chiholog - 地方議会議事録横断検索

59 59 59 59 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Opens today's meeting. There are 32 attendees. The meeting was established. --- --- --- △Reports ○Chairperson (Issei Aihara) At this time, we will report various kinds of things. First of all, we received a report of the monthly payment inspection on June 20 of the Audit Committee. Next, the proposal No.2 from 8 Baba Shinshakyangai was submitted and accepted by the same Baba Shinshakyangai No.3 from 7 Baba Shinshakyangai. ---59意見 (Second Regular Meeting of the Narashino City Council in 1984) Proposal No.2 The above proposal will be submitted in。 with the provisions of Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Regulations as part of the Health Insurance Act. On June 25, 1984, Mr. Kazuo Aihara, Chair of the Council of Narashino City, Masashi Baba, Appra of the Council of Narashino City, Junhei Yoshida 〃 Shizuko Kimura 〃 〃 〃 Teruo Ichikaku 〃 Tetsuro Saito 〃 Tobari 〃 Kazuo Miyauchi 〃 Naoshi Iwa 〃 Masashi SUZ "Revision of a part of the health insurance law, etc." In particular, the reduction of the individual’s benefits, the reduction of the self-payment limit of medical expenses, and the reduction of the insurance benefits referred to as the “医療 standard” are the機会 of the national burden, and the opportunity to receive medical care is taken. In addition, the re、ement medical system with no burden on the nation’s neighbourhood, and the reduction of the unilateral auxiliary rate to the municipal government’s neighbourhood are directly linked to the increase of insurance premiums. Therefore, we strongly request the withdrawal of the bill. In addition, we will submit an opinion form in with the provisions of Article 99. The reason for the proposal of Kazuyoshi Aihara, Chairman of the Council of Narashino City, is to submit the opinions of the title to government agencies. ---59意見 (Second Regular Meeting of the Narashino City Council in 1984) Proposal No.3 Proposal of Proposal, Thoughts, and Opinions against the Government Act on the Freedom of the Company shall be submitted in条 with Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Rules. On June 25, 1984, Mr. Kazuo Aihara, Chairman of the Council of Narashino City, 59, Nobuo Baba, Prosper of the Council of Narashino City, Junhei Yoshida 〃 Shizuko Kimura 〃 〃 Teruo Ichikaku 〃 Tetsuro Saito 〃 〃 Tobari Sato 〃 Kazuo Miyauchi 〃 Naoyoshi Iwa affirmation, thought, and freedom of the association, the opinion of the politic Party Law, the const。。。。ential meeting of Nakatsukuni, According to the “Yoshimura Proposal,” the government’s policy is to eliminate minority parties, and to control political activities, such as the number of people in the country, the number of votes, and the number of people in the party. This is the opposite of the history of social progress. Before the war, the sanctuary, organization, and individuals whose mission is to “renovate the nation” was established as one of the greatest crimes, and all parties, groups, and individuals who claim critical political parties, lords and socialism to the emperor. After World War II, the Security Management Act was destroyed as a contrary to the fundamental principles of democracy, and the present Const、tion was established. The politician law is not tolerated as the principle of this const tion and the fundamental human rights, freedom of belief and freedom of association. Therefore, governments and political associations are strongly demanded not to be subject to any consultation or enactment of the Party Law. In addition, we will submit an opinion form in with the provisions of Article 99. The reason for the proposal of Kazuyoshi Aihara, Chairman of the Council of Narashino City, is to submit the opinions of the title to government agencies. --- --- --- ○President (Issei Aihara) This will end the report. This is the day of the meeting. --- --- --- △No of the meeting signing member ○President (Issei Aihara) Nominates the meeting member's schedule 1st. In with the provisions of Article 81 of the Conference Rules, the Council shall nominate No. 6 No. Baba Shinzoku and No. 7 No. 8 Miyoko Hozuki. --- --- --- △ Proposal No. 36, No. 40, No. 22, No. 24 (Chairman's Report) ○President (Issei Aihara) Date No.2, Proposal No.36, Proposal No.40 and Application No.22 and Application No.24 On June 20, 1984, Mr. Kazuyoshi Aihara, Chairman of the Council of Narashino City, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Teruo Ichikaku, Chairman of the Board of Directors, will report the incident to the Committee as follows. Copyright (C) 2009-2016 The Board of Directors. All Rights Reserved. 10359 5959 June 20, 5959 Keiichiro Hattori Committee Review Report The case of the incident attached to this committee is determined as follows, and it will be reported according to Article 103 of the Conference Rules. Appropriately requesting opinions on the recommendation of the Commissioner for Human Rights No. 38 of the draft remarks as a result of the number review of the article. Appropriately requesting opinions on the recommendation of the Commissioner for Human Rights No. 39 of the Proposal. ○Chairperson (Issei Aihara) First of all, Mr. Tsuruo Shikaku, the chairperson of the general、. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of General Affairs, Tsuruo Ichikaku’s Speaker〕 ◆I would like to report the progress and results of the examination for two proposals, one request, and one statement attached to the General Affairs Standing Committee. First of all, we would like to express our request for approval of the case which was dis。 