chiholog - 地方議会議事録横断検索

78 79 79 ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) Open today's meeting. We have 31 attendees. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. First of all, we will report the late notification. I would like to thank you for your understanding. Now, we will go to the schedule. --- --- --- △No of the meeting signing member ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Nominates the meeting directors in the first day. In with the provisions of Article 118 of the Conference Rules, the Committee shall nominate Kiyoichi Takino and Sato Tobari, the Chair. 〔Chairs and Call for Proposals〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) I asked the general questions and asked the chairs to request material, but the answer was reached to me on October 3rd. "Nanashino City Council Chairman Kiyoshi Kawamoto's Kanashino viewer Takayoshi Yoshino's request for the materials 3rd Regular Meeting in 56. In general questions, I議員 Aihara's request for the material, I would like to report the answer. "In such a case, the meeting is already one day today, but in general questions, it is the one that acquires a substitute place for public use, and it is a response from a financial institution. Nevertheless, I remember that there is no reason why I can’t submit a piece of paper, or the Representative Director of Narashino City Remodeling Co., Ltd. is Takashi Yoshino. Therefore, I would like to ask the parliament to discuss my request. I would like to advise you to make a decision again. More [There are people who call "approval"] ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) I will rest for a while. 2:00 p.m. Break------37 3:00 p.m. Break ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Continue to open the meeting before resting. [Chairperson] ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) I would like to ask for a message, and I will submit an emergency action here. In this regular meeting, I request that the reconstruction of the city which I requested was acquired as a substitute for public use, and the request for submission of materials related to about 18 brushes that were shouldered to the development public. [There are people who call "approval"] ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Just now, the Aihara Board member wanted to make a resolution to request the authorities to submit about 18 brushes that were shouldered by the public to develop land acquired as a substitute for public use. There was a predetermined appraisal, and the motion was established. Thank you for your understanding. We will ask for the start of each of you who agrees to make a decision as the main act. 〔Priorship〕 ○All the Chairs (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) are established. Therefore, this movement was decided. We will ask the authorities to promptly submit the materials that have just been submitted. --- --- --- △ Proposal No. 60, No. 71, No. 79, No.84, No. 45, No. 47, No. 45, No. 47, No. 47, No. 71, No. 71, No. 79, No. 79, No.84, No.45, No. 45, No. 47, No. 47, No. 45, No. 45, No. 47, No. 47, No. 71, No. 71, No. 71, No. 71, No. 71, No. 71, No. ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) The agenda of the date No. 2, the agenda No. 60, the agenda No. 71, the agenda No. 79, the agenda No.84, and the petition No. 45, the agenda No. 47. ---昭和56 September 30, 56 Chairman of Narashino City Council Mr. Yoshiyoshi Kawamoto General Affairs Standing Chair Akizo Yamanoi Committee Review Report The incident attached to this committee was determined as follows. Regarding the establishment of a part of the Ordinance to amend a part of the Ordinance on the Public Damage Compensation, etc. of a part of the Ordinance to amend a part of the Ordinance of the No. 61 Narashino City Special Accounting Ordinance, the Ordinance to amend a part of the Ordinance of the Ordinance of the Ordinance of the Ordinance of the Ordinance of the Ordinance of the Part-time Staff, etc. Copyright (C) 岡KEI KAISHA All Rights Reserved. Revised the enactment of the Ordinance on the installation and management of the Kaihin Reen Garden and Saginuma Reido, Narashino City, No. 63, as a result of the number review (As of the draft amendment) A large number of agreements (Appendix) Proposal No. 63 The establishment of a Ordinance on the establishment of the Narashino Seaside Relics Garden and Saginuma Relics shall be submitted to the above draft according to Article 67 of the Conference Rules. Submitted on September 30, 56 Chairman of the Civil and Welfare Standing Committee, Akihiro Iioka, Amendment to the Proposal No. 63, Amendment to Article 3, Paragraph 2 (2) Saiba. Delete "or place" in paragraph 1 of Article 6. In Article 1 of Annex, "However, the part related to the grounds of the rule of the New Ordinance shall be enforced from the date specified by the rule. Remove the part of ". The first type A "606,000 yen" is changed to "261,000 yen", and the first type B472,000 yen is removed. "Remarks The category of the first type A and B is publicized every time the users of the base. delete Appendix 2 (19 19 Paragraph 1) Change "5,000 yen" to "3,000 yen" during seaside 園en management fee and "10,000 yen" to "6,000 yen". Reasons for submitting: In order to respond to the needs of citizens and make it more inexpensive, it shall be 。ing the Saijo and Outer Rails, etc., and the base site, which is the property of all citizens shared, shall be amended to be effective for many citizens. ---昭和56 September 30, 56 Chairman of Narashino City Council Mr. Yoshiyoshi Kawamoto, Chairman of the教y Committee Review Report The incident attached to the Committee was determined as follows. Copyright (C) Akitsu General Sports Park All Rights Reserved. 5656 October 1, 56--- Keiichi Kawamoto Special Accounting Budget Special Committee Chairman Shigeo Kawasaki Committee Review Report The case of委員会ling to the Committee is determined as follows. Appraisal No. 82 Showa 56 year Narashino city planning soil district drawing arrangement business special accounting budget (No. 1) All approved proposal No. 83 Showa 56 year Narashino city public会計age business special accounting correction budget (No. 1) All approved proposal No.84 Showa 56 year Narashino city spiritual garden and spiritual hall business special accounting budget correction (As of the revised draft paper) A large number of agreements (Appendix) Proposal No.84 The amendments to the above proposals shall be submitted in。 with the provisions of Article 67 of the Conference Rules as separately submitted. Submitted on October 1, 56 Special Accounting Budget Special Chair Shigeo Kawasaki Special Accounting Budget Special Committee Akihiro Iioka Amendment to Proposal No.84 No.2,000 No.3,756,000,000 Yen to 2,000,000,000 Yen. The reason for submission is that the underlying action of the proposal has a deep relationship with the proposal No. 63. Therefore, the decision of the civil welfare permanent committee is a large reduction of the base usage fee. Therefore, we respect it and modify it. --- --- --- ○The chairperson (Keisuke Kawamoto) requests the report of the chairperson. First of all, Mr. Akizo Uyamanoi, the chairperson of the general、. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman Akizo Yamanoi Speakers〕 ◆I would like to report the progress of the examination and the results of the proposals and requests submitted to the General Affairs and Service Committee. First of all, the draft is to amend a part of the city ordinance, with partial amendments to the local government’s compensation law in December last year, with the amendment of the local government’s compensation law, and the main part of the proposal is to amend the 族 of the occupancy compensation and the amendment of the arithmetic method, the suspension of compensation 。, and the temporary payment system for compensation 。. In the process of judging, there is a question about the meaning of the term, the date of enforcement, the method of determining the basic amount of compensation, etc., and it is a revision of the legal terms to change the disease to "disposal". The amendment of the payment amount and arithmetic method is to use the same rate as the worker disaster compensation law, and try to raise about 7% compared to the current amount. It is 153 days to understand how many factors on the basis of compensation are. In addition, the payment rate of the differential amount was mutatis mutandis to the provisions of the労働 Standards Act, and the effective date was revised from November 1, 55. As a result of the vote, we decided that we should be able to make it as originally proposed. Next, we would like to inform you about the establishment of an ordinance that amends part of the proposal No. 61 Narashino City Special Accounting Ordinance. This plan is intended to establish and operate a special accounting with accounting and management expenses related to the construction and maintenance of the newly installed seaside relics and the Saginuma Relics. We decided that this plan should be accepted as originally proposed by all of us. Next, we would like to announce the establishment of an Ordinance to amend part of the Ordinance on the provision of the Agenda No. 62 Narashino City Disaster Condolence Comfort and the lending of disaster relief funds. This plan is intended to amend a part of the city ordinance as part of the amendment to the provisions of the Act No. 22 disaster condolence condolences and the loans of disaster relief funds and the amendment of the Enforcement Decree. This content is to raise the amount of condolence condolences, raise the loan limit of the disaster relief funds, and add a new reading rule when the residual part must be broken. In the process of judging, there is a question that the amount of payment, etc., such as the whole country, or what case there was in the past, and the amount of the law is the national standard. In the past, one of Kamogawa City in the 22nd 風hoon of October 54, one of the富士山 s of Mt. Fuji in August 55, and two reasons are applied, but there was no application in this city. In addition, these are applied (application principle) based on the application, but as an official authority, the application is when a disaster relief is held, so