23
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) Open today's meeting. There are 31 attendees. The meeting was established. --- --- ---
△Reports
○Chairperson (Kiichi Takino) We will report on various matters. First of all, there was a document for the management status of the corporation in項 with the provisions of Article 243, Paragraph 2 of the Local Autonomy Act from June 24th, 2017. Next, the proposal No. 1 was submitted from 8 out of Junpei Yoshida, and the proposal No. 2 was submitted from 4 out of Kunio Asagawa. ---意見意見 (Second Regular Meeting of the Narashino City Council in 1991) Proposal No. 1 Opinions against the introduction of the Small Election and Party Law shall be submitted in規定 with the provisions of Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Regulation. On June 28, 1991, Mr. Kiichi Takino, Chairman of the Council of Narashino City, Mr. Kiichi Takino, Prof. Junhei Yoshida, Member of the Council of Narashino City, Shizuko Kimura 〃 〃 Keiji Seki 〃 〃 〃 Nobusha 〃 Kazuo Miyauchi 〃 Tetsutoshi 〃 〃 Hisako Tatsumi 〃 Hisae政 〃 Masayuki Kobe, Director of the Election District and the Party Law, announced that it will be introduced. A small-electoral zone system is a mechanism to create a system that can monopolize 80% of the seats of the parliament to the parliament. The strong demands of the citizens are to make fundamental corrections to the constant correction of less than one to two in the current election system, so that it is clear even in the national meeting resolution and the constant disparity judgment. In addition, public grants to political parties are invasive of the freedom of “corporation” guaranteed by the Const、tion to determine the qualification requirements of political parties as a subsidy. Therefore, the City Council is strongly opposed to the introduction of the small election system and political party law. Submit an opinion form in with the provisions of Article 99, Paragraph 2 of the Local Autonomous Law. Heisei Year Month The reason for the Proposal is to submit a written opinion to the Prime Minister of Japan, the Minister of Autonomy and other government agencies. ---意見意見 (Second Regular Meeting of the Narashino City Council in 1991) Proposal No. 2 Proposal No. 2 Proposal for Special Grants and Other Opinions for A。ification of Private Grants shall be submitted in。 with Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Regulations. On June 28, 1991, Mr. Kiichi Takino, Chairman of the Council of Narashino City Council, Submitted by Kunio Asakawa, Compliant of the Council of Narashino City, Shizuko Kimura 〃 Tomio Tadahata 〃 〃 Hisashiko Tatsumi 〃 Kunio Miura and other opinions that seek a large increase in private grants such as a short-term special grant. Nevertheless, the budget of private relations in the country continues to be reduced and suppressed and has not yet been recovered until today. Such reductions and suppression are convened to raise tuition costs, and it is believed that the graduation of educational conditions between public and private is further enlarged. These facts are obviously beyond the limits of the tuition cost of the father and her mother, and at the same time significantly impaired the principles of equal education opportunities, making it even more difficult to learn about private education that has reached the student’s short-term. However, there is a great opportunity for students to improve and improve their educational conditions. In order to ensure the education that each student has reached, the country and the prefecture are responsible for taking special grants for the short-term. Accordingly, the government and the pre ural government recognizes the importance of the role of private education in public education, and a large increase in financial support as well as the tolerance of the father and mother’s burden and education conditions in the student’s rapid reduction period, we strongly ask for special grants for the rapid reduction period. Submit an opinion form in with the provisions of Article 99, Paragraph 2 of the Local Autonomous Law. Heisei Year Month Chairman of Narashino City Council Kiyoichi Takino Proposal Reason This proposal is to submit a written opinion to the Minister of Education, Government and other government agencies. --- --- ---
○Chairperson (Kiichi Tamachi) Next, I would like to share with you about the meeting. On June 26, the 67th Annual Meeting of the National Congress of the City Council was held at Tokyo Hibiya Public Hall. In the general meeting of the Chairperson, the commendation of a permanent member and staff was held, and as a 20-year-old member, Nobuo Baba, and as a 15-year-old employee, Mr. Ryohei Kanako, as a ten-year-old employee, was commended. This will end the report. We will take a break for a while to communicate the certificate of commendation. 1:12 p.m. Break---------------------- p.m. Restart at 1:19 p.m.
