is necessary to establish a medical system that is not discrim by age and income to reduce the burden of the elderly, and to reduce the burden of the elderly. Contact Us Next, we will discuss the application for the proposal of the proposal for the proposal of the “Non-nuclear Japan Declaration”. On June 2, Mr. Kensaburo Oe, who was a lecture in Tokyo, said: "I thought that there was no nuclear abortion before I die." Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. I think with the feelings of joy. Mr. Oe feels like this, the Obama theory is changing the flow of the world. This is because the world’s leading leader in nuclear powerhouses gave a revolutionary speech to show the perspective of nuclear abolition. Make nuclear weapon abolishment to the United States. U.S.A. is human and moral responsibility as a country using nuclear weapons. The U.S. strives to fulfill its moral responsibilities, but we would like to cooperate with other countries. International cooperation for nuclear weapon abolition In fact, the Global Zero Committee, founded by former president of Carter, former President of Gorbachov and the world’s prominent people, has announced the action plan to zero nuclear weapons by 2030. A major change to abolishment will occur. We are looking forward to seeing you soon. The only role of the Japanese government affected is definitively important. However, the Japanese government has adopted this double standard for nuclear deterrent in actual behavior, as it is said to be abortion in the mouth. It is a resolution to start negotiating the nuclear disco、ation in the real UN, and also the resolution of the convention of nuclear weapons, even though these were adopted by the overwhelming majority, the Japanese government has taken this attitude to dispose of these decisions. We are stubbornly opposed to legally binding legalization, while observing the three non-nuclear principles. The nuclear affiliation document has been dis ed by the U.S. Information Disclosure Law and its presence has been published. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan has witnessed the existence of both yesterday and the real name. The media is also an editorial, and the presence is no longer doubtful. Even though there is a deep suspicion, there is no need to do the investigation, the Japanese government is an attitude to deceive the Toruo people. It is also the Sasebo City Council, which is located in the second district city of A-bomb, and the Sasebo City Council, which is located just inside the nuclear suspicion. The Sasebo City Council should be required to the government for a non-nuclear position. I agree with the request.
○Chairperson (Urahideo) In addition, we will first issue the 69th issue of Sasebo City National Health Insurance Business Special Accounting Supplementary Budget (No. 1). We will ask for the 立 of a member who agrees to make a decision according to the original draft. It is a large number of成s. Therefore, this issue was decided as the original. Next, we will collect two proposals of Proposal No. 70 and Proposal No. 75. Is there any objection to make a decision? (There is no objection) Therefore, the above two were decided as the original. Next, we are determined to establish a case to abolish the Sasebo City Traffic Disaster Cooperative Ordinance and Sasebo City Fire Cooperative Ordinance. We will ask for the 立 of a member who agrees to make a decision according to the original draft. It is a large number of成s. Therefore, this issue was decided as the original. Next, we will collect three proposals from the Proposal 79 to the Proposal 81. Is there any objection to make the decision as the original? (There is no objection) Therefore, the above three were decided as the original. Next, we will grant a report on the recent報告ling of the regulations that amend part of the Sasebo National Health Insurance Ordinance. We will ask for the launch of a member who agrees to approve it. It is a large number of成s. This is approved. Next, we will issue the 13th report. Is there any objection to approval? (There is no objection) This is approved. Next, we will grant a petition requesting the abolition of the medical system for the latter half of the application No. 31. We will ask for the 立 of a member who agrees to adopt it. It is a small number of成s. Therefore, we decided that this issue is not accepted. Next, we will grant a petition for the adoption of opinions that require the “non-nuclear Japan Declaration”. We will ask for the 立 of a member who agrees to adopt it. It is a small number of成s. Therefore, we decided that this issue is not accepted. --- --- ---
△From the Proposal No.21 of Schedule No.21
△Date No.24 Application No.32
○President (Deo Urahi) Next, we will make a total agenda of four items from the 21st77 proposal to the 24th32 request. We will ask for a review report of the Chairman of the Corporate Economics. ---21報告書 Heisei 21 years 6 month 26 day Sasebo City Council Chairman Hideo Ura Chairman Tetsushi Omura Corporate Economic Committee Review Report The incident was decided as follows, so we will report it according to Article 20 of Sasebo City Council Regulations and Article 78 1 of Sasebo City Council Regulations. Note 1 Proposal No.77 The original proposal has been approved for partial amendments to Sasebo City’s Ike and other maintenance business subcontractors. 2 Report No.14 Approval of the report on the consolidation of the consolidation of the construction contract (change contract) (construction of the West Sea Pearl Sea Center Aquarium). 3 Application No. 30 Request for submission of opinions for the proactive development of forest, forestry and wood industry measures. ---21委員会 Heisei 21 years 6 month 26 day Sasebo City Council Chairman Hideo Ura Chairman Tetsushi Omura Corporate Economic Committee Co、ing Examination Statement This committee decided that the case during the examination will be subject to the provisions of Article 21 of the Sasebo City Council Regulation. Note 1 Application No. 32 "Cooperative法 Law (tentative name)" for further consideration. --- --- ---