of the proposal No. 36 (the establishment of the Ordinance to amend part of the Narashino City Tax Ordinance). This proposal is to be dis、 of in、 with the provisions of Article 179, Paragraph 1 of the Local Tax Act, etc., which was published on March 31, 2017. The taxation limit of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the taxable value of the corporate citizen tax. According to the answers of the authorities, the expected decline of 1 to 3 is 2,648 million yen, and the breakdown of 1 is 120,992, 2,523 million yen, 3,273 of the corresponding person, 570 million yen, 668 of the non-taxable limit, 203, 3, 338 million yen. In addition, it is expected that the expected increase by 09 is expected to increase by 4,093 million yen and 462 million yen. In addition, after the active Q&A session has been repeated, there is a論position from one member, and it has decided that it should be approved with a large number of決s. Next, we would like to inform you about the establishment of the Ordinance to amend part of the Proposal No. 37 Narashino City Fire Prevention Ordinance. This proposal is改正 with the amendment of the regulations of the country. The first part of the amendment is the provisions for safe isolation of fire prevention in the case of installing gas fuel, equipment for using liquid fuel, and equipment. The second part is the provisions for the百貨店 of smoking in department stores, etc., and the third part is to renew the storage or handling of 風 resins with properties that exud 燃mmable gas in the atmosphere under normal pressure of special comb。ibles. In the partial amendment of this Ordinance, residents will be promoted by public relations, etc., and related companies will be promoted by holding lectures etc. I agreed to the explanation of the authorities, and decided to be accepted according to the original proposal with the appraisal of all. Next, I would like to express my affirmation to request submission of opinions that are against the port of the ship of Tomahawk. There was a debate on the opposite, from the standpoint of praise, and the result of the vote was decided to be unaccepted. The end is a request to the government to request an opinion on the enactment of the "Gender Employment Equality Law" that is effective against the労position of the労 Standard Act No. 24. This request was made by a member of the committee, and it was decided that it was rejected by a few of the採s. We will close the report of the General Affairs Standing Committee. 〔Chairman of General Affairs, Tetsuo Ichikaku altar〕 ○Chairperson (Issei Aihara) Next, Mr. Kikuko Tanaka, Senior Chairman of Construction. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of Construction Executive Committee Kikuko Tanaka Speaker〕 ◆Construction Chair (Kikuko Tanaka) I would like to report on the course of the examination and the results of the application to make the surroundings of the rose garden to the pre。ural park with the application No. 22 that was attached to the construction work committee. This petition is that it is necessary to set up and protect the wild birds as a sanctuary, and to set up the area around the rose garden。acent to it as a pre。ural park. In addition, this issue has been made a request for correction of a partial statement of the request by the request representative on June 15, and the decision is made first. The committee conducted a field survey on this project last time, and examined the maintenance plan by the authorities of the Pol、 Prevention Business Group, but the project of the Tanizu Yuen site development and the maintenance plan of dried was liquid, so it was a continuous review. The examination was conducted based on the general question concerning the development of the Tanizu Yuen site held at this meeting. In the judging process, one committee member has taken a position to fill in the city council in the past. Based on the relationship between the rose garden and the drafting plan of the Yazu Yuen site development held at this regular meeting, it is important to cope with the situation for a while, and the movement to be reco。ed was submitted, but it was determined by the minority. In addition, from the standpoint of supporting this project, there are various discussions at this meeting, such as Tanizu drought, but from the financial situation of the city, it is best to leave the park that citizens want depending on the cost of the prefecture. In addition, from another member, the current financial situation of this city, I would like to respect the desire of this petition in the sense that it will charge the cost of the country and the prefecture as much as possible and lighten the financial burden of the city. After the conclusion of the discussion, we decided to send the proposal with a large number of support. Ends the report of the construction permanent committee. 〔Construction Chair Kikuko Tanaka altar〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Next, Mr. Keiichiro Hattori, Chairman of the Civil Welfare Standing Committee. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of the Civil Welfare Permanent Committee Keiichiro Hattori〕 ◆I would like to report the progress and results of the examination for three proposals sent to the Civil Welfare Standing Committee (Keiichiro Hattori). First of all, I would like to ask for opinions about the recommendation of the proposal No. 38 and the proposal No. 39 and the two human rights defenders. The two proposals are the term of resignation of Mr. Yuyuki Shimizu and Mr. Ichiro Ishii, a member of the Human Rights Protection Committee, as of July 31, 1984. As for this proposal, the Committee has questioned whether such personnel matters will be selected according to the recommendation criteria, and whether the recommendation is held at the time of the recommendation, and acknowledged the response of the authorities to this, and decided to be suitable for both Mrs. Next, we would like to inform you about the establishment of an ordinance to amend part of the 40th Narashino National Health Insurance Ordinance. In、 with the amendment of parent laws, etc., the plan is to raise the limit of the insurance premium and change the calculation method related to the reduction of insurance premium. In the judging, the members first discussed whether the increase of 70,000 yen is higher or lower than the authorities, but this is not the amount determined to take accounting as an executive, but according to the policy that conforms to the