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) Continue to open the meeting before a break. --- --- ---
△No of the meeting signing member
○Chairperson (Kiichi Takita) Nominates the first meeting member. In with the provisions of Article 81 of the Conference Rules, the Committee shall nominate the Chairs to the Chairs, Mr. Misako Hotsuki and Kunio Asagawa. --- --- ---
△About the Proposal No. 38 and Proposal No. 47 and No. 1 of the Proposal No. 1 and No. 3 of the Proposal No. 3 (Chairman's Report)
○The chairperson (Kiichi Takino) is the agenda of No.2, No.38, No.47, No.1, No.3, No.3. ---、報告書 June 25, 1991 Chairman of the Narashino City Council Kiyoichi Takino General Affairs Standing Committee Chairman Hisano Takino Committee Review Report The incident to the Committee was determined as follows. In the case of a request for the establishment of a large number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, and the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number of proposals, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, and the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the number, the decision. Copyright (C) 103KISHI BUSSAN CO.,LTD. All Rights Reserved. Copyright (C) 2009-2016 Kunio Asagawa. All Rights Reserved. Result of Article Number ExaminationRemarksNo.38The Enactment of Ordinances to Revise Part of Dementia nursing allowances of Dementia in Narashino CityAll Approvals (Contracts and情s)Recipient NumberNo.1Special Grants for Alumni---------
○Chairperson (Kiichi Tamachi) Requests a report of the chairperson on this matter. First of all, Mr. Kuyuki Tada, the chairperson of the general、. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of General Affairs Executive Committee Kunori Tamachi Speaker〕
◆We would like to inform you of the progress and results of the examination for the three proposals and one statements attached to the General Affairs Standing Committee. First of all, I would like to inform you about the settlement regarding the billing of the building and land transfer etc. of the former Narashino movie theater. This proposal was proposed as a litigation case for the existence of leasehold rights by Mr. Jinshan, Representative Director of Narashino Movie Theater on July 18, 1988. In the case of the decision of the 2nd temporary meeting of the Heisei era and the course of the meeting of the representatives of the association on October 4, 1990, there was a question that the settlement should be consulted with the representative meeting before the proposal was proposed. On March 15th, the government finally presented the settlement from the court. The three-kami refugees at that time shall receive this settlement, and from the three-kami refugees, under the new system after the election, the new refugees would like to judge the subsequent treatment. So, in the new case, we reported it as the most important transfer matters, and we decided to propose proposals to the June regular meeting at the judgment of the new case. In addition, the Commissioner has questioned what it means to “waive a refund claim for the overpaid usage fee of 467,287 yen” in Article 8 of the settlement clause, and this overpayment is caused by the issue of the Ordinance, even though the City has not issued a notice that the city has no leasehold interest to the Narashino Movie Theater. After that, I was asked to make a request for return, but because the other party did not respond, the overpayment is the responsibility of the income. This is an appendix for this settlement. In any case, this was a mistake for the lack of sufficient communication within the city, and there was a response that it would be difficult to understand. In 61, the leased land contract was to return to the ownership of the city by making the proceeds from Narashino City after 30 years. There was a question on how to write about the city’s settlement. At that time, there was a response from the authorities that it was caused by the fact that it was not considered to be a place to use the land, because it was governmentally returning that land because it was a city land. On the other hand, it is important that the government did not carry out the procedure of the dawn as soon as the contract has passed 30 years. In addition, there was an opinion that the problem of overpayment that occurred after the appeal of the complaint was made, the simple administrative error occurred, and the sense of tension was not enough. In addition, one committee member had a question of why he did not take legal action at this time, even though he had to cancel the contract one-way if he had a plan for public or public use in規定 with the provisions of local autonomy law. In the case of a request for return of land by local autonomy law, the law is that there is no definite reason for the public administration, or the fact that it was not used in the time of the due date. However, at that time, there was no plan decision to use this land for the purpose of return, and the movie theater was not abolished at that time, and there was no request for return for these reasons. In addition, even though the appeal of the complaint was decided at the 2nd extraordinary meeting of Heisei era and appealed to the court that it should be fully returned, there was a question of whether it could be settlement at this point. On the other hand, Narashino City had a position to be fully returned by the authorities, but the court heard the phrases of the Narashino movie theater side, and there was a response that was ultimately presented in the course of 10 oral valves. In addition, one committee member asked both opinions on whether this settlement is a condition indicated by the city, whether it was presented by the Narashino movie theater, or whether the settlement was issued by the court. In the 1930s, the court had a question of what was the basis of 20% transfer in the settlement clause and whether the court had confirmed the basis of 20%, but the court did not confirm the basis of 20% from the authorities. The redevelopment project around Keisei-Okubo Station is highly demanded by residents such as modernization business of the shopping street and Hashikami Station, so first it is necessary to develop a square in front of Keisei-Okubo Station. For this reason, the land to be returned is the best place as an alternative. In addition, there was a response to the fact that the city internal reforms the organizational reform, and the sections that can be used for urban redevelopment business by the next April. There was a discussion of the opposite from one member who ended the question and entered the discussion. First of all, in the opposite position, there was no legal procedure to be taken from the administrative side in 61, and even if the plan is determined by the South Exit Square of Oike Station in the 1940s, it was the negligence of the government to do the work in order to provide this land for public use. In addition, if the decision of the second extraordinary meeting of Heisei era and the confirmation of the representative meeting in October, 1990, the proposal proposal in this content is regretful and the parliament is also a light vision, so it is the opposite. In addition, from the standpoint of appraisal, the cause of this incident is the administrative side, and the responsibility is important. However, the settlement conditions are reasonable if you consider social background and historical course. In order to develop the Keisei-Okubo station for citizens, there was a discussion that government delays should not be allowed and should be addressed to settlement. After the discussion, I decided that it should be accepted as many as possible. Next, for the purpose of obtaining consent for the agenda No. 41, and for the purpose of electing the agenda No. 42, the proposal No. 41 is Mr. Suzuki, and No. 42 is Mr. Junichiro Toba. In the judging of the proposal, one committee member had a question of whether the predecessor and income officer had been resigned when the 制 was concerned, and the authorities had no reappointment until now. We decided to agree with the majority of the採s, as a result of the two proposals. Finally, I would like to inform you about the情. On the other hand, we would like to express our affirmation to the establishment of voluntary governments and the realization of a clear national and local life. This情 is for government agencies to make a significant increase in the number of national officials, to make a reduction plan, to abolish the total capacity law, to all workers, to make a full weekly two-day and weekly 40 hours system by1992 2017, and to shorten working hours. There is no doubt about this情, and the results of the採 are determined to be unapproved with a few favors. Ends reporting of the General Affairs Standing Committee. 〔Chairman of General Affairs : Hisayuki Tamachi altar〕