◆The chairperson of the Corporate Economic Committee (Tetsushi Omura) (lecture) First of all, a partial amendment of the 池 maintenance business subcontract collection ordinance for Sasebo City proposed in the77 issue, but the amendment of this article will be set up as a land improvement project in Nagasaki Prefecture, so it will be added as a business that collects dividends from local beneficiaries. According to the explanation of the authorities, the city was 7.5%, and the beneficiary was 15%, based on the city subsidy criteria. However, the government’s guidelines were shown to adopt the business, and the government’s guidance was also provided, so the city’s burden rate was increased from 7.5% to 10% and the beneficiary burden was reduced from 15% to 12.5%. This project is a reinvestment project that aims to advance the production base, as it is said to be "reinforced" based on the adoption criteria. On the other hand, considering the current situation where the un実施ed district of the Hoba maintenance remains, it is said that the beneficiary of this business is asked to pay the burden of the first. In the committee, the government has decided to make a certain decision as a city in consideration of the point of reinvestment of the land inガイドライン with the guidelines of the country. In response, the members are reinvestment of the city as well as beneficiaries. In addition, if you add the business as a business that collects dividends to the regulations, it is not possible to make the same 10% burden to unite with other business. By changing the local burden rate from 12.5% to 10%, it is difficult to make 10% because it is not possible to deny the possibility of delaying the business of the prefecture. Next, before the Ordinance amendment, we have justified the validity of consultation with beneficiaries using the assumed burden rate, and the authorities can make the city’s Ordinance amendment for the first time with the pre。ural Ordinance amendment, and the pre。ural government has also agreed to the country to confirm the business plan and amend the Ordinance. In the future, we have a response saying "I would like to consider the procedures for revisions to ordinances". In order to ensure that local farmers do not make利益s, we should review the procedures, including how to specify the burden rate of the shareholding, including whether it is the best way to proceed with the land improvement method. Although the above is an overview of the examination, the committee decided to make a decision to make a draft in a match, as a result of the completion of the decision. In the case of the construction of the Nishikai Pearl Sea Center Aquarium, the price of steel materials was increased, and the single slide clause was applied, and the original contract was increased to ¥10,811,550 to ¥10,616,850. In20 with the explanation of the authorities, the price of steel materials etc. increased in 2008 and the contract amount of construction was inappropriate. Therefore, the price of the main construction material in the construction contract was significantly。ctuated and the contract fee was inappropriate. In the case of this request, if the請ctuation due to the price rise exceeds 1% of the contract fee, the amount is added to the contract fee. There is a description. In order to apply a single slide clause, it was necessary to confirm the contract amount that is the first standard for judgment, so the construction was decided by the change contract at the April extraordinary meeting and confirmed the contract amount that is the standard for judgment. According to the contract of the construction, the contract change by May 29, this year was necessary to apply a single slide clause, so we decided to dispose of the contract. In the committee, if the number of steel materials is not finalized by the design change contract, the change contract may be made at the same time by applying the design change contract and the change contract due to the application of the single product slide clause. However, if you need to make a decision, you need to review the design change contract first and confirm the quantity of the target steel material, then discuss with the customer. Please be advised that you will be discussed with the orderer at the expected position. In the future, there is a response that we would like to explain how to proceed with the parliament before reviewing the design change agreement. Although the above is an overview of the examination, the committee decided to approve the whole meeting accordingly after carefully reviewing such as making local registration. Next, the request for submission of opinions for the active development of forests, forestry, and wood industry measures is requested, but we carefully discussed with the applicant. As a result of the decision of the committee, we decided to adopt it in a match. Next, we asked about the request for a quick draft of the Cooperative Law of Cooperative、 (tentative name) of the request No. 32, but we carefully discussed the purpose of the applicant, but we decided to make a co、al review with the aim of further reviewing from a member. Close the report.