there is a response that I would like to guide to the extent of course, and I decided that all the results of the decision should be determined as the original. Next, the acquisition of property of Proposal No. 79 (35-meter fire pump car) and Proposal No. 80 (relief car) is about (relief car). In order to enhance and strengthen the fire fighting system in the future, it is the conclusion of a contract for the purchase of a rescue vehicle to deal with traffic accidents and complex ified disasters. In the process of judging, there was an active question from each member, and there was a response from the authorities. If you would like to express the main thing, the price will be designed according to the actual situation in the pipe at the fire department or the fire department in each municipality, so there is no unified price. However, this is the minimum equipment required, although the number of 30-meter class is 5.8 million yen. Since the ideal angle of the ごder vehicle is 75 degrees, the road width staff needs 6 meters and weighs 19 tonnes, so we will take care of the guidance according to the application for construction confirmation so that we can withstand parking when we work. In addition, the 32-metre class was one time for the 35-metre class, but it was not reached to the rooftop of the building, and the 35-metre class was adopted to respond to these requirements. The main thing of the accessories included a TV device to enable safe fire extingui activities at night, without having to worry about it. In addition, the rescue vehicle is equipped with a光ulator, a powerful amplifier wireless microphone, a winch, an oxygen-generating re。ratory device, and the delivery date is March 57, and the rescue vehicle is scheduled to be December this year, and it is one year. The location was established in April of this year. However, we trained in the current post-delivery vehicle. As a result of this proposal, we decided that it should be determined by the app。。 of everyone. Next, I would like to express my request for the資産 land fixed asset tax No. 45. This request is based on the taxable amount of the general farmland, and the content of the request is that the farmland that is currently intended for agriculture is not taxed in the same way as the land. As a result of the decision, we decided to send the proposal with the app of everyone. Next, I would like to express my request for the survival of the Akebono Amusement Park, 4-chome Motoda, No. 46. This petition is intended to strongly request continued use for the repayment of the municipalities of the local government that have been allowed to temporarily use the local community. In the process of judging, I asked the authorities to explain this matter, and I explained that there was a lap with the local several times in the past, but it was unresolved. According to the explanation of the authorities, the installation of fixed items is subject to removal at any time until the completion of the construction work of the団acent complex, and the cancellation is subject to the original form at the time of return at the burden of the local town council, etc., and it is a free rental contract for 1 year, and the condition for 55 years is promised to 。 this year. The committee decided that it should be resolved as an authority before the request was made, not to think about the city and the request of the parliament, but to acknowledge the wishes, it should be made a lot of effort. We will close the report of the General Affairs Standing Committee. 〔Chairman Yamanoi Akizo altar〕 ○Chairman (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, Mr. Yoshiki Mineo, Senior Chairman of Construction. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of Construction Executive Committee Yoshiki Mineo’s Speaker〕 ◆The Chairperson of the Construction Standing Committee (Kikiku Mineo) will report the progress and results of the examination for three proposals and one request for the Construction Standing Committee at the Regular Meeting. After hearing the reason for proposals from the authorities, we carried out local measures related to proposals and requests, and conducted Q&A, discussion, and adoption. First of all, we would like to announce the establishment of the Ordinance on the prevention of bicycles left in Narashino City, Vol. 64. In this case, a decline in the social awareness of many users is a phenomenon of leaving in the vicinity of each station, etc., which has been widely used in commuting, commuting, shopping, etc. from the convenience of bicycles recently. This article is based on the basic skeleton of three points. It is intended to be implemented from April 1, 57 based on the clarification of the duties of the office that produces a large amount of parking demand for bicycles such as supermarkets, department stores, and playgrounds. We would like to express the main question and answers in the process of this proposal review. First, we will specify the route around each station as the first step. In addition, if the cooperation of citizens will be obtained in the future, we would like to consider the future specification of the base of the predecessor city. In addition, I would like to consult with the Security and Traffic Safety Council and make a response. In the area designated this time, there was a response that the idea of installing paid bicycle parking and free bicycle parking. Next, we considered a half-day basis, from morning to day, from day to evening, from evening to the next morning, for measures to leave bicycles in the area. If this goes beyond, we moved to a nearby location, and then moved to a storage location after a week. In addition, for the work of installing bicycle parking lots for supermarkets and other installers, we would like to treat bicycle parking lots in a開発si-compulsory manner while tie-up with development guidelines etc. In addition, since the current state, the Ministry of Construction does not indicate the standards for each facility for existing supermarkets and business sites, etc., there was a response to the purpose of the establishment of the Ordinance, guidance and PR of the bicycle to park in the parking lot. Next, there was a response to the railway operators, etc., that we would like to cooperate with the borrowing method as a bicycle parking place. In addition, the surcharge for the bicycle parking lot is 1/3 of the surcharge and 1/3 of the surcharge. In addition, there is a system that the grant from the Japan Bicycle Promotion Association is transferred from the 6th year to the city by constructing a facility and giving a free registration for 5 years. The city had a response to the question of this grant in cooperation with Funabashi City on the north exit of Tsudanuma Station. In addition, the use of bicycle parking lot adopts the registration system, and the use of the bicycle is made by putting a sticker on it. In addition, I would like to organize two people in the parking lot around each station. There was a response to the unregistered person to carry out instructions for registration and guidance for free parking nearby. Next, the collection of storage fees for un置 bicycles is prescribed by the user's registration fee in this article. However, there was a large amount of un置 status, and if the financial burden is applied to the administration, at that time, I would like to consider the Yao city scheme of Osaka. In order to reduce the registration fee, there was a full or partial reduction to a person who has a life supporter, a person with a physical disability certificate, a 爆ic bomb victim, and a child’s family based on the mother and child welfare law. In addition to the above, there were suspicions and documentation on the scale and concept of the bicycle parking lot around each station, the number of leftovers in the city, and the number of outsiders in the city. After the Q&A, there was no discussion on the proposal, and the results of the decision were decided to be accepted by all the parties. Next, we would like to inform you about the signing of the contract for the Proposal No. 66 (tentative name) the new construction work (construction construction) of the Kasumi municipal housing (Building No. 2). This plan is intended to conclude a contract with Asanuma Co., Ltd. in order to construct a new building of 40 houses (tentative name) of Kasumi City Residential Building No.2. First of all, we would like to inform you about the use of the contract amount and the initial budget for this construction, the total cost of the new construction cost of the municipal housing was JPY 340,0967,000. Next, the difference between the first building and the second building is that there is a housing complex that is located on the west side of the place to be built this time, and there is a city house built last year, so we adopted measures against noise and vibration. In addition, for the status of application for tenants in the first building, the competition rate was 1.96 times, and for the recr。ing of the old-fashioned households, there were 10 applications for the recr。ing of six units. For the future purchase plan of the site, the total area of 22,530 square meters, the 55-year purchase is 3 thousand square meters, and 4 thousand square meters as a 56-year budget, and the rest was a response that I would like to buy in57 57 years after財政ion with finance. In the discussion, the city plans to construct six and 240 units by60 60 years in the Kasumi area, but it was 1.9 times the status of tenants in the first building constructed in 55 years, and the current status of tenants' income is severe, and the opinion that this proposal is praised with questions about the need to construct 240 units in this area. After the conclusion of the discussion, we decided that all of the採s should be accepted. Next, we would like to inform you about the conclusion of the contract for the Proposal No. 71 (Tsudanuma Sewage Conta。 Line Sewage Construction (Second Phase 2nd Wrap). This plan is currently under construction of the first cover work for the second phase of Tsudanuma Sewage Contaminated Line Sewage Construction. It is 838 meters extension from the cross section of Kikuda River to 50 places. This proposal was agreed with the explanation of the authorities, and all of the案s shall be approved. Finally, I would like to express my request. I would like to express my request for the counter s of the land of the real paddy elementary school No. 47. In order to protect the safety of residents in the east side of the east side of the MAI Primary School, the establishment of a retained wall in the east side of the east side, etc. In the process of judging, we 弁 the authorities about the protection measures of cramps, but the area has been designated as a natural conservation area, and since it is used in elementary school, it is a natural observation path, and it is useful for learning. On the other hand, the committee gave a comment on whether there is a need for 3 meters, and considering the relationship with the natural landscape. In the discussion, we wanted to ensure the safety of the affiliated people with consideration of measures to protect the natural environment and the landscape from the standpoint of appraising, and the wish is reasonable. Ends the report of the construction permanent committee. 〔Chairman of Construction : Yoshiki Mineo altar〕