○Chairperson (Kiichi Takino) Next, Mr. Kazuo Miyauchi, Senior Chair of Construction. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of Construction : Kazuo Miyauchi’s Speaker〕
◆I would like to report from the Construction Standing Committee. We would like to inform you about the progress and results of the examination for five proposals and one application submitted to the Construction Standing Committee. Prior to the review, the Committee shall proceed to the judging and proceed to the judging. I would like to express my order by the proposal. First of all, we would like to inform you about the conclusion of the contract for construction No. 43 (Keisei Minomai Station North Exit Bicycle Parking Lot (Part 2). This plan is to enter into a contract contract agreement with Goyo Construction Co., Ltd. for the construction work of the Kitaguchi Bicycle Parking Lot (Part 2) of Keisei Minomai Station. As a member of the judging committee, I think that the average looks of the parking lot lighting should be a bit wider, and there was a doubt that the position of the guardman is not suitable, but the lighting is around 80 Lux, but I would like to raise the power of Lux. As for the lifting gate, there is a standard of the Ministry of Construction, and the design was made based on the criteria. In the management side, there was a response that the administrator and the staff were arranged, and the management system was taken with consideration for the security aspects. Is it possible to stay on the bicycle in consideration of the interest of the elderly and the disabled from another member? There is still a condition that the parking lot in front of the station is unable to walk, but there was a question of whether to take measures such as swelling the people until the parking lot was built, but there are already three urban planning parking lots in the city. As for the increase of the number of people in the bicycle parking lot, there was a response to consider it difficult to intertwine the budget. In addition, there was a bad manner for people riding bicycles such as two-seater rides and lights-free fires from the committee. After the Q&A session, there was no discussion on the proposal, and the results of the採 were determined to be approved by all. Next, we would like to inform you about the conclusion of the contract for the draft No. 44 (To Narashino Sewage Main Line Sewage Works). This plan is intended to enter into a contract contract agreement with the Japan Land Development Co., Ltd. with a contract amount of 1,7365,8,000 yen for the幹age work on the To Narashino Sewage Main Line. From the judging committee members, this route is a traffic congestion, but there was a question of how to take safety measures and work time, while を配置 a guardman and take sufficient care for safety measures and mitigation of traffic congestion. We had a briefing session with local shop associations for working hours, etc., and we wanted to work in the best way while walking with each other. After that, I would like to be able to proceed with construction safely because there is a substantial schoolchild in the commuting and school hours. In order to reduce traffic congestion during construction, there was a demand that we would like to place appropriate operators for inductors. After the Q&A session, there was no discussion on the proposal, and the results of the採 were determined to be approved by all. Next, we would like to inform you about the conclusion of the contract for the Proposal No. 45 (Sewage construction of Hamada River Rainwater Main Line). This plan is intended to enter into a contract agreement with Mitsui Construction Co., Ltd. with a contract amount of 540 million yen for工事erage work on the Hamada River Rainwater Main Line. In the judging committee, there was a question that there was no worry about the ターorback in the joint point of the Hamada River and General side. Another member had a question of what plans for the construction of existing commercial facilities after the completion of the construction, but there was a question that I would like to discuss about the existing commercial facilities or how to use them after協. After the Q&A session, there was no discussion on the proposal, and the results of the採 were determined to be approved by all. Next, we would like to inform you about the conclusion of the contract for construction No. 46 (Okubo Shopping Street Se。age Works). This plan is intended to enter into a contract contract agreement with Daisei Road Co., Ltd. for the商店街erage work of Okubo Shopping Street. From the committee members who entered the judging, there was a question of how long the construction work is scheduled to be, and whether it will be completely closed. Although it is difficult to get around when construction of the shogun, there were answers to briefings and meetings with the shop officials. Next, I would like to consult with the committee members so that the shop has become a type of night. It is a place where university and high school students pass, and I want to be careful about traffic. In the case of full traffic, there was a request that several arrows should be put to understand the bypass. After the Q&A session, there was no discussion on the proposal, and the results of the採 were determined to be approved by all. Next, we would like to inform you about the conclusion of the contract for the Proposal No. 47 (Tanitsu 5 of Keisei Main Line No. 2 of Kikuda River). This plan is to enter into a contract contract agreement with Kyosei Electric Railway Co., Ltd. with the contract amount of 766 million yen for the trajectory protection work (Part 2)工事 with the crossing of Tanitsu 5 of the Keisei Main Line of Kikuda River No. 2 Main Line. The proposal acknowledges the explanation of the authorities and decided that all of them should be approved as a result of the vote. Next, I would like to request a petition to be a city park with the site of the Chiba University 研究所atories No.3. The wish for this petition is that there is no park in the Izumi-cho area of Okubo and Izumi-cho area, so the former Chiba University Active Research Institute site, which is the land owned by Okura Province, is called for saving it as a city park including 500 trees. I heard the opinions of the authorities in the examination of this petition, and after the explanation, I plan to go to the Okura province to see the end of the parliament, but I wanted to ask the government to ensure the possible area for the residents. There was no doubt about this petition, and from one member in the discussion, the petition was to drink the wishes of the locals and to make a stand for praise, including the meaning that it must be協 somewhere. As a result of this request, we decided that all applicants should be accepted. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. 〔Chairman of Construction : Kazuo Miyauchi altar〕