○Chairperson (Mr. Urahide) I will enter a question about the report of the current chairperson. Frequently Questions In this case, we will discuss 3 cases except for the 32nd contract. 36th Senshu Yama。.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama。) (Lecture) The件position of partial amendments to the Sasebo City Reconstruction Project Subsidy Collection and Ordinance. This is an additional proposal for a project that collects dividends from local beneficiaries. It is not necessary to collect a shareholder from the local beneficiary. However, even in the pre、ural 池 maintenance business under the Land Improvement Act until now, even in the pre、ural farmland maintenance business, even in the pre、ural 池 maintenance business under the basic laws of disaster prevention, the burden of beneficiaries was 10%. This is a problem of how to raise the beneficiary burden with 12.5% in the emergency maintenance business of the pre、ural region Mizuta agriculture re編ation. 32 people in Mikawachi area, 31 people in Yuzugi area, 63 people in total. The beneficiary’s burden is ¥975 million. You can’t feel the attitude of helping farmers to support agriculture even a little. On the other hand, it is a big difference from the intent that you want to introduce casino special zones to the first time in Japan. opposite. Next, it is the opposite of the report of the 、。ling of 、 concerning the conclusion of the 14th report construction contract (change contract). Nishiumi Pearl Sea Center Aquarium is applied to a single sheet of steel material in construction work, and the contract amount is 887,9,300 yen. The steel material of the material was originally 801.5 tons at the design stage. Due to the lack of steel materials and need to be reinforced 184.4 tons, we changed the contract for 4,022,450 yen in the parliament on April 14, 2009. This time, it is subject to the application of a single slide clause, including the additional steel material of the problem, but it was added 887,9,300 yen. In the end, the original contract was ¥9,788,8,100, but eventually it was swelling in the contract of ¥10,679,850. There is a strong suspicion that the company claims to go through, and it was about 50 million yen extra tax. More, opposite.
○Chairperson (Urahideo) In addition, we will first issue a partial amendment of the 池 maintenance business subcontract collection and例 regulations in Sasebo City. We will ask for the 立 of a member who agrees to make a decision according to the original draft. It is a large number of成s. Therefore, this issue was decided as the original. Next, we will grant a report on the consignment of the 14th report construction contract (change contract). We will ask for the launch of a member who agrees to approve it. It is a large number of成s. This is approved. Next, we will make a request No.30. Is there any objection to adoption? (There is no objection) This issue has been adopted. Next, as reported by the Chairman of the Corporate Economics Committee, the sub-committee requests for the rapid enactment of the “Cooperative法 of Cooperative。 (tentative name)” in the sub-committee are subject to the provisions of Article 21 of the Committee Rules. Thank you for your understanding. As the chairperson requests, will you be considered to be a continuous review during the closing? (There is no objection) Therefore, we decided to make a continuous review during the closing. --- --- ---
△Date No.25 Proposal No.67
○President (Demand of Urahi) Next, the agenda of the 25th 67th of the date will be given. We will ask for a review report of each regular chairperson. ---。報告書 As of June 25, 2009, Mr. Kazuo Ura, Chair of the Council of Sasebo City, Katsushi Otsuka, Review Report of the Urban Development Committee. The incident is determined as follows, and the report is based on Article 20 of the Sasebo City Council Regulations. 1 Proposal No. 67 Under the Sasebo City General Accounting Correction Budget (No. 2) Article 1 of the 1st of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year of the budget correction, the Articles of Incorporation of the 8th of the year of the year of the year of the year of the year was decided. --- --- ---
◆Chairman of Urban Development (Mr. Katsushika Otsuka) (Lecture) The 67th Proposal of Sasebo City General Accounting Correction Budget (No. 2), the Committee will report the outline and results of the examination. In connection with the Sasebo city housing business special accounting budget (No. 1) in 2009, the housing business special accounting fee for the repayment of the pre-commercial residential rent is 4,454 million yen. The committee decided to make a draft decision in a match, as a result of the decision. It's easy to report. ---21報告書 Heisei 21 years 6 month 26 day Sasebo City Council chairman Ideo Ura, Chairman of the Board of Education Sasebo City Council Sasebo City Council Sasebo City Council Sasebo City Council Sasebo City Council Sasebo City Council Sasebo City Council Regulations Article 20 1 Proposal No. 67 of the General Accounting Supplementary Budget of Sasebo City (No. 2) in 2009 Article 1 of the Year-end and New Year's Budget Correction, Article 2 of the Articles of Incorporation General Affairs Cost, Article 3 of the Articles of Incorporation, Article 11 of the Articles of Incorporation Education Cost, Article 2, Table 2 of the Debt Compensation (Addition), etc. --- --- ---