○Chairman (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, Chairman of the Minshuku Welfare Regular Chair, Akihiro Iioka. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman of Minshuku Welfare Permanent Chair Akihiro Iioka Speakers〕 ◆Chairman of Minshuku Social Welfare (Iioka Akihiro) Instructed by the chairperson, I would like to report the passage and the results of the examination regarding the establishment of the Minshuku Remnant Committee of the Minshuku Remnant Committee. This proposal is proposed at the 2nd Regular Meeting of Saki, and a partial amendment to the deter、 is made and repro。. In the first explanation of the proposed reason, after the closing of the June parliament, we explained the details about the contents of the opinion hearing from each member of the parliament in the form of assistant and orientation. I would like to express the following: First of all, there was a saying that the parliament is annoying and counter、ing the cemetery construction that is currently underway based on the contract with Development Corporation and Takenaka Chemical Industry, but I think that it should be stopped immediately after the deter。 of the parliament. Currently, the business content of Takenaka Chemical Industry is under the preload to安定 the ground sediment by applying soil pressure over 1.2 meters and圧bilizing the ground sediment. If this method is disco。ed, it will return to zero. Is it possible to stop this? In addition, we have received a response that we are in a position to respect the opinions of such parliamentary muscles as a public company. Next, there is a feeling that the amount stated in the bill is far away from the other city. The cemetery of the city is cheaper than the cemetery of the temples in the city, but the authorities asked the question of how to view it, as a method for the previous proposal, it was necessary to freely select the cemetery, so this time, we reduced the usage fee. These proposals were never expensive, which were revised and suggested for common facilities such as Saiba, Toya, and Parking Lot. This project is based on the principle of the beneficiary burden that divides the total business expenses by the number of compartments, so the answer was made that I would like to understand. On the other hand, the idea of being able to be a supple thing is that the members ask for the beneficiary burden on the saiba. In addition, the cemetery who wishes to cemetery buys the cemetery and does not intend to buy the cemetery. In addition, I think that it should be taken separately from the citizens who need it by 、ing the outer part of the cemetery usage fee, but the question of how to view it, the authorities will work independently by the applicants of the cemetery, and it will be a problem that the use area of 4.5 square meters per district is slightly narrow. There was a response to whether this is a matter of concern whether it matches the efficiency of free selection. If it is a cemetery for citizens, the cemetery setting of this 2,062 unprecedented compartment was based on such opinions, but the committee members do not know whether the cemetery needs to be in the past 10 years. Therefore, the first term will be delivered from the end of July, 57, and the second term will be delivered from the end of August, 57. Therefore, even if a person wishing to be outdated among the applicants for the first period, there was a response that this problem will be solved at the end of November 57. In the case of this city, this is a 園en and a saiba, and the reason why it was proposed by the city is legal or funeral. However, as a real problem, the citizens go there and do funeral is quite far from citizen、s. The statue of the Saiba is fully equipped with elevators, automatic doors, reception rooms, machine rooms, air conditioning, and others, and there is a question whether such a Saiba is really necessary in the current state or development of the city of Narashino. So, for the question of the reason, the authorities have not borrowed a meeting place in the city when the residents of Tanitsu Heights once had funeral, and the case of borrowing the Kawatetsu assembly facility in Chiba, there are four or five cases in the past 15 years. Currently, I felt the need as a problem that can occur in the housing complex, Kasumi Complex and Akitsu Complex. The requirements of elevators and other facilities must be considered as an elevator, a handicapped toilet, and a slope in the highest priority of welfare regardless of what kind of facility in the public facility standards of Narashino City. Even if the number of air conditioners is a small number of cases, it was a response that I had to take a consistent facility in such a way that it is equipped with air conditioning as a measure against the remains. In response to this, the committee suspected that there are more ways to treat such a thing without making such a thing, but the government decided to make a calculation of the number of the annual use of the assembly office by the authorities on the question of how much the number of the citizens are assumed to use this place. And there was a response that the number of kai。ers per case was put out and the size of the saiba was determined. In addition, the first type 5,000 yen and the second type 10,000 yen for the seaside relic garden management fee will differ from the previous proposal, but the question that this amount should only be lowered due to the fact that it was set out as part of this time, the authorities gave the answer that there is no relationship with the outside. In the closing stages of the cemetery usage fee, which was set forth in the table 1 of the bill and the basis for theの建築umulation, there was no suspicion of the cemetery usage fee, but the cemetery usage fee of the cemetery per compartment was calculated by the authorities, but the cemetery of the cemetery was calculated by the cemetery of the cemetery when it was removed. The examination for the proposal was conducted for two days, with a request for submission of reference materials for several points. In addition to the above-mentioned matters, each member has a total of 20 years of administration fee for the draft of Article 5 of the Ordinance stipulated in the qualification of the user, the problem of the cemetery and the depth of the cemetery, and the size of the cemetery related to the cemetery, the number of compartments that are not attached to the outside is 2,062. The following revisions were submitted from one member to complete the Q&A. In order to make the cemetery more affordable, the cemetery is intended to be effective for many citizens. The contents of the cemetery are "(2) saiba" in Article 3, Article 6, Article 11, "or saiba" in Article 1 of Article 1 of Article 1 of Annex, and "Remove the cemetery fee" in Chapter 1 of Annex 1, "Remove the cemetery fee" for the first class A "606,000 yen" in the first class of the cemetery. Therefore, after requesting the explanation of the amendment from the move submitter, a question was made from the committee. In the case of such modifications, the citizens were very troublesome or questioned how to apply for the citizens who already have 3 thousand people in reality. After the Q&A session was concluded and the discussion was made, there were opinions from the following committee members: First of all, it is more obvious than to see the fire that the citizen can buy something higher than the original draft for the revision. It is not a problem that should be cut lightly if the people who bought the cemetery think about how to benefit this. For example, if the cemetery is rained suddenly, it is convenient if there is a place. Therefore, I think that it is not a 場 service to those who bought the cemetery to develop a saiba that can be used for a fully-設備ipped multi-purpose, half-minute equipment. Therefore, it is completely opposite to the modifications to cut the place and the outside. From another member, the contents of the amendment were expressed in the posture of the local government to provide the citizens with a cheaper 園yard. Through the Saki’s June regular meeting and this regular meeting, the public cemetery has seven cities in Chiba, Funabashi, and Ichikawa. The citizens believe that they want the same or close price as these 園yards, so the amendment is congratulations from the heart. In the future, it should be designed to allow the cemetery to rest for the construction of a worker-filled house, etc., because the cemetery is cut, it should take at least 6 scales for the cemetery of 4.5 square meters per compartment. In addition, it is advisable to sell valuable assets of citizens to other citizens about the provisions of written regulations concerning the qualifications of the user of Article 5 in the proposal, so the operation of this rule will be penetrated by the principle of citizen priority. It is regret that the passage of time to today about the construction of the cemetery from another member. In order to avoid confusion, the applicants who have already applied for the first term shall take sufficient care in the authorities, and to be able to rest the cemetery within the management office, to conduct surveys on the scale of the cemetery for citizens including those who wish to purchase the first period, and to ask for sufficient care for low income. In addition, another member agrees to the revision and adds the following opinions: In other words, the first cemetery applicant gave the opportunity to freely select the outside of the cemetery, reflecting the citizen’s voices in the construction of the cemetery, to voluntarily conduct the civil cemetery business, and for the cemetery, each statement was made to wish to advance the construction in the future. After such a course, we decided to make a correction, and then, as a result of the completion of each draft, we decided to make a correction as follows. We will report the examination of the civil welfare permanent committee. 