○Chairperson (Kiichi Tamachi) Next, Mr. Hiro, Chairman of the Minsei Economic Standing Committee. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of the Civil Economic Standing Committee Hiroki Speakers〕
◆Chairperson of the Minshuku Economic Standing Committee (Hiroku-kun) We will report the progress of the examination and the result of the establishment of the Ordinance to amend part of the Minshuku National Health Insurance Ordinance No. 39. This plan is to raise the amount of insurance premiums from 40,000 yen to 40,000 yen, and to 300,000 yen to 30,000 yen for households reduced by 60,000 yen to 30,000 yen for households reduced by 60,000 yen. In the case of this proposal, it was first questioned that the amount of保gnation fee was質gnation, and the authority suggested that the当局gnation fee was JPY 3,85.5 million in63 year 1988, JPY 48.8 million in Heisei era, and JPY 420 million in。 year.。 this, there was a question about the cause of this納gnation, the trend of年代gnation by age, the prevention measures and the treatment of the処置gnation. On the other hand, the authorities first explained that the cause of住民gnation is 1 in the order of納gnation, 2 in need of living, 3 out of management, and unstable income. In addition, this city is one of the causes of住民gnation, even if the relocation of residents is severe. In addition, there was a response to the young age, the storage rate of the 20s was worse, and the tendency to be納gnation is higher than the other age. In addition to taking measures to prevent or reduce策gnation, we have taken measures to close contact with the payer by night telephone promotion and Sunday整理gnation, as well as taking measures such as対策gnation, pushing, or later納gnation to the payer from a fair position. In addition, due to the increase of national insurance premiums and納gnation, there was a question of whether the保gnation will be charged if the national insurance premium rises, but it was almost lying by the authorities to see the changes in the past collection rate, and it was not necessarily matched. Next, for the question of how much the burden per ins、 person is, the repetition of the general accounting amount is 15,000 million yen, and the population at the end of March 2017 was 1,007 yen per person. In addition, I think that the country's subsidy cut is trying to raise the national insurance premium, but there was a response that the authorities are plus, and minus, it is about 127 million yen. In the situation where the national health insurance premium is very expensive, the national health insurance system which is made to protect the health and life of the citizens was not allowed to raise insurance premium by the subsidy cut of the country. The above discussion was concluded and the result of the decision on this proposal was decided that the majority of the applicants should be determined. Ends the report of the Civil Economic Standing Committee. 〔Chairman of the Civil Economic Standing Committee Hiroshi altar〕
○Chairperson (Kiichi Takino) Next, Mr. Kunio Asagawa, Managing Director of教ism and Welfare Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of教ism and Welfare Kunio Asagawa Speakers〕
◆I would like to report the progress and results of the examination for one proposal and one statement attached to the教ist Welfare Standing Committee. First of all, I would like to inform you about the establishment of an ordinance that amends part of the dementia-sensitive nursing care allowance payment ordinance in Narashino City. This plan is intended to revise the amount of nursing allowance in this city as the amendment of the subsidy unit price of Chiba Prefecture's severe dementia nursing allowance business expenses. In addition, the amount is to raise the city alone to the subsidy unit price of the prefecture while emphasizing home welfare, and the current monthly 2,650 yen is 120,000,100 yen, and it is intended to raise it retrospectively on April 1, 1991. In this draft review, the committee members questioned whether the authorities are aware of the actual situation of the dementia-senior in the city and its future estimates, and the status of the allowance payment in each prefecture. After the Q&A session, there was no discussion on the proposal, and the results of the decision were decided to be accepted by all. Next, I would like to express my、. I would like to express my affirmation to ask for a significant increase in private grants such as the first express special subsidy. In order to realize the intrinsic education requirements of the pre、ural citizens, the principal of the Chiba Prefectural Association of Private Schools and Staffs, the principal of the 教posium called for submission of opinions to countries and prefectures to reduce the burden of the parent and to correct the tolerance of educational conditions. First of all, as set forth in Article 24 of the Act on 。ing and Operation of Local Education 。, the administration of the private school is made by the Governor Bureau or the prefecture, and the subsidy from the country is calculated in the pre。ural expenses. Although it is not managed as a city authority, it is impossible to provide a clear answer, but it was explained by hand about the annual trend of the supplementary unit price per student from high school to kindergarten in private school and the request amount from the Ministry of Education in the country's budget request. After the conclusion of Q&A, the grants for the private school of the country and the prefecture are increasing year by year according to the explanation of the authorities. Although the request for this current situation is limited to the student’s short-term and period, I think it is important to make a conclusion as a committee when it is not clear about future education policies, realization of 35 students, and the policy of school scale optimization etc.動ing the period of careful screening, we have submitted a co ation decision that we would like to continue reviewing this statement. However, as a result of the decision, we have been denied by a few成s. In the discussion, you can understand the efforts of the country that has increased private grants year by year, but consider the aspect of private education, and consider the social situation, etc., and think that it should be grant to the extent that you do not need to raise the tuition. Therefore, the wish of this陳 is a controversial argument that is reasonable, and after the completion of this情, the majority of the情s decided to adopt it. The report of the教ist Welfare Standing Committee has ended. 〔Chairman of教ism and Welfare Kunio Asakawa altar〕
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) This is a question of the current chairperson's report. Do you have any questions? --27
I would like to ask one of the spontaneous chairpersons of spontaneous welfare, but I would like to ask for a significant increase in private grants, but I don’t object to this, but in this statement, I’m saying, “I have a big financial problem and have faced an unprecedented crisis,” but I don’t hear that the financial problem of private spontaneous school was published, but I assume that the financial grants were not reviewed by the committee. I think that it is a mys that I am not allowed because it is education in the so-called sanctuary of education, but if it is financially difficult, I should help the national tax because I am not good at publishing the current state of finance.
○President (Kiichi Tamachi) Just ask for answers to the question of the present. Mr. Kunio Asagawa, Chairman of the Board of Education Home
◆Writing Committee Chair (Kunio Asakawa) I would like to answer to the questions of the present. The Committee did not have any such suspicions.
○President: Kiyoichi Tamachi Is there anything else? ---Mr. Saburo Morita
◆About the Proposal No. 2 of Morita Saburo-kun...... [There are still people who call it]
◆No.13 (Morita Saburo) Thank you.