◆The chairperson of the Board of Education (Seisei Matsumoto) (lecture) The 67th Proposal will report the outline of the examination and the results of the project submitted to the Committee during the Sasebo City General Accounting Supplementary Budget (No. 2). First of all, it is the 2nd article general、 fee, but as a support project for consumers, there is a total of 2.6 million yen, such as a counselor training fee, public relations and childbirth expenses, in the consumer life consulting business事業ing the consumer government revitalization fund of the prefecture. Next, it is the third shareholder’s living expenses, but as a childbirth and childcare support project, there is a total of 33.8 million yen, such as the national health insurance business special accounting withdrawal for childbirth and childcare facility maintenance business expenses。ing the prefecture’s safe children’s fund. Next, it is the education expenses for the 11th Articles of Incorporation, but it is 30,000,952 million yen, such as the purchase cost of books based on the fund which has been donated from Atsushi family, the preparation for the acquisition of neighboring places for the facility maintenance of Tomei Junior High School, and the land acquisition cost for the construction of school lunch center (tentative name). The committee decided to make a decision in a match. It’s easy, but it’s time to finish the report. ---。報告書 June 26, 2009 President of Sasebo City Council Mr. Deo Ura, Chairman of the Corporate Economic Committee Tetsushi Omura Corporate Economic Committee Judgment Report The incident was decided as follows, so we will report it according to Article 20 of the Sasebo City Council Regulations. 1 Proposal No. 67 Under the Sasebo City General Accounting Correction Budget (No. 2), Article 1 Out of the year-end-year-old budget correction, Article 7 Articles of Incorporation of Commerce and Industry Exp。s or more, the draft was accepted. --- --- ---
◆The chairperson of the Corporate Economic Committee (Tetsushi Omura) (lecture) We will report the outline of the examination and the results of the project submitted to the Committee during the Sasebo City General Accounting Budget (No. 2). Although it is the 、 cost of the Articles of Incorporation, the 4 creation business cost of 4,29 million yen using the pre、ural hometown 。 revitalization special fund is recorded as the 事業 measures business. In response to the explanation of the government, the government established a grant of 25 billion yen to the prefecture to support efforts to create local opportunities, and the prefecture formed the fund as a source of grants from the country. Nagasaki Prefectural Furusato Revitalization Special Fund for 3 years is 6,67,000 yen, and Nagasaki Prefectural Furusato Revitalization Special Fund for 2009 is 2,500,000 yen. On February 27, 2009, we submitted a business plan for three years from FY21 to FY23. In order to create 。 as early as possible as possible, the city has a notification of adoption for the 21st year from the prefecture on May 27th. In order to create 。 as early as possible, the 事業 creation business cost is 4,4617,000 yen, and the budget of 12 new 12 employees is proposed to the recent June regular meeting. Next, there is a question that "the current business adoption rate is 44.9% for the business application amount of 13 prefectures in the21 year 2009, but there is a border distribution of each city such as the population discount". In response, we asked the authorities about the need to re事業 the proposal business from the private sector. We have a response saying, “I would like to re事業 the proposal business and aim to adopt new business.” In addition, we decided to verify the effectiveness of the outsour、 business, and the authorities "This system is obliged to report the actual results every year, and we will verify the sales amount and profits among them. As a result of our business, we have a response that we want to continue to work for 3 years. The Committee has decided to revise the business of the Furusato Revitalization Special Fund, as well as verify the contractor to fully demonstrate the business effect. Close the report. ---。報告書 June 26, 2009 Sasebo City Council Chairman Hideo Ura, General Affairs Chairman Teruo Takamura General Affairs Committee Judgment Report The incident was decided as follows, so we will report it according to Article 20 of the Sasebo City Council Regulations. 1 Proposal No. 67 of the General Accounting Supplementary Budget of Sasebo City (No.2), 2009, Article 1 of the Year-end and New Year's Budget Correction, All Item No. 3, Section 3 of the Regional Debt Correction (Additional) or more, the original proposal was decided. --- --- ---
◆The chairperson of the General Affairs Committee (Tetsuo Takamura) (lecture) The 67th proposal will report the outline of the examination and the results of the project submitted to the Committee during the Sasebo City General Accounting Supplementary Budget (No. 2). First of all, it is about the revenue, but there was a report from the chairman of each resident, and the total amount of 480 million yen including the pre。ural事業enditure such as the 事業 revitalization special fund business subsidy, the nursery office, etc. The Committee said, “What is the reason why we proposed this meeting instead of the March regular meeting of Saki or the April extraordinary meeting of the Furusato Revitalization Special Fund business subsidy” and the authorities said, “On February 27th, we submitted a request to the prefecture and made a notification of adoption on May 27th. On the other hand, the committee pointed out, “We have been discussing with the prefecture because we have already established a fund in the prefecture, so we should not consider the hiring time of a private company that is the 。 side.” However, in the prefecture, there was a basic idea of prioritizing an emergency 、 creation business, and since it took time to examine business co、ity, the time was shifted. In addition, we had questions regarding the thinking of the number of new 、s, the 基準 criteria for new 、s, and the timing of the grant decision of the prefecture subsidy. Next, we decided to calculate the maximum interest rate of 6% of borrowings for the maintenance of school facilities that have been added as a local bond compensation, and the authorities set the upper limit to 6% by about three times to respond to any financial situation. There was a response. The above is an overview of the examination, but the request is to discuss the maximum interest rate of local bonds with the relevant authorities and the Bureau of the Administration, and to consider the setting of arithmetic criteria, as there is a divergence between the actual borrowing interest rate. Close the report.