〔Chairman of the Civil Welfare Regular Chair Akihiro Iioka altar〕 ○Chairman (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, Ms. Abe, the s、ptor, Mr. Abe. Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman Abe Mikuni Speaker〕 ◆Mr. Abe will report the教y Committee by the chairperson. We would like to inform you about the progress and results of the examination of the proposal No.65, the proposal No.67, and the proposal No.70. First of all, I would like to ask for consent for the appointment of a committee member of the Proposal No. 65. This proposal is for Mr. Kanichi Akiyama, who is currently a member of the Board of Education, to be the expiration of his term on October 5. There was a description of the history, etc. from the authorities, and the committee members were advised by the Board of Education to appoint this time, and asked whether the opinions of the Const。tion and Basic Education Act were heard. Next, I would like to inform you about the signing of the contract for the Proposal No. 67 (The 7th Junior High School Gymnasium New Construction (Building Construction)). This plan is intended to enter into a contract agreement for the construction of a gymnasium to the Seventh Junior High School. In the process of reviewing the proposal, the committee questioned the reason why the design company was selected for the proposal, and the authorities decided based on the technical contents and results. In addition, a committee member questioned the structure of the building, counter、s against ground deposition and how to conduct the construction progress inspection, but we agreed with the answer of the authorities. In addition, a committee member requested that the flooring of the Kendo site should be sufficiently safe, and all of them decided to be approved in favor of this decision. Next, I would like to inform you about the conclusion of the contract of the proposal No. 68 construction contract (tentative name). This plan is intended to enter into a contract contract for the construction of Tanizu Public Hall as the 6th public hall in the city. In the process of the draft review, the committee members discussed how the residents interacted with the construction of the public hall, and the noise of the Keiyo road is not interfering with. The authorities discussed and asked the request four times with the residents. There was a response that the noise counter is sufficiently considered in the design. In addition, there was a question about the use of the athletic plaza and the scale of the library, but I accepted it by the authorities. In addition, a committee member requested that he/。 operate in consideration of the safety of children and old people who use the plaza of exercise, and decided that all of them should be accepted in favor of this decision. Next, I would like to inform you about the conclusion of the contract for construction contract No. 69 (tentative name)コミュニティー Community Center new construction (construction construction). This plan is intended to enter into a contract agreement to construct the Eastern Community Center in Higashi-Narashino. In the process of reviewing the proposal, the committee members first questioned the discussion with the locals, how to manage and operate the community center, and the future concept. Three local consultations were made by the authorities. The city is responsible for the maintenance and management of libraries and buildings, but I would like to discuss with the locals for the operation of other facilities. In the future, we plan to have a community center of 5 buildings. In addition, there was a question about the safety, noise prevention, and the structure of the library during construction, but we agreed with the answers of the authorities and decided that all of the members should be approved as a result of this proposal. Next, we would like to inform you about the signing of the contract for the Proposal No. 70 (tentative name) Akitsu General Sports Park soccer stadium new construction (building construction). This plan is intended to enter into a new soccer field in Akitsu Sports Park and to enter into a contract contract contract for the construction of an施設 facility. I would like to express the main questionnaire in the process of the examination, and the committee gave a question of why baseball field construction was later, why it could not be constructed as a general ground, and why it took the seat to the south. On the other hand, the authorities gave priority because there is no soccer field in the city. There was a way to think about the general ground, but it is impossible in the area. There was a response to the observation seat that took into account the buffer zone and was on the south side. After Q&A, we decided that all of our proposals should be accepted in favor. Ends the report of the教y Committee. 〔Chairman Abe Michikun altar〕 ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) The meeting time of today will be extended in advance due to the circumstances of the meeting. Next, the general accounting budget special chairperson Masashi Akiyama. Thank you for your interest. [Presen by Masashi Akiyama, Special Chair of General Accounting Budget] ◆Report of the general accounting budget special committee by the chairman's instructions. I would like to report the progress and results of the examination for the proposal No. 81, which was attached to the general accounting budget special committee. The content of the correction is to add ¥16,473,42,21,000 for the year-end and new budget, and to change, abolish and add the total budget to ¥4,170,88,000. After the review, the corrections were explained by the se tial authorities, and the details were suspicious. The main thing is that the addition of 8,823,21,000 yen for the開発。s in the 、 is the development burden based on the development guidelines, but the members say that the collection of this burden is not compulsory, while asking for cooperation.労働 fee5 15,000 yen For the construction of the labor center, the total amount of 27 projects is paid to companies, corporate organizations, and labor organizations. As a result, there are 82労働s as of July 23, 2017, and the development burden of the citizens is undoubtedly expressed as a labor bond that is trying to budget 9,760 million. This correction amount is 3,684.46m2 of 11 brushes, according to the questionnaire, the overall plan is 11,723m2 in total of 32 brushes. On this, the committee said that there is a planned road, and there is no rework. However, the city and the Board of Education questioned how to do this, and the relationship of tax special rehabilitation law applied to the educator's decision and the land marketer to acquire the land. Local bonds and obligations As of the end of this year, the cumulative amount of local bonds was JPY 1.52,161,44,000, and the cumulative ratio was 13.9%. According to the answer to question, the design supervision for this construction is already made by Tomiya Construction Office, but the committee members construct this as a public facility and enact the regulations, but what do we think about receiving。s? Do we want to use this facility for a variety of purposes? When it was finished, it was suspicious about how to think about how to make effective use of the time zone in conjunction with the public hall of the Board of Education. In that case, if the compensation budget for this予算 is determined, the hall can be constructed, so the government has questioned how to request a。, but at this time I would like to ask for a response that does not work. In the event of a question on how to handle bicycles left around the station on the newly established bicycle counter costs, the authorities first put a warning card on the bicycles left for one month, and if there were bicycles that were left for two weeks after that, the city would remove it. In addition, there was a response that the bicycle parking lot such as Tanizu, rice paddy, etc., which was budgeted for the construction contract fee of 15 sect. As for the education expenses, there are many cases in which the member structure is about the cultural administrative planning project team, and this type is hidden in the policy, so it is not the right way to set forth in the provisions of Article 138-4-3 of the local autonomy law, the basic concept of the cultural administrative plan is questioned, and the business contents and contractors were questioned about 5178,000 yen. In particular, the contents of the cultural business are consigned as a business of the Board of Education and Culture Division, with the participation fee of 3,382,500 yen, the rental fee of the Cultural Hall 617,500 yen, and total of 4 million yen. In this question, it is only the opinion of the authorities about the appointment of the delegation of the delegation to the staff when storing the entrance fee of the concert as a city fee. As a result of two-day suspicion, each member gave the following opinions: 1. About financial situation. The unpaid balance of local bonds and debt burden acts in this city is状態 high even in the prefecture, and the financial index is lower than the average value of the country and the prefecture. The deterioration of financial situations accounted for the first or second place in the prefecture, so we would like to take good care of the construction of facilities in施設 with future citizens’ burden. 