○President: Kiyoichi Tamachi No doubt. [There is a person called "None"]
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) I acknowledge that there is no doubt. Q&A More discussions. There is a notification, so it is allowed to say from the communist. First, Masayuki Kokura, 30th. Thank you for your interest. [No.30 Masayuki Kokura]
◆No.30 (Masayuki Kokura) I will discuss the reconcil。 of the building of the former Narashino movie theater No.40 and land transfer etc. on behalf of the public party. On May 18, 1989, all of the parties have decided to make a request for surrendering of the land for performing arts. On October 4, 1990, the representative meeting was held. After that, there is no explanation of the parliament, the representative meeting was held on June 3 just before the parliament, and the history of the situation that was already prepared as a proposal is not convinced. The former third-party 政権 seems to beだd by the new administration, but I think that it is necessary to handle it carefully as a very important case. In addition, in the case of reconcil、 clause 8, the projection drama is noted that the reimbursement claim is waived on the date of settlement, for the usage fee of 467,287 yen paid to the city on the land of the projection drama. In 31, this project has been revealed from the borrowing relationship of the contract for the first year in 31, but it must be noted that there was no legal procedure in the past 30 years. Therefore, we will discuss the opposite of the proposal. More [No.30 Masayuki Kokura's altar]
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) Next, I would like to give a lecture by Hiroyuki Miyamoto. [No.2 Hiroyuki Miyamoto]
◆No. 2 (Hiroyuki Miyamoto) We will discuss the settlement of the settlement concerning the construction of the former Narashino movie theater, land transfer etc. In the first place, I visited the Narashino movie theater in 5th-chome, but I heard that this land is a land that gave the world to the opening of a cinema in Narashino City, which was countryside in 31. The movie theater has been closed since around 51 years. It is the best place around the movie theater. It is natural that it should be used for urban development in Narashino City, as long as it is not available as a cinema. There are two words for the return, and it seems that there was a協 to solve it in 5 to 5 between the city and the theater at that time in 1988. However, the report of the city’s property survey committee was consulted, but it was unsuitable. After that, both parties are litigating, but this March court indicates a settlement of settlements between 8 and 2 and this is considered to be the best. In order not to cause inappropriate and nuisance to the citizens, we should judge from various angles as the representative of the citizens and be evaluated later that the resolution was correct. In this parliament, there is a problem that you have to solve the problem of residency at a Chinese restaurant even if you can prolong the trial more than this, and it takes longer than 5 years or 10 years, and it can be a result of further risk. As I had the opposite discussion, there was a problem with the administrative side, but this is also a deliberation of the executive department. It is not unavoidable to 愛bute 20% of the movie from the current land situation. Depending on the place you hear, I heard that the theater side was a complaint at 20%. If you think that you can take more time to return the whole, and you may have a greater risk. In addition, we would like to express our app。。 to the revitalization of the Okubo Shopping Street or to the development of the Okubo Station. In addition, we will discuss the request for a petition to be a city park with the site of the Chiba University 研究所atories, the former No.3. For the problem of the former Chiba University Activity Research Institute site, we hope that you will be able to preserve the green as much as possible by the green master plan for the smallest park and the spring area. In Q&A, there was a strong saying that you do not buy or 。 if you have the intention of selling land to Okura. Currently, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism has been working on the construction of a public servant’s residence, so we would like to pray for the rest of the citizens as soon as possible. [No.2 Hiroyuki Miyamoto altar]
○President (Kiichi Tamachi) Next, Keiji Seki, No. 23. Thank you for your interest. [No.23 Keiji Seki]
◆No.23 (Seki Katsura Ji-kun) I will discuss the Japanese産ist Party. We will discuss the39position of the Ordinance to amend part of the Proposal No. 39 Narashino City National Health Insurance Ordinance. Proposal to amend part of the Narashino City National Health Insurance Ordinance is the main content to raise the maximum amount from 40 to 42 million yen. The government has reduced subsidies to the National Health Insurance System under the name of administrative reform. Aid rate of the country has been reduced from 45% to 38.5% of medical expenses. With the reduction of the auxiliary rate, the city has been reducing the grant of 149,000 yen since 60. This year, it has become 1,2900 million yen. The insurance premium for ins has been increased as it is not possible to reduce subsidies. The National Health Insurance System was born in order to improve the health of business, social security and national health, and the national responsibility has been clarified to achieve the purpose. Reduction of subsidies in the country is the threat of the system itself, and should be revived as follows. In addition, it is a premium that is very high regardless of the burden of ins、 persons such as health insurance, and the reduction of national health insurance premium is urgent. In order to lower this high insurance premium, it is necessary to remove the fund of the current National Health Insurance and turn it to lower the national health insurance premium. End the論position request. , we will discuss the opinions of the Japanese映画ist Party in order to determine the settlement of settlements related to the billing of the building and land transfer etc. of the former Narashino movie theater. This proposal is intended for the landscaping of the former Narashino movie theater site, etc., by the court of the case during the litigation, the settlement condition is presented and the approval is requested. The cause of such a situation is that the city did not take legal refusal procedure at the time the contract period due to the leasehold law has expired. In this way, the responsibility is very important. This site is expected to be resolved early in order to maintain the surroundings of Oishida Station. It is not appropriate to change the current situation, and should be addressed to settlement. We will discuss the management and disposal of public property in the future with the strict attitude of the administrative authorities. 〔#23 Keiji Seki altar〕
○The discussion was over the chairperson (Kiichi Tamachi). Is there any other discussion? ---6 Seiichi Tachizaki Thank you for your interest. [No.6: Seiichi Tachizaki]