national standards. As for the current situation of insurance premium immunity in 28 cities under the prefecture, the city with a limit of 350,000 yen is 21 cities in the city, 2.3 million yen, Noda city, Abiko city, 27 million yen to 280,000 yen, and the city with a year of national standard is the city of Ichikawa city and Michiyama city, and the city with the current level of 280,000 yen, Chiba city, Matsudo city and Kashiwa city. The number of households corresponding to the insurance premium limit of 350,000 yen after the amendment is6.82, which is 6.8% of the ins , and the deficit is about 480 million yen before the amendment. In addition, this deficit was a response that caused by the previous決算 year. In addition, there was a response from the authorities that the amendment of this Ordinance was also consulted with the National Council of Management of Japan, and the amendment proposal on May 31st was unavoidable. In addition, there is a question of the contents of the loss of insurance premium due to the increase of each income deduction, or the presence or absence of an議 to the municipal financial problem social gathering, etc. After the Q&A session, once a member has passed the National Health Insurance Law, it is considered to be a burden of double triples for citizens. Therefore, the increase of this課enditure limit is a part of the health insurance law reform, and there is a saying that it is the opposite from the position to protect life and life. We will close the report of the civil welfare permanent committee. 〔Chairman of Civil Welfare, Keiichiro Hattori descent〕 ○President (Issei Aihara) Next, the amendment was submitted to the Proposal No. 40 from Miyoko Hozuki. ---40。 Proposal No. 40 Enactment of Ordinances to Amend Part of the National Health Insurance Ordinances of Narashino City. Amendments to the above Proposal shall be submitted in。 with the provisions of Article 115-2 of the Local Autonomous Law and Article 17 of the Conference Rules. On June 24, 1984, Mr. Kazumasa Aihara, Chair of the Council of Narashino City, Submitted by Mr. Miyoko Hotsuki, Compliant of the Council of Narashino City, Hirofumi Hirakawa 〃 Ryugo Tsushima 〃 〃 〃 Tetsuo Shimahata Amendment Proposal No. 40 of Narashino City National Health Insurance Ordinance amendments as follows. Change "280,000 yen" to "350,000 yen" in paragraph 2 of Article 11. --- --- --- ○Chair (Issei Aihara) In this case, we will ask for a description of the person submitting the motion. Mr. Michiko Hozuki Thank you for your interest. [Participate in 7: Mr. Misako Hotsuki] ◆No.7 (Mr. Michiko Hozuki) We will submit a draft amendment to a part of the 40th Narashino National Health Insurance Ordinance.議ing the 40th proposal, the "280,000 yen" will be changed to "350,000 yen", and the "350,000 yen" will be changed to "315,000 yen". 〔No.7 Miyoko Hotsuki altar〕 ○Chairperson (Issei Aihara) This will enter a question of the current chairperson's report and revisions. Do you have any questions? No.5 Junhei Yoshida ◆No.5 (Yoshida Junpei) We have submitted a proposal for the Proposal No.40, but I have not explained the reason for the proposal, but I would like to explain the reason for the proposal.

○Chair (Issei Aihara) Mr. Misako Hozuki Home ◆No.7 (Miko Hotsuki) Yes. The original plan to raise 70,000 yen from 280,000 yen to 350,000 yen is considered to be a part of hierarchy, which leads to a sharp increase in burden. I think that it is desirable to revise it step by step, avoiding this sudden burden increase, and the raise width is 35,000 yen. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No. 5 Junhei Yoshida ◆No.5 (Yoshida Junhei) So, what kind of financial benefits do you make by this revision? In addition, I would like to give you a description of the relevant person, its financial scale, etc. in the original proposal. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hotsuki Miyoko-kun) The increase due to the expansion of the課ipment limit is 4,222,1 thousand yen depending on the original plan, and 2,8,8 thousand yen will be calculated according to the revision, and it will be a decrease of 1,720,3 thousand yen when the original plan is 350,000 yen. The number of households is 1,106 households in total, and 945 households in the case of 350,000 yen. ○Is there any other question? 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No.32 Akihiro Iioka ◆No.32 (Iioka Akihiro) I heard a report of the chairperson of the civil welfare resident committee of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, but I think that it was an unbelievable incident that I made a decision to reduce the burden of the ins、 person who is saved by a preferential treatment to the ins、 person due to the amendment of this proposal. However, I can’t think that the committee reviewed the proposal, which is a specialized committee, has decided to make a decision. I would like to ask the proposal. I would like to ask the doctor's meeting of the National Health Insurance Management Council, the doctor's meeting of the city, the pharmacist's association, the general users of National Health Insurance, and the advice of the National Health Insurance Management Council. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Do you ask to the organizer? ◆32 (Iioka Akihiro) Yes. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hogetsu Miyoko) The content of the advisory is a way of thinking about it, but this time, as I mentioned earlier, I would like to raise this step by step because it is a significant value too much while being aware of some hierarchies. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No.32 Akihiro Iioka ◆No.32 (Iioka Akihiro) The budget by the amendment was a doubt from the Yoshida member earlier, but in this review, it is 賄bery by repairing it from the previous year's transfer money. However, in the case of this draft decision, it becomes a deficit close to 50 million. How many alphanumeric characters will come when you make a correction plan? ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hotsuki Miyoko) 4,8 million yen will be 3,351 thousand yen if modified. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No.32 Akihiro Iioka ◆No.32 (Iioka Akihiro) How do you get the source of the goods from? This is due to the authority of the execution program, and I think that it is not possible to easily make the financial contributions, but what do you think about it? ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hogetsu Misako-kun) There was a story that I would like to charge the money, but for example, I would like to ask the authorities for it. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No.32 Akihiro Iioka ◆No.32 (Iioka Akihiro) The subject and科enditure are different from national accounting and general accounting. The conclusion that it should be easily supplemented from general accounting is not possible. So how will the hierarchy be made if it is corrected to 35,000 yen? ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hotsuki Miyoko) I think that it is an annual income, but I think that it is about 7 million yen annual income. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No.32 Akihiro Iioka ◆No.32 (Iioka Akihiro-kun) 70,000 yen is not im。 by upgrading the課ipment limit from 250,000 yen to 350,000 yen, but 30,000 yen is also good. What happens if I set 35,000 yen? ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆No.7 (Miko Hogetsu) 945 households. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No.32 Akihiro Iioka ◆No.32 (Iioka Akihiro) When the number of households is charged, how many people will be charged? I would like to answer by hierarchy. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆No.7 (Myoko Hogetsu) With an increase of 2,8 million yen by the課ipment limit, it is still ...... We will consider it to the authorities. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No.32 Akihiro Iioka ◆No.32 (Iioka Akihiro) According to the chairperson report of the Civil Welfare Committee, the chairperson report is not detailed in the question of this proposal. It is important to have a question of whether it is expensive or cheaper than 70,000 yen. In addition, if the health insurance bill is passed at the current会 meeting, it is the opposite because it is possible to reduce the government support. I don't say that it's cheaper than 70,000 yen in the process of the committee examination, but it's good. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Miko Hogetsu) The chairperson's report has been accepted. ○Is there any other question? No.12 Kazuo Miyauchi ◆No.12 (Isao Miyauchi) The proposal is to correct the part of paragraph 2 of Article 11. However, if the proposal is made from the executive department of this proposal, it is necessary to change the part other than the 10 columns of Article 11 to 350,000 yen. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hotsuki Miyoko-kun) It is a part that makes 250,000 yen 350,000 yen. ○President: Kazuo Miyauchi, 12 ◆12 (Isao Miyauchi) I say that it is all of the submitters, but I only write about Article 11-2 that was proposed here. [There is a person who speaks me] ○Please prepare the chairperson. Ms. Ms. Ms. Ms. Ms. Ms. Miki ◆No.7 (Miko Hotsuki) The executive department was submitted, so I wrote it according to this proposal. ○Are you a chairperson? It is good. Are there any other questions? 。 ◆No.6 (Baba Shinzoku-kun) I will take a little idea, but this time, the increase of the limit of the national health insurance premium proposed by the Council is a 70,000 to 350,000. Therefore, it is stipulated in the local tax law, but the basis set forth in the local tax law is that the limit of this national health insurance was raised according to the upper limit of the standard compensation month. There is such a way of thinking, but what is the basis for the idea of lowering it? If you want to lower it, you can pull it up. I would like to know why I made a 30,000 yen. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hogetsu Miyoko-kun) The basis is that it is a little too sharp as I explained the reason for the proposal earlier. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No. 6 No. Baba Shinsha. ◆No.6 (Baba Shinzoku) It is that there is no ground in the number that is 35,000 yen. Do you understand that there is no ground? ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hotsuki Miyoko) Please think that the basis is up to 70,000 yen once submitted by the authorities. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No. 6 No. Baba Shinsha. ◆It is No. 6 (Baba Shinzoku), so 70,000 yen indicates the origin. This is what if you increase 70,000 yen by 標準 the standard reward amount. In this revision, it is 35,000 yen, but 30,000 yen is the basis of this. If you want to lower it, make it to zero. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆No.7 (Ms. Misako Hotsuki) As we have been increasing several times since then, we have never been able to raise such a large scale. I would like to ask for a step up even if the number of households is small. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No. 6 No. Baba Shinsha. ◆No.6 (Baba Shinzoku) This March parliament has greatly raised public rates, and you have praised it. ○President (Issei Aihara) ◆No.6 (Baba Shinzoku) This proposal and the attitude of the person submitting the movement in the March parliament is a little private. I asked another question, but I found that 30,000 yen is not particularly ground. So I would like to accept the personality of the limited amount, but what does the limit mean? 〔There are people who call “I think I don’t know that far.” ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Please be sure to ask you. Silent. Ms. Ms. Ms. Ms. Ms. Ms. Miki ◆7 (Hotsuki Miyoko) As we proposed, it is as we suggested. ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No. 6 No. Baba Shinsha. ◆No.6 (Baba Shinshao-kun) The limit is, it is always to raise the insurance premium. Even if the insurance premium is raised, it is the limit to raise the limit in advance so that it can increase a lot. Did you know that? ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆No.7 (Miko Hotsuki) 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Issei Aihara) 30 Keiichiro Hattori I would like to ask the recipient of the amendment, but the limit is 35,000 yen. However, as I had a question earlier, there is a little uncompromising on the basis of this limit. However, if you want to ask one point is 35,000 yen, for example, 250,000 yen, the site of one area is 5,000 tsubo and 100,000 tsubo. I would like to ask you how much the annual salary is 315,000 yen. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆7 (Hogetsu Miyoko-kun) It is the answer as soon as possible. ○President (Issei Aihara) 30 Keiichiro Hattori ◆30 (Keiichiro Hattori) When the limit is 350,000, the site is 50 tsubo, the building is 30 tsubo and 10 years, and the annual income is 726 million, the annual income should be 35 million. I think that the annual income will be lower if it is 315,000 yen. If you do so, it is a response that is 720 million yen, but I think that it is less than that, but please re-send it. ○President (Issei Aihara) Ms. Misako Hogetsu ◆No.7 (Miko Hogetsu) I did not calculate it. ○Is there any other question? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Issei Aihara) I acknowledge that there is no doubt. We will complete the Q&A of the chairman's report and revision. This will be a discussion, including a revision. There is a notification, so we will allow se tial remarks. First of all, Junhei Yoshida Thank you for your interest. (No.5 Junhei Yoshida) ◆5 (Yoshida Junpei-kun) I will discuss the enactment of the Ordinance to amend part of the Proposal No. 36 Narashino City Tax Ordinance. The first reason for the opposite is that the draft was contrary to the government’s public offering that the amendment of the local tax does not exceed the tax reduction, and in fact it is a large tax reduction. It is the largest real tax increase in the past 10 years, and this is the tax increase. In response to such amendments, the city tax regulations, etc., are certainly tax-free due to the increase of basic deductions, but this tax-free tax is completely less than that of the deduction for 4 years, and it is not enough to compensate the real tax until now. It is also clear to see that even though it has withdrawn the minimum of taxation, it still falls under the standard of life protection and continues the taxation limit system for that. Secondly, the increase in the tax rate of light automobile tax, which is a popular tax, is to increase the various public rates of saki, and also the burden of citizens, and it is un。onable to seek a tax source by strengthening such public tax. In order to correct the unfair tax system in order to secure the tax-reduction source, it is necessary to revise the tax system of large companies and asset owners. In addition, it is natural that the corporate tax rate of large companies with low real burden is raised, but it is necessary to set up the current situation for small and medium enterprises that are difficult to manage under long-term depression. In the case of this city, the number of corporations whose capital is less than 100 million yen is 88.6% of the total number of corporations. For the above reasons, we will reveal the opposite attitude about this decision and end the discussion. Next, the report of the chairperson was not accepted for the request of the government to request an opinion on the establishment of the "Gender Employment Equality Law" which is effective against the労 of the労 Code No. 24. I would like to adopt this petition, and I would like to discuss the論. The government’s 会 opportunities equal bill, as mentioned in the preliminary statement of the application, has been reformed to the labor standard laws, such as overtime labor, holiday labor, civil engineering, and abolishment of physiological leave, has been greatly denied to protect the maternity. Attacks on ma性 protection, such as gender equality, deteriorate the working conditions of the uterus that work on the contrary to realization of true equality, and increase pain. It is far from the philosophy of the most comprehensive and exceptional “Dis。。 of Discri。 in all forms of refugees.” This declaration contrary to the principles of equality of rights and respect for human dignity. It is an obstacle to participate in the political, social and cultural life of your country in the same conditions as men, and also to make it harder to develop the full potential of your country and humanitarian contribution. In , women who work in Japan were 738 million in 738, and in 1982, it was almost 4 by 1,418 million and 2 times. In this situation, it is necessary to establish and enhance this as a gender equality incomparable one. In Japan, the labor conditions of workers are inferior, and the男女 gap between men and women is 52.8 compared to other countries. However, there is no penalty rule that ensures the effectiveness of the male and female opportunities. This is the equality law that pursues only the economic and efficiency of the company. After all, it is not necessary to say that it is an opportunity equal law that is boned in line with the intention of the financial world that aims to increase international competitiveness by low労働者s and long-term labor. The 機会 opportunities equal bill of this time was submitted in with the changing conditions of the labor standard law, and in that sense, it is natural that this petition requires the enactment of effective 平 equality laws while権利 the right to protect the maternity of the labor standard law. I would like to express my sincere app to the request of a job. Next, we will discuss the情 of requesting submission of opinions that are against the port of the ship of Tomahawk, the cruiser of No. 23. The US nuclear submarine Tany for the cruise nuclear power plant “Tomahawk” has entered Yokosuka on this 14th, and Japan has been involved in the execution plan of nuclear wars by the United States, and is trying to turn to