○Chairperson (Mr. Deo Urahi) Just enter question on the report of each chairperson. Frequently Questions More discussions. Follow the discussion. In addition, we will decide the proposal of the No. 67. Is there any object to make a decision as the original? (There is no objection) Therefore, this issue was decided as the original. --- --- ---
△Date No.26 Opinion draft No.15 and
△Date No.27 Opinion draft No.16
○Chairman (Demand of Urahi) Next, we will make a b。 agenda of 2 proposals of the 26th proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal of the proposal. Request a description of the proposal.
◆General Affairs Committee (Tetsuo Takamura) (Lecture) The reason for the proposal of an opinion proposal for an increase in the budget of the base counter。 No. 15 was as follows. Thank you for your understanding.
◆The chairperson of the corporate economy (Tetsushi Omura) (lecture) The reason for the proposal of the opinion proposal for the proactive development of the forest, forestry and wood industry measures was as follows. Thank you for your understanding. More
○Chairman (Mr. Urahide) I will enter the question more than this. Frequently Questions More discussions. Follow the discussion. In addition, we will collect two proposals of the proposal No. 15 and the proposal No. 16 of the proposal. Is there any objection to make a decision? (There is no objection) Therefore, the above two were decided as the original. --- --- ---
△Date No.28 Opinion draft No.17
○President (Demand of Urahi) Next, the proposal of the 28th proposal will be the agenda. Request a description of the proposal.
◆No.33 (Mr. Hiromichi Ichioka) (Lecture) I would like to express my opinion on the construction promotion of Ishigi Dam No. 17 of the proposals, but I would like to express my opinions. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. Thank you for your understanding.
○Chairman (Mr. Urahide) I will enter the question more than this. 36th Senshu Yama。.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama。) (Lecture) The proposal is also a special chairperson of water resource securing measures. Special Committee on Water Resources Securing was held yesterday. On the other hand, as the personality of yesterday's committee, the chairperson himself said that this is only a place to describe the opinions of each member of the current business certification. I asked the chairperson to confirm that I was not able to do so, and I also confirmed the chairperson. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. In addition, the proposed person is a member of the Special Committee on Water Resources Securing Measures, except for me, and the person who said that it should be approved by the Committee yesterday. I did not dream that yesterday's committee would connect like this. At what time did you think of this proposal? What time did you think? Why did you make a proposal? The governor of the prefecture is the pre ural parliament, and there is a saying that you want to discuss the parliament at the city council meeting place, but I would like to clarify how this association is. This is what I want to hear from one of the proceedings. Then, the point of contents. We will ask you for the actual situation. In the opinion draft, we will revise the public interest of the business from the state of white paper in a neutral position, and strive to advance the place of discussion. On the other hand, the residents also talked about the white paper. What is different? I think that this framework of land consumables is created. The purpose of this business certification is to discuss, but the purpose of the business certification application is to discuss. I want to check whether it is such a thing. Then, I will ask you where the situation of the white paper and the state of the white paper that the residents are asked. Then, at the end, but at the end of the process, we sincerely reverb that the residents had a deep heart injury due to the forced survey of 57 as a business operator after the procedure, and ask that the ge s take full advantage of it. I will ask you if it is such a thing.