1. About the Work House Initially, the construction result is that 会議 was not born in this meeting. In addition, there are a lot of public halls and other similar facilities in each region as regards to educational expenses, and these are operated for each purpose, but I would like to use these public facilities as much as possible. 1.労働 fee。 In the construction of the labor center, the way to raise s from the authorities and make a part of the construction cost is a contrary to the view from the principle of the local government and from the viewpoint of the local financial law. This kind of。 has been strictly criticized as it can not lead to unfair healing of companies and local governments. These行為s are a clean and fair posture of the government, so we strongly ask that we will not disco。e these types of行為s and further expand our行為s on the construction of our work center. 1.About the cultural administrative planning project team. I would like to consider it because it is strong that it will be a hiding of future cultural administration in Narashino city. In addition, arts and culture activities in social education must be respected for the usefulness and usefulness of local residents, and the culture government must be aware of the philosophy of culture, and it must be self-developed by the general government. In that regard, the cultural administrative planning project team set forth in this compensation budget requires that it is deployed in a direction that focuses on the self-reliance or uniqueness of the cultural administration, not depending on the intention of the executor. 1.Consignment of cultural business This is the business of your choice, and it is not admitted, but since this budget is a purchase of obligatory education facilities, it should be taken with sufficient consideration in future execution. As a result of the above course, I decided that the majority of the appraisers should be allowed as a result of the decision. End reporting of the general accounting budget special committee. 〔Chairman of general accounting budget Masashi Akiyama altar〕 ○Chairman (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, Special Accounting Budget Special Chair Shijiro Kawasaki. Thank you for your interest. 〔Special Accounting Budget Special Chair Shigeo Kawasaki Speakers〕 ◆Special accounting budget special chairperson (Shijiro Kawasaki) Therefore, we will report the special accounting budget special committee according to your no。. We would like to inform you of the progress and results of the proposals made by the Special Accounting Budget Special Committee, which was established by 15 members at this meeting. First of all, it is a special accounting correction budget (No.1) for the project to organize the urban planning district of Narashino in56 year 82 of the bill, but this plan is to add 49,477,000 yen each to the year-end budget and try to make the total amount to 67,284 million yen. In the process of the examination, there was a question concerning the territory of the investigation commissioned by 22 buildings relocations related to the 57th事業 year project of the correction, and the result of this proposal was decided to be determined by the appraisal of all. Next, I would like to inform you about the special accounting compensation budget (No. 1) of Narashino City Public Se、age Project, which was proposed No. 8356. The plan is to add ¥8,730 million to the annual income budget, and the total amount is ¥47,257,77,000. In the process of the examination, there was a question about the area of the land acquisition for Tsudanuma Purification Center, which is purchased this time, and the result of this proposal was decided that all of the land should be approved in favor. Lastly, I would like to inform you about the special accounting budget for the Agenda No.84 Showa 56 Narashino City Relic Garden and the Relic Hall Project. This proposal was repro、 by changing the amount proposed at the second regular meeting of Saki, and the management expenses of Saginuma Reido are re計ed from the general accounting budget in the aging budget. First of all, this special accounting budget was proposed by the authorities in the explanation of the reason for the proposal, with a debt burden on the construction business expenses of the temporary seaside reconstruction in the last June parliament. As a result, the explanation was that we repro the business expenses as 37.5 billion yen in the lower amount than the previous one. In the process of judging, the project committee for the provisional maritime licensing project is to examine the maritime licensing plan, etc. as of January 1, 56. The committee is mainly general citizens, development public officials, and city officials. In addition, there was a response to the fact that 4 thousand yen, which was recorded as a compensation fee, is one of three general citizens. In addition, in regard to the changes in the main 園en business, the area reduced the size of the 場en, the location to construct the 屋en, the cost of maintenance around the 場en, the relationship of the design supervision cost, and the contents of the reduction of the work, etc. were questioned. After the Q&A session, a correction was submitted from a member. The content is to make a limit of 37.5 billion yen to 20 billion yen. So, firstly, after asking for an explanation of the reason for the proposal of the proposed proposal, I did a question and answer to this. In that case, the act of the debt burden of the proposal is deeply related to the proposal No. 63. The Proposal No. 63 shows the results of a large reduction of the cemetery fee in the committee review, and the reason for respecting it was to try to calculate the limit of the debt burden action. After the Q&A session, the discussions were made, and the proposals were made by the three committee members and four members. After the revision, we decided to make a decision about the original draft, and this proposal was decided to make a revision as follows. End the report of the special accounting budget special committee. 〔Special Accounting Budget Special Chair Shigeo Kawasaki altar〕 ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) This is a question of the current chairperson's report. [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) I acknowledge that there is no doubt. Q&A More discussions. There is a notification, so we will allow se tial remarks. No.26 Rio Ozawa Thank you for your interest. ◆No.26 (Mr. Toshio Ozawa) Proceedings ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Yes ◆No.26 (Mr. Toshio Ozawa) ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) Yes, rest. 451 p.m. Rest------52 p.m. Rest ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Continue to open the meeting before resting. No.26 Rio Ozawa Thank you for your interest. 〔No.26 Toshio Ozawa〕 ◆No.26 (Mr. Toshio Ozawa) has been approved by the chairperson, and the chairperson of the civil welfare permanent chairperson and the special accounting budget special chairperson, we will discuss the enactment of the Ordinance on the establishment and management of the Agenda No.63, Kaihin Garden and Saginuma Hall. First of all, we will explain the opinions on the establishment of the Proposal No. 63 Narashino Seaside Garden and Saginuma Hall. In March this year, the first regular meeting of the 1st meeting of the 1st meeting of the emergency questions received the proposals for the 2nd meeting of the 2nd meeting, the progress of the decision in the parliament, the review of the proposals for the 3rd meeting of the 3rd meeting of the meeting, and the general question, the discussion on the 園 and the execution department and the parliament. The issue of delegation and interpretation of contracts concerning the construction of the cemetery of the cemetery for the development public, and the problem that the development public has already ordered more than 3 billion yen, the issue of debt liability for this, and the issue of the cemetery business development public before the budget resolution in the parliament, and the issue of illegality of the consolidation rights and決 rights. The posture to the parliament of the refugees may be subject to change in business due to the guidance of the pre ural government, and as one of the members of the parliament, I do not think that I will never be preferred. This is a request for strong rebellion. In addition, in regards to illegal matters, we have received an audit request from citizens and a response from the Audit Committee to this, and we have extended to the stage of administrative litigation. I would like to avoid mentioning this because it is only waiting for judicial decisions. What was the trend of the citizens in with the deter between the parliament and the dinosaurs that had been raised above? I would like to follow the progress of the document on this issue, such as a media report that seems to play the role of the situation in the parliament and the public relations of the city. First of all, as we mentioned earlier, we announced that we are accepting 3 thousand applications from April 15. At the same time, the information and application guidelines of the facility are announced and the planned price of the rental fee is announced. On March 15th, we will hold a PR campaign to start accepting three thousand units for the first period from April 15th. On March 19th, there is a report on this issue with the title of “over 1 million yen including the Tombstone of Takanehana Seaside Priest Garden” by the daily newspaper. Next, on April 1st, we announced that it will be decided after the resolution of the parliament on public relations Narashino, permanent rental and administrative fees. At the same time, the breakdown of the total business expenses has been announced. On April 6th, Chiba Nippo explains this problem with the expression of "The land of the residence of the refuge to the world is the flower of Takane". In the middle of April, I think that it is a paper of the association that thinks about Narashino, but the first newspaper folded, edited the seaside 園en special feature, and pointed out a number of questions about the title of the 園en business with many unknown points. On the first day of June, we have announced the results