◆No.6 (Mr.崎ichi Tachizaki) I will discuss the reconcil。 of the building of the former Narashino movie theater No.40 and the settlement of land and the like. One-。rd of the former Narashino movie theater city is the opposite to transfer to the theater for free. This issue has been discussed in the parliament until today, and the transfer of the city’s land for free is not responsible for conflicting with the unauthorised lending of the land under Article 238, 5 of the local autonomy law and 612 of the civil law. In the management of this city, Narashino City has raised a number of operational problems. First of all, the problem is that Narashino City has given the right to insist on borrowing rights to the theater, because the former Narashino Film Theater, at the time of 60 years, claims to return the movie theater as soon as the movie theater was closed. After that, the city has announced an opinion on the movie theater in Narashino in 62. When I look at this content, the borrowing rights of 9 pages were 。d by the other person, the content of the Narashino movie theater. The attitude of this land to protect the property of citizens as a public use is not found in this opinion, and therefore, the interpretation of the law based on the provisions of Article 238 of the local autonomy law was not written in this opinion. Based on this opinion, the city has made an amazing proposal to transfer one-half of the same land to a theater for free. The Committee returned to the white paper in order to make a reply with inappropriate to the outside director. After that, after a trial of what the Narashino movie theater side claims to be a leasehold, the Narashino City finally started a trial for a full return, but this was the reason that it was lost late. In the course of this series, the attitude to protect the property of citizens in the city of Narashino is very ambiguous, and it is actually a story of the fact that it was actually a good addition to management and operation if it is論. In addition, the fact that there was a store for residential and commercial use without permission to the city, which is the landlord, in the 394 tsubo area of the city, which has reached today is a strictly conflicting illegal act in Article 612 of the Civil Code. Even if you take one of this problem, it is impossible to claim that there is a leasehold right on the theater side, and it is a language barrier. You must not say that the administrative responsibility of the city that has been conscious of this is a very problem. We say that it is very difficult to get out of the people who already live, but in this regard, we provide municipal housing to the parties, etc., and the solution is むこと. In addition, it is possible if the city will compensate for its business in some way for the tenants of the store in the form of goodwill. It is enough to make a full return by solving this thing. The unit price per tsubo of the land is expected to be 7 million yen in the story of the neighboring real estate agent. In such a case, the provision of about 80 tsubo is that it will provide the city’s assets reaching 56,000 million yen to anyone who has no right. Is it possible to provide such a huge asset? As shown in this way, it will leave a large cata phic root of the city in the future. In the future, the city of Narashino rents a variety of locals, but I think that this is definitely a tail. Therefore, it is a object against the Proposal No. 40. More 〔No.6 Seiichi Tachizaki altar〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) [There is a person called "None"]
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) I acknowledge that there is no discussion. This will end the discussion. In this case, there is a request. Of the documents distributed to the original, in the report of the committee examination results table, the "Expressive Special Grant Clouds" in the first issue of the acceptance number, but this is the error of "Express Term", so I would like to ask for correction. I will go to the採. First, we will issue No. 38 of the proposal. The chairperson's report on the proposal is a decision. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕
○Chairperson (Kiichi Takita) Therefore, the proposal No. 38 was accepted as the original proposal. Next, we will decide the Proposal No. 39. The chairperson's report on the proposal is a decision. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the Proposal No. 39 was accepted as the original proposal. Next, we will issue the proposal No. 40. The chairperson's report on the proposal is a decision. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the Proposal No. 40 was accepted as the original proposal. Next, we will decide the Proposal No. 41. The report of the chairperson to this proposal is consented. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the Proposal No. 41 has decided to agree to this. Next, we will decide the Proposal No. 42. The report of the chairperson to this proposal is consented. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the Proposal No. 42 has decided to agree to this. Next, we will issue No. 43 and No. 47 of the proposal. The chairperson's report on the proposal 5 is determined. The proposal 5 will ask for the raising of you who agrees to make a decision as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕
○Chairperson (Kiichi Takita) Therefore, 5 of this proposal was decided. Next, we will decide on the request and情. First of all, we will determine the communication that seeks a large increase in private grants, such as a special grant for the first express reduction of the number. The chairperson's report on this情 is adopted. We will ask for the 立 of you who agrees to make this statement as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕
○President (Kiichi Takino) I will not be again. 〔Priorship〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) is a large number of standing. Therefore, I decided to adopt the first passerative number. Next, we will採pose the capacity reduction plan of the national public official No. 2 of the passive number, and we will determine the affirmation of the establishment of biological government and the realization of the生活 citizens and residents. The report of the chairperson for this情 is not accepted. We will advise you to adopt this情. We will ask for the start of each of you who agrees to adopt the陳. 〔Priorship〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) is a few standing. Therefore, I decided to make the acceptance number No. 2 is not accepted. Next, we will grant a petition to the city park of Chiba University Active Research Institute, the former number No.3. The chairperson's report on this request is accepted. We will ask for the 立 of you who agrees to resolve this request as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕
○Chairperson (Kiichi Takita) Therefore, we decided to send the accepted number No.3. --- --- ---
△About the Proposal No. 1 and Proposal No. 2 (Proposal of Reason - Approval)
○President (Kiichi Takino) The agenda of the date 3, proposal 1 and proposal 2 will be the agenda. We will ask the applicant to explain the reason for the proposal. First, No.31 Junhei Yoshida. Thank you for your interest. [No.31 Junhei Yoshida]