◆No.33 (Mr. Hiromichi Ichioka) I would like to ask about 5 points. First I was touched with the process of the special committee of water resource securing yesterday. Then, I think that this proposal was the first question of the first question, but I will be able to run a special committee in the chairperson's position yesterday. As a premise, the board members have been touched, but at this meeting, I am also involved, but based on certain exchangesやり with the construction of Ishigi Dam from the standpoint of each member, the special committee of water resource securing measures is the first title, and the construction of Ishigi Dam is promoted. I would like to express my sincere gra to this meeting, or even the pre ural parliament, etc., but in the movement of this dam construction business, the application for business certification is very close up, and at this time, I would like to share with each of the members. I will make a decision as the chairperson if there is a need to discuss based on it. As a result, it is said that the committee of yesterday, but as a result, as the members of the board members were talking about, the other people except the members had the same direction and a place of discussion. After receiving it, I also liked the opinions - this is as I am thinking about myself in the general question of the previous one, but I will talk with the members of the romoro, and at this time, I should be able to express this opinion again and again. The opinions were consolidated as if they came to the time when they should be able to take care of externally after obtaining the consent of the members of the same opinion. After the Special Committee on Water Resources Securing yesterday, I decided to make a proposal today as a flow, and I would like to answer the question of the second and the first question. Third The purpose of discussion is to be discussed in the opinion draft, but I wanted to confirm whether this is done. {{ item.start datetime }} Fourth, white paper. The people who are unfortunately opposed to the business are talking about the situation of white paper as a way of thinking. Even in the text of the opinion book that we have come out now, there is a need to see it again from the state of white paper, but I think that it is generally the same thing, and how it is different. In order to revise this white paper, which we have written opinions, it is important to examine business certification in a fair and fair position in a so-called public institution. In such a sense, we use this word in the sense that we will see this business from the white paper state first. This is the fourth answer. In the last sentence, we are not using any force or compulsory statements, but we do not use any force or compulsory statements in the process. We believe that it is in the framework of the land settlement law, and the purpose is to provide a place for discussion, so we can accept such a form. This is the answer to question.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama、) (Lecture) It is a problem of white paper, but it is a condition of white paper under the certification office. In this case, the state of white paper is about public interest, but it is really a start from scratch, and it is not the premise that the residents are looking for it, but it is not exactly the same as the situation of white paper, where I want to discuss whether Ishigi dam really is necessary from scratch and white paper. However, the difference is whether it is a discussion under this framework of land const、tion, or is it possible to talk in a arbitrary manner, and whether it is a condition of paper on this site? So, if you say that you are really trying to discuss, you are making a proposal to actively engage in discussions with the local people, so there is no need to apply for a business certification based on the land income law. Is it possible to solve the problem if there is an administrative feeling that I want to respond to the discussion immediately under this white paper? Contact Us
◆No.33 (Mr. Hiromichi Ichioka) Indeed, the state of white paper, and the people who are opposed to each of them want to talk in the state of white paper. We would like you to proceed with the certification work in the state of white paper for the proposal of opinions we have made. I talked about the same meaning. It may be the same from the viewpoint of 36 members. However, I don’t want to use a definitively different method, but I think it’s not an ex。ation to say that it’s a zero-based verification work by a public institution by legal backing. If so, I answered from the authorities in the answer of the general question of the previous question, and the risk is also true. In that sense, we also explained that this business is in the state of white paper, which is legally backed by public institutions. That’s right. I understand that each word is the same, but I think that the difference between the things that stand up is there. {{ item.start datetime }}
○President (Urahideo) Q&A Thank you for your understanding. I would like to omit the commissioning according to the provisions of Article 31-3 of the Conference Rules. Is there any objection to this? (There is no objection) I decided to do so. More discussions. The 16th rectangular member.
◆No.16 (Kanko-kun) We will discuss opinions on the construction promotion of Ishigi Dam. There are currently 13 landowners who are against the dam in the Ishida Iwaya area and Kawahara area. It is a person who has suffered a strong impact on the way of forced measurement of the prefecture 27 years ago, and who has been seriously aware of the sense of trust in the governor and administrative authorities, and who has not yet been affected by the wounds of the mind. This opinion cannot be accepted as the Sasebo City Council, in order to apply for a business certification that ultimately has a view of forced or compulsory use. A business certification based on the Land Acquisition Act will revise the public interest of the business in a neutral position and ensure the opportunity to participate in residents such as hearing. Accordingly, when a place of discussion is created, the method of business certification breaks the feeling of obstruction so far, and the business will expand smoothly. Indeed, if you read the contents and procedures of business certification, you can interpret it so that you can set up a place to talk with the opponents by making business certifications to the country. Therefore, the public hearing is really formal, and I have not heard any of the opinions of the citizens, and I have never heard of an example that the business has moved against the national plan by the result of the hearing. Ishigi Dam’s absolute opposite alliances have demonstrated their thoughts for 34 years, and they have a feeling of話をility in Sasebo City and the prefecture. One-sided way of thinking and method of business certification is to be more and more attitude. For the past two years, I feel that the movement of the dinosaurs is a behavior that really reverses the mind of local people too much. In addition, the special committee was opened on June 4 and 10, and the application for business certification was requested for the prefecture on the 10th. I feel that this opinion book is part of a series of schedules for two years. It is not quite a way to fill out the outer moat of the local opponents. In Sasebo City, we can not tolerate dams in ways that force them to deprive the land and places of life of people who live in the local area. I also used public interest, but I think that the public interest of Sasebo City should be considered as the survival rights of 13 people. We will object to the submission of this statement.