of public relations Narashino and the second spiritual garden survey. The number of surveys is 4,017. In the middle of June, the second newspaper was folded to think about Narashino, and the title of “Kaihama Relic Garden for Citizens” is reported on the construction costs and public questions. On July 1st, the article about the closing of July 14th is posted. On July 1st and 2nd, the report reported that the proposal was denied by Yomiuri Shimbun, Asahi Shimbun, the regular committee in the parliament and the budget committee. And the title is "A、 to parliament ignoring", "A工事 to work alone". And on July 5th, the daily newspaper, “What’s the Seaside Relic Garden of Narashino?” On the 7th of July, there is a report that the deliberation of the cemetery of the cemetery was decided at this meeting. On the 8th of July, there is a report on the daily newspaper and the Yomiuri Shimbun that the resident audit request was submitted to the cemetery issue. On July 25th, the Tsudanuma Times newspaper folded, and the title of the “2,806 cemetery purchaser’s confusion” was reported. On the 15th of August, a report of 2,806 applicants and 96.9% initially scheduled to be announced. On the 15th of August, the city council announced the deter and deter of the 園en-related proposal. On the 5th of September, the Asahi Shimbun, the title of “Advancement of Audit Request Gate” has been reported that the audit committee has seen. On September 13th, the Keiyo Times reported the contents of the meeting with the city council and citizens as the title of the “園en for citizens”. On September 15th and 16th, the Yomiuri Shimbun and the daily newspaper reported administrative litigation. The title of "Infringement of the self-government law" and "Cancellation of reconstruction of reconstruction" has been posted. On September 18, Chiba Nippo and Asahi Shimbun, September regular meeting started. There was a report on the title of "The Seaside Relic Garden Problem Focused" and "Repro。 the Seaside Relic Garden". In the middle of September, there is a report that claims to return to the origin and reconstruct the plan, as the title of "The cheaper citizens cemetery". As we mentioned above, on February 1st, the number of documents that I would like to see or touched by the citizens has increased to twenty as many as I researched. In the way of thinking and expression, things that are not always written in a fair position are scattered, but I think that the number of materials given to the citizens to predict and judge the 園en problem is never less. In such a situation, the citizens came to the city from mist to dinosaurs, and the sampling from the mist, and of course, there was a slight burden on the price of the rental fee, etc., but I think that there was 2,806 when the number of people who applied by the will. Let’s take this as a quiet movement of the citizens, different from the movements in the parliament. Now, let's think that there is a lot of long-term rental fee that seems to be high in the brain of the citizens who applied. Then, let’s imagine the 、yards that have been つ down by the outside. Alternatively, if you don’t have to be outdated, you may wish to do so. According to the revised plan, the rental fee is ¥26,000, so it became cheaper if it is expected that it was originally. However, if the cemetery was used as a product, the value of the product was significantly lowered. It is very natural that it will be cheaper if you lower the product value. Therefore, there is a place where you can feel a lot of danger to the intention of the citizen with this. If the parliament does the correction so far, I think that it is not possible to collect the intention of citizens as a parliament to more Sivia. In addition, the situation assumed by this amendment is very complex. The procedure that all the processing should be completed at the counter of the Funeral Business Division will be separated from the contract of the cemetery. In some cases, it must be carried out by the development company. When the cemetery is mixed in one area, it depends on the number of hands, such as setting the boundary, method of construction, and衝 with neighboring landowners. If you are undoubted, and you can separate the area where you are outside, you will have to redo all the application for the past compartments. I think that all negative factors will increase to citizens. Next, I would like to express my opinion on the bill No.84, the 84en of Narashino City and the special accounting budget for the堂ido business. According to the chairperson report, this project must be re事業ed in the second table, debt burden, and temporary maritime reconstruction project costs to 20 billion yen. However, if the annual usage fee is set to 261 thousand yen, this project must be inevitably covered by 7.61 thousand yen for 7.5 billion yen and 1185 trillion yen, so the value of the financial source that repeats the difference between 20 billion and 1835 trillion yen from the general account is inappropriate. It is also the basis of the calculation based on the monthly rental fee of 260,000 yen. If you are trying to do the construction at the remaining cost that you cut off the construction cost of the saijo, my investigation showed that the following problems in the cemetery construction were raised. The first thing is that the Saiba is cut, and the toilet is lost. In addition, this office and the administrative office are pre-conferences with the prefecture, and it is obliged that this burial office and the burial office should be installed in the law enforcement rules of cemetery burial, etc. Next, as a problem that is expected by cutting off the cemetery, there will be a problem that the toiletry problem that has been raised now, and there will be an external light in the cemetery due to the absence of a change room planned in the cemetery. Next, there is no problem that the public telephone, broadcasting facilities, and the rest of the parties involved in the cemetery, so I think that it is necessary to quickly budget and make this fit, but there is a serious problem that the budget to do these in the previous revision is not popular. Next, it is a problem because it is uninstalled, but because of the relationship of doing work outside, it is necessary to make a border between the neighbors for each section of each division. The budget for this boundary is generally calculated by the development company, but it is necessary to find a budget of about 30 million yen to do this in red plastic, but this budget is not included in the amendment. What kind of means will the special committee solve this problem? The way of thinking is unclear as long as we ask the chairperson report. If you are trying to solve the problem points that have been raised in the limit of 260,000 yen, the value of the cemetery used by the citizen will be further down. I have pointed out the problem for two proposals, but I will explain the idea of the two proposals here. Regarding the construction and application contract procedures for the first three thousand units, it is hoped to be out of the contract at the time of the contract, and completion of the construction procedure as the current idea except those who are transferred to the outside area after the second phase of the proposal. For the Saiba, after the process of suing the intention of citizens by some way, the construction is carried out by considering the introduction of the necessary minimum facilities from the general accounting. 2 points above. As soon as I am, I am a wise member. Parliament is a representative of citizens. If the parliament decides the municipal cemetery for citizens so far, it should be decided to construct a cemetery that is easy to use, easy to cemetery, not ashamed to be seen from others. The parliament is now trying to make a significant conclusion to the citizens’ business, but is there any place to recons the revision? The meeting of the parliament has a principle of unrevo , but since there is no conclusion in this conference, I think that the committee will take a commutation method of repayment. How about the chairperson? How about the students? However, I think that it is already determined by each member and the decision about this matter. Assuming that the revision is decided by both chairpersons, I will ask you for help and staff. It is the spirit of vanity that parliament is required to the executive department in this regard. It is not to do the shining of the Baba member, but according to the Hirokien, the vanity of the kai is "there is no feeling of心にgnation and goodness". It is the heart that I was supple. In order to make the cemetery for citizens quickly, we will consider the deliberation of the parliament to make the cemetery for the citizens. If the deliberation of the parliament is impossible, we will ask you to take action to the parliament with the spirit, and I will end my debate. [No.26 Toshio Ozawa altar] ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, No.13 Nobusha. Thank you for your interest. 〔No.13 Nobuo-kun Baba〕 ◆No.13 (Baba Shinzoku) I clarify the opinions of the parties on the installation and management of the Proposal No.63 Seaside Relics and Saginuma Relics, and the amendments to the special accounting budget of the Proposal No.84 Showa 56 Narashino City Relics and the Relics Project. The Narashino City Relic Garden Project proposed as a business cost of 455,200 million to the June regular meeting of 56, and the parliament has decided and proposed to the parliament with a business cost of 36,566 million. The problem that the party pointed out in the June regular meeting is that we proposed a budgeting of 455,200 million business expenses, and 352 million was executed without parliament. This is a politic posture of parliament ignorance, which is a remarkable abuse of 執行 enforcement rights and does not match the clean and p。 parliament democracy of citizenship. This pointing out, however, has been rationalized with a significantly deviation of the開発s of the Development Public Corporation. Such expansion interpretation and its rationalization are the solemnity of the global environment, and it is the a。 