a dangerous direction of nuclear war. The Japan Port of Tomahawk, which is the fastest cruiser in Japan, urged that there is a危険 risk of nuclear battles in our country, and in March, we were also asked to submit an opinion to the government and to clearly express the attitude of the opposite port. Also, in January, we called a collaborative fight against Tomahawk for a wide range of organizations and individuals, including social parties, general reviews, and civil organizations, including the Tomahawk Committee and the Tomahuk Committee. In this way, the battle against Tomahawk was formed by an extensive group and individual member of Tomahawk on February 20th. Since then, a variety of activities have been actively deployed in each region. On May 27th, large-scale anti-Tomahawk national unified behavior was spread throughout Japan such as Sasebo, including Yokosuka. In this Yokosuka Assembly, more than 40,000 participants 囲 the base with a chain of anti-tomahawk humans that stretched 8 kilometers, and it became a big concern for grassroots behavior. The Yokosuka Assembly also participated in many Narashino citizens, but the battle against Tomahawk 備bution indicates significant interest and spread among the pre。ural people as seen in such excitement. In the same way as on May 3, the organization named the 100-person committee of Chiba Prefecture who submitted this statement was established with the opposite of Tomahawk distribution. However, in the beginning of this representative, some of the people whose name is called this organization, there are people who have been promoting peace movement and international friendship movement in Japan, such as China and Soviet Union. In the past, these people have divided and confusion into movements and groups in Japan, and this情 has been growing due to the rise of anti-nuclear and tomahawk movements, and these運動s have also been 裂 into movements that wish for peace of the citizens. In addition, there are also people who are screaming at airport crushing in Misatozuka, and through the trout quist population and the aeration, and the behavior of such people should be strictly criticized from the social way, and it is not allowed to help. For the above reasons, the discussion ends by revealing the opposite attitude to the陳. [No.5 Junhei Yoshida altar] ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Next Mr. Shizuko Nogimura. Thank you for your interest. [No.4 Kimura Shizuko-kun] ◆No.4 (Kimura Shizuko) We will continue to discuss the 40th resolution of the proposal, representing the Republic of Japan. Proposal No. 40 is the enactment of the Ordinance to amend part of the Narashino City National Health Insurance Ordinance. For partial amendments to this National Health Insurance Ordinance, tax reduction and low-income burden reduction are favored. However, it is not possible to agree that the maximum amount of insurance premium is 250,000 to 350,000 per household, and the 70,000 yen increase significantly. Limited amount was increased by 20,000 yen. In addition, the government of Mikami City in59 59 years significantly raises public fees such as childcare fees, and the total amount is 34,000 million yen, which is very important for citizens. In addition, it is necessary to return to the citizens of the city to ¥16,482 in the case of a strong health insurance bill that is considered by the National Assembly. This limit is assumed to raise the national health insurance premium, and it is the receiving plate of the insurance premium price. We have a fixed plan, but we only have a limit of 35,000 yen, and we are unable to accept it because we assume the value is raised. 〔4 Kimura Shizuko-kun altar〕 ○The discussion was over the chairperson. Is there any other discussion? No.32 Akihiro Iioka Thank you for your interest. [No.32: Akihiro Iioka] ◆No.32 (Iioka Akihiro) We will participate in the discussion from the standpoint of the appraisal of the Ordinance to amend part of the 40th Narashino National Health Insurance Ordinance. The Committee has made a decision as stated in the current chairperson report. I would like to learn more about the amendment of this Ordinance in each of the members, so I will not explain the summaries, but I would like to try to raise the confusion of the city government that comes from the decision of the proposal. Up to 70,000 yen from 280,000 yen to 350,000 yen is a fact that it is larger than the width of the課. However, this is the fact that the local tax laws have been revised. In addition, in addition to the revised local tax law, when various income deductions and reduction procedures are combined, it is true that the burden of the insurance premium is reduced if it is seen as a whole ins、. I would like to express this with a al value, but I would like to ask everyone of the 8.9% of all ins households of the National Health Insurance member of Narashino City to pay 70,000 yen for the income, but I do not want to miss the fact that the burden of the ins is reduced by 91.1%. More importantly, it’s hard to get up with a low-income income person, but I missed the fact that the low-income is connected to the relief of the low-income, and it’s not just a 70,000 yen, especially a high-income whose value is only 8.9%, so it’s not a good idea. If this protects the lives and lives of citizens, it should not be determined if there is a desire to remedy the low-income persons of the National Health Insurance ins、 persons who are truly 91.1% of Narashino citizens. In addition, if you have revised the city ordinance in、 with the revision of the local tax law of the country, there is no reason for the maintenance program against you. This is why I don’t know the reason for this bill. However, if you do not specify the 10th issue of Article 11, it will be difficult to fix it. In consideration of this side, if the proposal is denied, a debt of 4,809,9 thousand yen will be deficit. In the case of this proposal, it is 16 million yen. As I mentioned earlier, it is that the deficit source can be supplemented with the transfer money. I would like to ask you for the treatment of relief of people with low-income national health insurance of 91.1%. More ○Is there any other discussion? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Issei Aihara) I acknowledge that I have no discussion. This will end the discussion. In addition, please modify the misprint of the proposal No. 2 which is distributed to the original. The word "rugged" of the insurance law is healthy, but we ask you to fix it. I will go to the採. [There are people called "rest", "rest", "meeting progress", etc.] ○How long is the chairperson? 〔15 min〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) 15 minutes. 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) We will rest for 15 minutes. 2:23 p.m. Rest---4343 2:43 p.m. Rest ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Opens a return meeting before a break. The order of the採 will be determined se tially by each committee. [There are people who call "I'm still talking a little, so I'm going to rest for a while now"] ○Chair (Issei Aihara) I will be afraid, but I would like to do this until the 40th issue. Up to 40 〔There is a person called “Yes, it’s important.”〕 ○Chairman (Issei Aihara) First, we will grant the proposal No. 36 issued by the General Affairs Standing Committee. The chairperson's report is approved. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Therefore, the Proposal No. 36 was approved. Next, we will issue No. 37 of the proposal. The chairperson's report on the proposal is a decision. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Issei Aihara) is all standing. Therefore, the Proposal No. 37 was accepted as the original proposal. Next, we will issue No. 23 of the request. The report of the chairperson is not accepted. We will ask for the start of all of you who agree to adopt the情. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Therefore, I decided that the application No. 23 is not accepted. Next, we will make a request No. 24. The report of the chairperson is not accepted. We will ask for the 立 of you who agrees to adopt this request. Please wait. 〔What is your request?” ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No. 24 [There is a person who speaks me] ○Chairman (Issei Aihara), but since now, the members of the Board have entered, I do not know the number again. We will ask for the 立 of you who agrees to adopt this request. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Therefore, I decided that the application No. 24 is not accepted. Next, we have decided to issue No.22 of the contract which was attached to the construction permanent committee. The chairperson's report on this情 is to be accepted. We will ask for the 立 of you who agrees to resolve this request as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Therefore, we decided to send the application number 22. Next, we will issue No. 38 of the proposals attached to the Civil Welfare Standing Committee. The chairperson's report on the proposal is a good-time job. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Issei Aihara) is all standing. Therefore, the Proposal No. 38 was decided to be appropriate. Next, we will decide the Proposal No. 39. The chairperson's report on the proposal is a good-time job. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Issei Aihara) is all standing. Therefore, the Proposal No. 39 was decided to be the appropriate. It is good. It’s nice that Mr. Ozawa came in. It is good. [There is a person called "Please rest"] ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Next, we will decide the 40th bill. 〔Request for a break」「Break」「Vocation progress」「Chair〕 I have been taking a break, but I would like to explain the situation of the rest. You don’t need to take a break. Let’s talk about it later. Please rest. "There is a person called etc."

○Chair (Issei Aihara) 〔Please ask for a break.〕 The chairman said. There is a person who calls "It was a break after that though I do until the front of No. 40". ○Chair (Issei Aihara) No, I do not say. 〔I was a kind of opinion, but I’m also...〕 ○The chairperson (Issei Aihara) I said that I will do until No. 40. 〔It was to the front of you, and there is a person called a break in a little》 ○How many minutes is the chairperson? I'm re。ing. 〔It’s good for 5 minutes〕 ○President Issei Aihara? 5 minutes 2:50 p.m. Rest------52 p.m. 2:52 p.m. Rest ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Opens a return meeting before a break. Proposal No. 40 will be issued. First of all, we will make a decision on the amendments submitted by Mr. Miyoko Hozuki for the proposal No. 40. We will ask for the start of all of you in favor of this revision. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Therefore, the revision was rejected. Next, we will make a decision based on the original plan. The Proposal No. 40 will ask for the prosperity of you to decide according to the original plan. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Therefore, the Proposal No. 40 was decided. --- --- --- △About Proposal No.2 and Proposal No.3 (Proposal: Explanation of Reason) ○President (Issei Aihara) The agenda of the 3rd, 2nd and 3rd of the proposal will be given. We will ask the applicant to explain the reason for the proposal. 。 Thank you for your interest. 