◆31 (Yoshida Junpei) Opinions against the introduction of the proposal No. 1 small election system and political party law The above proposal will be submitted in with the provisions of Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Rules. June 28, 1991 Mr. Kiyoichi Nagata, Chairman of Narashino City Council. The presenter is Mr. Junhei Yoshida, a member of the Council of Narashino City, and the acclaimer will be omitted, but Mr. Shizuko Kimura, Katsuraji Dono, Nobusha Dobaba, Kazuo Domiyauchi, Tetsutoshi Domo, Kumiko Dotatsumi, Hisae Dotarabe, and Masayuki Dokokura. The contents of opinions that are against the introduction of the small-electoral ward system and political party law will be explained by you. The private party decides a political reform-related bill skeleton centering on the adoption of a sub-electoral delegation system in the House of Representatives election system, receiving a delegation of the Election System Council, and calling a temporary会 in late July to introduce it at once. A small-electoral zone system is a mechanism to create a system that can monopolize 80% of the seats of the parliament to the parliament. The strong demands of the citizens are to make fundamental corrections to the constant correction of less than one to two in the current election system, so that it is clear even in the national meeting resolution and the constant disparity judgment. In addition, public grants to political parties are invasive of the freedom of “corporation,” which is guaranteed by the Const、tion, to determine the qualification requirements of the Party as a subsidy. Therefore, the City Council is strongly opposed to the introduction of small-electoral and political parties. The above shall be submitted in with the provisions of Article 99-2 of the Local Autonomous Law. This proposal shall be submitted to the Prime Minister, the Minister of Self-Government and other government agencies. Thank you for your understanding. [No.31 Junhei Yoshida altar]
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) Next, Kunio Asagawa No. 21. Thank you for your interest. [No.21 Kunio Asagawa]
◆21 (Kunio Asakawa) Proposal No.2 express-life special grant, etc. The above proposal shall be submitted in with the provisions of Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Regulation. June 28, 1991 Mr. Kiyoshi Nagata, Chairman of the Narashino City Council. Submitted by Kunio Asagawa, Parliamentary Member of Narashino City. We will abide by the acclaim. Shizuko Kimura, Tomio Dotabata, Kumiko Dotatsu, and Kunio Domiura. We will explain the reason for the proposal by reading the draft that is distributed to the original. An opinion book that seeks a large increase in private grants, such as a short-term special grant. Today, there is a great place for private education, as Japanese education is said to be “I can’t speak to me.” Nevertheless, the budget of private relations in the country continues to be reduced and suppressed and has not yet been recovered until today. Such reductions and suppression are convened to raise tuition costs, and it is believed that the graduation of educational conditions between public and private is further enlarged. These facts are obviously beyond the limits of the tuition cost of the father and her mother, and at the same time significantly impaired the principles of equal education opportunities, making it even more difficult to learn about private education that has reached the student’s short-term. However, there is a great opportunity to develop and improve the educational conditions, and the country and the prefecture are responsible for taking special grants for the short-term to ensure the education that each student has reached. Accordingly, the government and the pre ural government recognizes the importance of the role of private education in public education, and a large increase in financial support as well as the tolerance of the father and mother’s burden and education conditions in the student’s rapid reduction period, we strongly ask for special grants for the rapid reduction period. Submit an opinion form in with the provisions of Article 99, Paragraph 2 of the Local Autonomous Law. Reason for proposal. This proposal shall be submitted to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, as well as to government agencies and prefectures. Thank you for your understanding. 〔21 Kunio Asagawa altar〕
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) This is more questionable. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. Do you have any questions? ---Mr. Saburo Morita
◆I will ask about the Proposal No. 2 of Morita Saburo. I heard that I would like to grant a tuition to a good time even if I didn’t raise the tuition fee in the previous chairperson report, but I asked only one point, but when I don’t need to raise the tuition, what do I judge? We will ask you only one item.
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) We will ask for the answer to the present question. Submitted by Kunio Asagawa.
◆No.21 (Kunio Asakawa) For example, I do not make such a statement in the proposal, but it is a good idea, so it is a report of the chairperson earlier, and I do not have any text in the proposal this time, so I will deduct the answer for that.
○President: Kiyoichi Tamachi ---6 Seiichi Tachizaki
◆6 (Tachisaki Seiichi-kun) I will ask about the first proposal, but I think that the proposal is very likely to be introduced about the small election system, but at the same time there is a illusion such as the media and the news that this small election system is going through at a national meeting, and many people are watching it as such.
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) Request answer. Submitted by Junhei Yoshida.
◆No.31 (Seihei Yoshida) There is a very severe situation as there was a question content of the Q&A. The skeleton of the 骨 draft is decided to make a party decision, and in the beginning of August, it is a situation where you can gather extraordinary会 and introduce it at once. In that sense, there is a very severe situation, but this small-electoral zone system is in 1956, and sometimes it was proposed at the time of Hatoyama Cabinet. I saw a resolution at the House of Representatives at this time, but the House of Councillors was not accepted, and it was again 採択, and in 48, it was Tanaka Cabinet. However, this is a small election system called Kakumandar, but there is a course that this was abandoned before the会position of the National Sports. Even if we look at such situations, I feel that if we raise such a resolution from each city, and we are also 盛りouraging the national movement, we can make a draft.
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) No.6 Seiichi Tachizaki
◆No.6 (Tachisaki Seiichi) I think that the political party of the person who proposes 80% of the seats in the 、 discount vote in this statement is occupied, but is this ground? I would like to ask you how much you will have, in this 40% voucher, that is, 80% of the seats will be occupied by the party.
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) Request answer. Submitted by Junhei Yoshida.
◆No.31 (Yoshida Junpei) This is based on the number of votes taken in the last three years of elections, and the number of votes can be occupied by the proposed proposal. For example, in the case of a self-confidential party, the number is 291 of the seats, 68 and 359 of the proportional representatives. Therefore, the occupancy rate is 76.2%, about 80%, and this is the result. This also refers to the current self-confidential vote rate, the average score rate for the last three years is 47.4%, so it is obviously pointing to the contents of this, which is gaining 80% of the votes on the 4 percent score.