○Chairperson (Urahideo) Sennyo Yama。, 36.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama。) (Lecture) It is a draft opinion to open the road for forced yield. It indicates that the Ishigi Dam construction business that has been running without the同意 of the consent of the relevant landowner is finally facing a collapse. In the middle of the course, the situation worsened by the introduction of the mobilization team. On the other hand, the collaborators promised to receive a total of 300 million yen of support, and they have continued to do so today with all the methods of め and muchi. The process table was devised just by saying, but the people of the opponents did not flexibly. And finally, the governor of the prefecture and the Sasebo City Hall are the way to travel around the land consolidation law while the Sasebo City Council is affected. Although it is said to be a discussion, it is not reflected as a discussion when the residents look at it. It is only painful to crouching human dignity. Nobody has the right to follow the basic rights of such people. Even if the utility is not possible, the utility is now completely unfounded, but it should be rethinking the reality that the business can not be done because of the lack of consent to the landlord. I think that the construction budget, which is calculated annually, will eventually become だendous and will only deepen the contradiction between the appraisers, so I will try to increase my budget and financial results every time. However, it is not the reason that the acclaimer is up to 80% and cannot be pulled back. Sasebo City may be required before requesting residents. Why do we keep 10,000 tons of water leaking? Why did you keep the water effective like Fukuoka and Kobe? In addition, why did you make a water-saving ordinance like Fukuoka City, and make it to a specialized organizational system whether water-saving is progressing as usual, and do not make such efforts? Or why does Kawatani dam try to solve the current situation that only 65% can be stored? The water volume from the river is 280,500 tons. Do you want to make an effort to communicate with water s so that we can supply this more stable? On the other hand, the population is expected to be large, but it is not enough to set the demand for excessive water, so it is necessary to say Ishigi Dam. Another thing is to draw a composition that the residents who are not talking to this time. If you’re in a white paper, you’ll always discuss, say, and today, the residents will be stepped down, recommended, recommended, and recommended by the residents, as well as public discussions on whether there is really a need for Ishigi Dam in front of the prefecture. If you do not have any right to apply for business certification based on the land consumable law, will you be able to discuss immediately? Why don’t you do it? Even if it is a jisui theory, it is said that it is water damage measures in Kawanashi-cho, but Ishigi River is only one-。rd of the river terrace river flow. The flood adjustment function in one-。rd of September, basically does not lead to the jisui theory of Kawaramachi. If you are confident that you are in interest, do not try to expand the opinions in front of the pre ural people, and to acquire the spirit of the pre ural people, and then choose the path to ask the people who are involved in stones. We believe that people who want to stay there, and those who want to take their rights with power, should not choose the way to apply for business certification and forced income, and will end the discussion on this proposal.
○Chairperson (Urahideo) In addition, we will issue a letter of opinion on the construction promotion of Ishigi Dam No. 17. We will ask for the 立 of a member who agrees to make a decision according to the original draft. It is a large number of成s. Therefore, this issue was decided as the original. --- --- ---
△Date No.29 Resolution No.4
○Chairperson (Demand of Urahi) Next, we will assume the resolution No. 4 of the date No. 29. Request a description of the proposal.
◆ Special Chair of Base Counter、s (Mr. Masayuki Nagayama) (Lecture) We will give a draft statement to the principal about the resolution for the utilization of the Sakibe District No.4. Thank you for your understanding. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. Thank you for your understanding.
○Chairman (Mr. Urahide) I will enter the question more than this. 36th Senshu Yama。.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama。) First of all, I would like to briefly describe the reason and the reason to submit this proposal. In the second place, the Sakibe area was originally returned as a result of the return movement of citizens, and was partially re提供ed to the U.S. Army as an alternative to the housing construction site化 with the port of the U.S. ship, and today it has been a LCAC base since 94. It is a place where citizens exercised as a base for SSK and realized for return, so if it is re-returned, I think that it should be useful and utilized as a private public facility from the flow, but why is it? Third U.S. Army gets a full-fledged LCAC base in Yokoze. Then, for the U.S. Army, the Self-Def、 Force is strengthened. Where is this merit for citizens? There is no description anywhere. Find out where to benefit citizens. In 2005, the former Kobukubo in the Sakibe area had been conceived as a concept. Please show where the difference between this concept and the Kobutsu concept is.