〔No.6 Nobuo-kun Baba〕 ◆We will propose the proposal of No. 6 (Baba Shinzoku). Proposal No. 2 is an opinion statement that is against the “Act to amend part of the Health Insurance Act” This is submitted by the provisions of Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Rules. The presenter is Shinzo Baba. The appraisal will be abbreviated. Mr. Junpei Yoshida, Mr. Shizuko Kimura, Mr. Teruo Shikaku, Mr. Tetsuro Saito, Mr. Sato Tobari, Mr. Kazuo Miyauchi, Mr. Naoyoshi Iwa, and Masashi Suzuki. This was revealed at the 18th Annual Meeting, but it is intended to object to some amendments to the Health Insurance Act, etc. that must be very burdensome to protect the lives and health of the people. The “Act to amend part of the Health Insurance Act, etc.” submitted by the government to the present会 is to radically alter and retire medical security, which is an important pillar of our social security system. In particular, the reduction of the individual’s benefits, the reduction of the self-payment limit of medical expenses, and the reduction of the insurance benefits referred to as the “医療 standard” are the機会 of the national burden, and the opportunity to receive medical care is taken. In addition, the re、ement medical system with no burden on the nation’s neighbourhood, and the reduction of the unilateral auxiliary rate to the municipal government’s neighbourhood are directly linked to the increase of insurance premiums. Therefore, we strongly request the withdrawal of the bill. The above shall be submitted in with the provisions of Article 99-2 of the Local Autonomous Law. Life and health problems. Thank you for your understanding. , the Proposal No. 3 is intended to submit an opinion statement that is against the党position, thought, and the freedom of association, in。 with the provisions of Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Rules. The presenter is Shinzo Baba. The appraisal will be abbreviated. Mr. Junhei Yoshida, Mr. Shizuko Kimura, Mr. Tetsuro Saito, Mr. Sato Tobari, Mr. Kazuo Miyauchi, and Mr. Naoyoshi Iwa. Prime Minister Nakasone, on February 7, 1959, instructed the public party to examine the political party law, and the private party proposed its establishment to the Council for Poli。 Ethics on February 23. According to the “Yoshimura Proposal,” the government’s policy is to eliminate minority parties, and to control political activities, such as the number of people in the country, the number of votes, and the number of people in the party. This is the opposite of the history of social progress. Before the war, all political parties, groups and individuals who claim to be critical to the Emperor’s government, all political parties, government officials and socialism were resilient and eliminated. After the war, the sanctuary was destroyed as a contrary to the fundamental principles of democracy, and the present const、tion was established. The politician law is the principle of this const tion and cannot be tolerated as an invasion of fundamental human rights, freedom of belief and freedom of association. Therefore, governments and political associations are strongly demanded not to be subject to any consultation or enactment of the Party Law. We will submit an opinion form according to the provisions of Article 99. This is a problem that is based on democracy. It is very unfortunate that there is a report that is not sufficiently understood by the public about this government law. Therefore, I would like to introduce one詩, which is very easy to understand, what will happen if this government law goes through. This is theドイツの of this one, the famous German singer, Mulhan Neemler, who opposed the war in the Nach period. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. “When Nachi attacked the communist, he was somewhat anxious. However, after all, I was not a communist. Then Nachi attacked socialists. I was worried about myself. However, I was not a socialist. I didn’t do anything. After that, the school had a newspaper, the Jews, and the hands of the attack were added one after another, and my anxiety increased each time, but I still did not do anything. Then Nachi attacked the church. And I was just a church. Then I did what I did. However, it was already too late. We would like to express our sincere app to you in order to become a society like this. 〔No.6 Nobuo-kun altar〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) I will enter the question more than this. Do you have any questions? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Issei Aihara) I acknowledge that there is no doubt. Q&A Thank you for your understanding. I would like to omit the Commission’s deposit in。 with the provisions of Article 37, Paragraph 2 of the Convention Rules. Is there any objection to this? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Issei Aihara) I acknowledge that it is no objection. Therefore, we decided to omit the deposit of the committee for the proposal No. 2 and proposal No. 3. More discussions. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. No discussions? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Issei Aihara) I acknowledge that I have no discussion. This will end the discussion. I will go to the採. First, we will decide the second issue of the proposal. This plan requires you to decide according to the original plan. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Therefore, the Proposal No. 2 was determined. Next, we will decide the Proposal No.3. This plan requires you to decide according to the original plan. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Issei Aihara) Therefore, the Proposal No.3 was denied. All proceedings made to the parliament have been closed. --- --- --- △ ○Chair (Issei Aihara) In this case, there is a offer that you want toつ from you, so forgive it. Thank you for your interest. 〔 Shinichi Mikami’s Speaker〕 ◎ I would like to express my thanks to the closing of the June parliament. Thank you very much for your understanding. As a result, we consider it as a well-executive department, and we are renewing our deter to be born in the future administrative operation. In the general question of the council, 8 people asked questions about the development of Tanizu Amusement Park. In the future, we would like to express our deepest with the Houses and Urban Development Corporations, and we would like to ask for guidance in various ways. We would like to thank you again for your continued support and cooperation. Thank you very much. 〔 Shinichi Mikami altar〕------ Close ○Chair (Issei Aihara) We will close the second regular meeting of the Narashino City Council in 1984. Thank you for your understanding. 3:5 p.m. Closing, signed by the provisions of Article 123, Paragraph 2 of the Local Autonomous Law.