of the development public and municipal government, and is not allowed. Our party is strongly demanding to renew the political posture of this refuge and repeat the same mistake again. The cemetery project is計画 citizen expectations from the planning stage and must be a business that meets the needs of citizens. The long-term rental fee proposed by the regular meeting of June was 661 thousand yen. We have said that parties should be sold at a cheaper price and that is possible. Currently, we are strengthening the actual situation of citizens. The Tokyo Metropolitan Government Consumer Price Index announced on September 25 is a 3.9% increase compared to the previous year. This is a big rise that continued in August. On October 2nd, the Ministry of Labour announced a survey on work statistics in August, showing that the actual労働者 of workers has a negative 0.5% compared to the previous year for the first time in five months, and the company has a high level of 115 million. It must not be said that the real tax increase, public rate increase, social insurance claims, etc. caused by income tax reduction of governments and private parties, have shown serious negligence. In such a place, the sale of the cemetery of the cemetery is of course, and it is necessary to make more effort. We are looking forward to seeing you again. The price is 34%. It is opposite to incorporate the cemetery price to the outer construction, which should be addressed to such citizen's request, which will only buy the land and plan to build the cemetery. Saiba is the largest scale in Chiba Prefecture, with a construction cost of 500 million yen. In our policy, this construction cost is the burden of the cemetery purchaser, and the proportion of the cemetery price is 12% and about 80,000 yen. Citizens who want to cemetery in the citizens are the cemetery they need and are not the cemetery. Our party is against the beneficiary burden principle of Saiba construction. As urbanization progresses, it is necessary to be a city facility. This must be built as a funeral project, including the general accounting budget in the following。 year. The revision of the chairperson's report is to remove the construction cost and the construction cost of the cemetery from the cemetery price, and the cemetery is 265,000 yen, and the cemetery is free of citizens, and the cemetery incorporates the citizen's request, and is intended for the execution right of the cemetery. Well, there is such an opinion that there is no confusion to the citizens who are already 混乱 up in such a fix. This problem is caused by the abuse of executive rights that you have executed the business without parliament approval, and is your responsibility. However, it is necessary to take care not to cause confusion. In the first place, the 市民 that purchases as desired to the citizens who have been s。pted outside is possible to determine the current execution rights of 。. Secondly, since all the first periods are outward, the opinion that if there is a desire to be outward, it will not be possible to make a compartment. If you share the part of the first term, it will not occur. Thirdly, there are opinions that there are toilets, administrative offices, power transmission facilities, broadcasting facilities, and these problems. It is necessary to set up as a management fixture in general accounting just like these administrative facilities. In these considerations, however, I will end my debate with a strong desire to continue the construction of a spiritual garden based on citizens’ requirements. 〔No.13 Nobuo-kun altar〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, Masanori Sato. Thank you for your interest. (No.6 Masanori Sato) ◆No.6 (Mr. Masanori Sato) I will take a discussion from the opposite of the 園en, which was fixed by the Civil Welfare Standing Committee on the Proposal No.63 andクラブ, representing the City Government Club. In the last June parliament, it has been decided by a minority on the enactment of the Ordinance on the installation of the Proposal No. 50 Narashino Seaside Relics Garden and Saginuma Relics Hall. If you look at the breakdown, we will cut out 2,062, 4481 exterior work, 1st floor 斎-style cut, 2nd floor Japanese-style cut, 1st floor Higashiya, warehouse and parking lot. However, it is planned to be outdated and outdated, and it is modified so that you can choose freely, and the usage fee is also adjusted. The 福祉 that has been fixed at the last Minute Welfare Standing Committee is like a nawa方式 method to cut off the Saiba, cut all the outside and eliminate all facilities. It seems to be a rough to imagine just the of the country. This is the city of Narashino. Even if the price is low, it seems that there is no satisfaction in the result. The application began on July 1st, but there is also a plan for the completion of the Kaihin 園en, Narashino City, which was passed to the applicant, and the model was displayed, and the applicant expects to be a refreshing 園en as in the brochure. When we collect the opinions of the cemetery applicants, the cemetery of Narashino City is close to the cemetery, and it is wonderful that we can go to the cemetery if you walk. There are a lot of phone calls from the applicant to my home. Although I can’t respond immediately, I have a budget for you to apply for the cemetery, and the cemetery is used for a long time as the cemetery of the grandson, so it is said that I want a splendid park cemetery regardless of the expensive. The second landfill is already in Akitsu and Kasumi. The meeting place and office of the housing complex are in each town, but I was looking forward to the completion of the seaside relic garden, not the size of funeral, legal matters, etc. We believe that these things should be good for citizens’ interests, not for citizens, but for citizens. Here, it is obviously the opposite of the part that was fixed at the civil welfare permanent committee, hurting the mind that it will not be able to destroy the history of the hometown Narashino for any reason. We will discuss the above. [No.6 Masanori Sato descent] ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, Mr. Kuno, No. 7 Thank you for your interest. [Participate in the 7th Kuno-kun Tamachi] ◆7 (Kuno-kun Tamachi) The chairperson will discuss the proposed amendments to the Proposal No. 63 and Proposal No.84 proposed to the Proposal Meeting. First of all, the proposal No. 63 was proposed to the last 6 month regular meeting, and it is determined by the minority. And some modifications are made and repro、 to this regular meeting. However, in this case where the citizen’s request is not in , the political posture of the outside director is pointed out as a mistake in the button from the start point, and it is not yet convinced. This amendment is made from the viewpoint of enriching citizen welfare, including those, to make it easier for citizens to get a permanent rental fee, and it seems to be natural. One of the contents is that they cut the place, but the citizens are trying to seek the cemetery of the cemetery as the predecessor of the Baba, and are not trying to seek the place. This is because it is a beneficiary burden, it reflects the voice of citizens that there is no need to buy to the cemetery wisher to the cemetery. The second one should be entrusted to the free selection of the applicant about the outsour。, and it is said that it should be transferred at the time of the construction of civil engineering and external construction. Therefore, it agrees to the amendment of the proposal No. 63. Next, the bill No.84 is to change the limit of the act of the debt burden in。 with the amendment committee of the bill No. 63, and this is also considered to be the best. According to the explanation of the above, it seems that the total cost of work was divided by 7,100 of the base of the time as a permanent rental fee. Therefore, this time, it is set to be 260,000 yen. If the debt burden limit is 20 billion, the residual amount of ¥14,690 million will appear. I think that there are some points that were pointed out by Mr. Ozawa earlier. Therefore, I think that it is reasonable that the debt burden limit is 20 billion yen. Therefore, it is agreed to the revision of the proposal No.84. I would like to express my gra . 〔7 田 久之君 altar〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, I would like to give a lecture, Mr. Tokichi Ebisu, 28. 〔#28 Tokiyoshi-kun, Ebisu〕 ◆No.28 (Hiruki Tsuneyoshi) I will take a discussion from the opposite position for this revision. I understand that the proposals that I talked about were repro as this proposal No.63 and No.84. Therefore, I have a position to support the original design and counter the revision. In February and March of this year, it has been a hot topic for citizens as a public request for several years and years, and many people who waited for this day are supported. It is a story that 2,806 applicants were killed in a short period of three months for the submission of 2,4.5 Wards, with a presentation of 9,416 thousand yen to 4.5 sq.m., and 500,000 of two Wards, under the conditions proposed by the previous June parliament. The contents of this project are clearly acquainted with citizens through public relations, and the applicants are judged to be an application after understanding well. However, since the predecessor was not proposed to the parliament, the budget installation ordinance for reasons such as the re ement fee is too high, the re ation of the predecessor, the half-decrease of the predecessor’s cemetery, etc., was repro。 with the attitude of respect for parliament. I have a lot of doubt about whether this modification will lead to the actual benefit of the entrant. Some people want to cemetery and leave for a few years. Some people want to use it shortly, others leave for a few years and move to another city in a few years later, and some people want to be cheaper and expensive. In addition, there is no negligence for people who are unnecessary to go to the saiba, rest area, relaxation square, parking lot. Therefore, these people have the advantages of free selection. However, it is natural that most people, or equivalents, do not just beautify their own cemetery, but the surroundings are filled with compartments, and the aesthetics of a modern cemetery symbolizing the culture, are desired, and it is a big problem that the らyard of the rose irregular shape repents for 100 years in Narashino City. There was also a discussion of a certain committee member that I would be able to select free if I aggregate the district and organize it with one external reception desk for my debate that I bitten such a nuance at the special budget committee. Another skeleton of this amendment is the conclusion that it is not necessary to im。 