◆ Special Committee on Base Counter。s (Mr. Masayuki Nagayama) In that case, I first talked about the reason and the reason, but basically the reason for this matter was that I would like to encourage people from the first time to the parliament to the utilization of the Sakibe, as a parliament, and the way of utilization of the government, to the parliament. That’s right, but I don’t know how to make a resolution first. Basically, I was given the direction to make a decision by the Council Steering Committee, and I was given the direction in the whole meeting, so I would like to understand it by receiving the direction of the Council Steering Committee. However, in that case, one direction of the resolution was determined, in order to give a certain direction in the viewpoint of the resolution that is the idea of the person in question. Along with that, whether or not to be discussed by resolution is discussed by the Special Committee of Base Counter。s, and it was decided to discuss without objection in the whole meeting. What is the reason for the resolution? As previously mentioned in the resolution, the parliament and the government wanted to make a presentation to the parliament by clarifying the direction of the utilization of one of the benefits that outlined the approach of the authorities. We created a proposal of a resolution in a form that stands for the parliament and drinks its intention. There are many questions about that matter, of course, as there are various questions about the latter, etc., which are said earlier, so the direction of taking it back to each member was made. It was decided in the special committee of base measures on June 12th. In the judgement that there was enough time for each member to take home, I think that I will be able to understand that I discussed again on June 30 as a result of taking home in each member. The second question, the use of it as a public facility, and what is the public nature? I think that whether citizens use it, or whether it is a facility in the country, but basically it is used by the Self-Def Force for the parliament, and as a past problem, I have been in the influence of the Harbor Council in 1989, and parliament, and there is a responsibility for the parliament that this pier is encompassed by the port plan. In addition, I would like to express my opinion that it is only possible to separate the world of the army and the army in short, leading to strengthening the U.S. Army and Self Defense Force. And there was a merit for citizens. However, I understand that there was a difference between the concept of Kobu-mae. However, I understand that this is because I had sufficient consideration in each member who took home.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama。) (Lecture) When it comes to proceeding with this resolution, the facility of the Self-Def。 Force is created in the area of the Sakibe. It is written in this resolution, but it was my question that I could not see it from this resolution. On the other hand, the chairperson gave a reply to him that he was brought back to each member and made a conclusion on it. So, I would like to know what kind of merit is, whether it has been faced and s rated in the committee from the members who were brought back. What is the benefits of citizens? Then, the concept of Kobuki is very stepping in. At the same time, the Maritime Self-Def Force will try to aggregate the facility here. The difference between this and this concept is that it was the same answer, but whether it is recognized as a difference in what it is. I'd like to hear that.
◆ Special Chair of Base Counter s (Mr. Masayuki Nagayama) It is a good idea that I would like to ask for the deliberation itself as a parliament, and I would like to get your consent because I can only make a statement that was discussed in the committee, but I would like to get the conclusion that I did not know what I said earlier, as I explained earlier, in the controversials, and in the controversial statements. However, as I mentioned earlier, I would like to express my personal recognition here.
○President (Urahideo) Q&A More discussions. 36th Senshu Yama。.
◆No.36 (Senaki Yama、) (Lecture) The U.S. army has introduced Japanese finances to Yokoze, with a total of 2.5 billion yen, and the total capacity is from 4 hectares to 17 hectares. As a result, we have built a LCAC base that has only two locations in the mainland of the United States. After that, the east side of the Sakibe will be used by the Self-Def、 Force, and the U.S. Army is Yokoze, and the Self-Def。 Force is Sakibe, and it will be further strengthened. The Sakibe area was originally a result of the movement of citizens as a land for SSK, and it was partially re-provided to the U.S. army as a substitute for the housing construction area due to the portification of the U.S. ship, however, that it will be re-returned, so it should be used as a private public facility. The Sakibe-cho Line Road, which is already bypassing the Self-Def Force Facility, is built by the subsidy of the Defense Agency. In addition, the return of the島shima district where Sasebo city was originally depicted, the separation of military products began, and the local reconstruction of the self-def facility began. It is a situation that the development as an international commercial port is becoming more promising, so it is impossible to bring a self-def。 facility to the Sakibe. If you dare to become a self-defの, you should move all of the functions of the島shima area and realize the initial plan. After all, in the major movement of the U.S. Army re編ation, we don’t ask for a base shrinkage, and instead put a large amount of tax on the other hand to provide more facilities than ever, and only to enhance the function of the self-def Force. We will deepen our citizens’ discussions on this issue, which requires significant changes. In the case of a storm, the self-def、 team is using the Tatejin Pier, but instead of doing it to the U.S. Army, I have to use all three shores from the 1 shore to SSK, and I have not said that it will be returning to島shima, but the current situation is that the facility of the maritime self-def、 team is in Hirase, there is a pier in the Tatejin, and there is a business team in島shima, and the maritime self-def、ation facility is in the state. However, at this time, there is nothing that leads to the merit of citizens when you look at this resolution. In this way, this approach is only to strengthen the facilities of the U.S. Army and Self-Def Forces, and we will end the discussion against this resolution.
○Chairperson (Urahideo) The resolution for the utilization of the Sakibe District No. 4 of the resolution is determined from this. We will ask for the 立 of a member who agrees to make a decision according to the original draft. It is a large number of成s. Therefore, this issue was decided as the original. All incidents that were assigned to the June regular meeting have been closed. June regular meeting will be closed. 4:29 p.m. Closing---Chairman of Sasebo City Council,--- Vice-Chairman of Sasebo City Council, Ura...