○President: Kiyoichi Tamachi 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕
○Are you a chairperson? ---Issei Aihara 27.
◆I would like to ask about the Proposal No. 1 of the Proposal No. 27 (Issei-ku Aihara), but we don’t have the opportunity to know the details of this small election system except in the newspaper. The proposed party is now considered to be a party decision, but it is a reform of an制度 important system of choosing a member of the State Legislation. Of course, it is still unclear that you may not be able to discuss between parties and submit to the会. Although it is a confrontation or objection in one local parliament at that stage, I think it is a very deliberate material, and it is very poor, and we do not know what is the actual situation. So, if you are going to do this deliberation after submission to the会, you must consider it as a member of any angle and make a deliberation, but I can’t understand it a little, but I can’t explain it. [There is a person who speaks me]
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) I wish quietly. Submitted by Junhei Yoshida.
◆No.31 (Yoshida Junpei-kun) But at the time that the bill has not yet been revealed before the citizens, there was an opinion that it is a good idea to make such a decision in the local parliament. However, there are some parts that have already been reported on the general newspaper or on TV. The skeleton of political reform-related bills written in this opinion by governments and private parties is made of three bills. One is the revision of the public election law, the other is the amendment of the Poli Fund Amendment Act, or the other is the political party law, the political party grant draft, and this three is the skeleton. For example, in the case of a public election law, the current mid-electoral ward system, i.e. the three-electoral ward and five-person constant, and in case of a small-electoral ward system, the constant is one. In the case of a small election system, a small election system is one vote, and one vote in the proportional representative election is one vote. Then the constant is the form of current 512 to 471. In addition, in relation to the Poli Capital Regulation Act, the current Parliamentarians are a major problem in the relationship with the so-called Party Law, but this is the content of this article, “regarding the status requirements of the Party as a subsidy is invade the freedom of the const。tion guaranteed by the const。tion”. In other words, it is not recognized as a political party if it is from a political party, a social party, a public party or a republic party, a private party, a civil party and a civilian party, or a political party of other realities. For example, sports peace party, Sarahman党 party, and progress party are not recognized as a political party.
○President: Kiyoichi Tamachi [There are people who call "I don't know well"]
Q: Do you have any questions? [There is a person called "None"]
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) I acknowledge that there is no doubt. Q&A Thank you for your understanding. As for the proposal No.1 and Proposal No.2, we would like to omit the deposit of the Committee according to the provisions of Article 37, Paragraph 2 of the Conference Rules. Is there any objection to this? 〔No objection〕
○Chairperson (Kiichi Takino) Therefore, the proposal No. 1 and proposal No. 2 were decided to omit the commission. More discussions. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. No discussions? [There is a person called "None"]
○Chair (Kiichi Takino) I acknowledge that there is no discussion. This will end the discussion. I will go to the採. First, we will decide the first proposal. This plan requires you to decide according to the original plan. 〔Priorship〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the first proposal was accepted as the original proposal. Next, we will decide the second issue. This plan requires you to decide according to the original plan. 〔Priorship〕
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the proposal No. 2 was accepted as the original proposal. All proceedings submitted to the Council have been closed. --- --- ---
△Mr. Suzuki
○President (Kiichi Takino) We will forgive you from Junichiro Toba, who has been involved in the election of the assistant and the recr。ing of the recr。ing director. First, Mr. Suzuki Thank you for your interest. 〔Mr. Suzuki’s presentation〕
◎ (Suzuki Kozo) I would like to thank you for your very valuable time and thank you for your message. I have been resigned to the assistant for your consent, but now I have a sense of pain in the weight of the responsibility. For the past 4 years, I have been able to do some job for the athlete. I would like to express my sincere app。。 and encouragement. Since we have been re ed as a supporter, we will make the best effort to promote the city government. Thank you for your continued support and encouragement. Thank you very much. (Applause) [Suzuki Kozo-kun altar] ------
Junichiro Toba
Next, I would like to give a lecture by Junichiro Toba. 〔Junichiro Toba Speaker〕
◎ (Junichiro Toba) I would like to express my gra。 to the chairperson. Thank you very much for your support. I am very grateful to me, and at the same time I am feeling the seriousness of the responsibility. I have been working as a job for the past 4 years, but I have been involved in accounting work for cash and storage, but I still know that there are many things that I have not yet. I would like to work hard to meet the expectations of the members of the first citizen. Thank you for your understanding. Thank you. (Applause) [Junichiro Toba] ------
△
○The chairperson (Kiichi Takino), followed by a request that you want toつ from you, so forgive it. Thank you for your interest. 〔 Yukun Araki〕
◎ I would like to thank you for the closing of the second regular meeting in 1991. We would like to express our sincere app。。 for the deliberation of the 10 proposals, which were proposed for the first time, for the long term of the convocation on June 12th. We will sincerely accept opinions, opinions, etc. that have been made in the process of deliberation. We are committed to future city administration. We are committed to 賛tivating the vitality, ease and vitality of Narashino. It is as soon as we ask for guidance of each member. The rainy season is coming soon. It will be a hot summer, but I would like to ask you to have more guidance and cooperation in the management of the city government. Thank you very much. (Applause) 〔 Yuki Aragi altar〕------
Close
○Chair (Kiichi Tamachi) We will close the second regular meeting of Narashino City Council in 1991. 2.44 p.m. signed by the provisions of Article 123, Paragraph 2 of the Local Autonomous Law. Michiko Hotsuki, Kunio Asakawa