the cemetery of the cemetery of the cemetery of the cemetery of the cemetery of the cemetery of the cemetery of the cemetery of the cemetery of the cemetery. I think that the burden of the cause is of course, and there is a morality as a thing that is necessary to protect the incident in an園 relationship with the cemetery. It is not convinced that all incidental facilities are disco ed. Indeed, I think this is a problem. In the first place, I think this is also a problem, how can I escape if the unexpected rain falls during the cemetery with family or child etc. The second point is that the 参san rests on the 参s, the food, the inconvenience of tea, and this is a problem that the citizens who made it always lament. Also, as the third point, the reality that there is no light even if it gets dark sometimes, but I can not take such measures because I put all the budget here today. What to do in this case? In the fourth place, what about the season of the cold wind blowing, the parking lot by the budget cut, and the cemetery without a toilet? As the fifth point, I think that it is one of the necessary conditions for those who are thick of belief. However, it is true that it is not very important to the citizens of the cemetery who encountered it, and there is no mistake. In addition, I think that there is a free selection section as the original plan, and it is the most administrative way to think about the freedom and profit of the citizens. By the way, I don’t think that I can’t engage in private matters, but at this time, I would like to give it a reference from the perspective that relates to the interests of citizens. I will build a stone pagoda at the end of this month, but I think that it is not possible as an example of outside when making a cemetery individually. I would like to align the numbers of the cost. However, in my case, it is very expensive than the usual personal trading price. The occupancy rate is about 50% for the total cost of work. The whiteness of Migaki, width 10.9 scale, depth 7 scale. First of all, there are concrete, 108 thousand yen, 2 stairs, 297,900 yen, 2 pillars, 1 pagoda stand, 70,700 yen with stainless steel metal fittings, 243,800 yen for basic concrete construction including exterior construction cost, existing block breaking, etc. However, there is a difference between 1.5 square meters and 4.5 square meters, and 350,000. It is from the difference between cemetery orders and individual orders, and it is understood that it is the price accepted by the operator for the first time making large orders. If this is an all-free choice, it is different from the shape of the outer, the shape of the pillar, the material, etc. by individual hope, and it will be diverse, and even the price and the same material as the existing stone, it is expected to be a considerable interruption, so if you think about the profit of the citizen, I think that this proposed draft is a good consideration. Therefore, I am strongly aware of the opposite in the judgment that this revision is too far. 〔No.28 Tokiyoshi-kun altar〕 ○President (Keiichi Kawamoto) Next, Mr.崎ichi Tachisaki. Thank you for your interest. [No.17: Seiichi Tachizaki] ◆No.17 (Seikazu Tachizaki) I will discuss the revision report of the chairperson of each permanent chair on the bill No. 63 and bill No.84. Looking back, the process of setting up this cemetery business was an event of ignorance of the local autonomy law and repetition of the city council ignore. Originally, at the end of the six-month parliament, the 園 had a violation of the local autonomy law, Article 96(1) and below. Therefore, it is natural that it was rejected by the city council in the June parliament. However, it is clear that you have continued the soil construction of the cemetery even after that. In addition to ignoring the law or ignoring the parliament, it is said that it is not something other than the thoughtful attitude that neither the law nor the parliament nor the dinosaur do not use. However, I will point out that there was a background that I couldn’t do so. In other words, because there is a title for the remodeling company that the president is. In other words, the business cost of the remodeling company is more than 10,000 million yen. In addition, as noted in the September issue published by the Narashino-Kaikai, the suspicion of whether the remodeling company is intervened with external construction is not solved by the 公表 avoided the publication of the company name of the stone construction company. Anyway, the chairperson of the committee to the price of the citizens in such a correction is a very groundbreaking thing, and if this is determined at this meeting, it is exactly the victory of the Narashino City Council and it is a pleasure. Anyway, this is a very natural thing, such as the abolition of the unimaginable saiba, which is said to have a huge construction cost in this 園yard business, and the abolition of the unimaginable saiba that houses 400 people. However, it is said that every time you see that you are stubbornly sticking to this two is that your plan is completely boned. In other words, it is a proof that the plan of the original design that the company has developed is not the same, and it was the plan of the remodeling public company. Therefore, if this is determined at this conference, it is also a factual disappointment in the Narashino City Council against you. Anyway, it is not to say that this cemetery business has been fixed, and it is not that the violation of the local autonomy law or the act of ignoring the city council has been eliminated. Lastly, the price of 260 thousand yen per annum is the price that everyone of the citizen can get, and it will end with a draft. More 〔#17 Seiichi Tachizaki altar〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Next, Yoshio Inoue 29. Thank you for your interest. [Participation in No.29: Yoshio Inoki] ◆No.29 (Yoshio Uchiki) There is a part that has been said, so it is a discussion on the correction part in the proposal of the seaside relics related to No.63 and No.84. This proposal was revised and repro、 after the June parliament, but the skeleton should be fully aware of the matters of the parliament in the June parliament. The second is focused on the 園en business that does not give anxiety to citizens of 2,806 already registered as a reservation application, and account for the main contents that have been repro、. In the last day of the 2nd regular meeting, we clarify that we work closely with the parliament and clarify that we work. In particular, in the executive organization, we strive to accurately understand the intentions of each member and each member, centering on the assistant role, and repro。 the business contents. In addition, the citizens are reported by public relations, reports of parliament debates by parliament reports, news centering on large newspapers, the Keiyo Times and Tsudanuma Times. However, the citizens are expecting a park cemetery that is suitable for the seaside cemetery to the municipal authorities and the parliament, especially for this report. At present, the applicant will visit the application desk for each individual, and will make a reservation and make a reservation. The proposed amendment shall be 260,000 yen for permanent use, and the debt burden limit is 20 billion yen. It is the contents of the cemetery centered on earth construction. It tends to be a form that provides a high cemetery as a result of the fact that there is the advantage of doing freely from the relationship of exterior construction etc. The basis of the debt burden limit is also lacking clarity. In particular, there is no財 of securing financial resources, and it is natural that Shinshu people, especially those who are looking forward to using the Saiba, are required. It is not advisable that the people who came to the cemetery in the cemetery do not come to the rest place, the management office, the toilet etc. In the cemetery, there is no external light in the cemetery, and there is no built-in of the power station, the cemetery is just a ghost town with dusk. I have to say that it is rough. If the scale etc. of the saijo is not considered during the soil construction, it corresponds to the scale such as水age and drainage work, and various construction contents that require basic design are included. It is an attitude that the cemetery construction that does not give anxiety and a。sion to 2,806 applicants is desired by the council. We will end the discussion with the citizens' requests and free revisions. 〔No.29 内記義夫君 altar〕 ○Chair (Keiichi Kawamoto) Next, 20th Keiichiro Hattori. Thank you for your interest. [No.20 Keiichiro Hattori] ◆No.20 (Keiichiro Hattori) I will participate in the discussion on the establishment of the Proposal No. 63, Kaihin Garden in Narashino City and Saginuma Reido, as well as the special budget of the Proposal No.84 Narashino City Relics Garden and the Relics Office. The proposal has already been denied to the 2nd June regular meeting, and the party has not revealed the response, but it has been repro。 this time, and a certain evaluation is to have been made to reduce the business and lower the usage fee, but it is unfortunate to have to make corrections to the original proposal. This business is that it is not possible to return to the origin from the beginning of the procedure and method. As a cemetery for the citizens of the city, this project that cannot be restored at the time of the start, taking into account the city’s financial situation and the burden of the cemetery purchaser, will be placed on the track as soon as possible. Therefore, we need to carefully respond to the effects of this revision and avoid confusions to those who have already applied. In addition, as a cemetery purchaser, all citizens survey the need to re-build the cemetery, scale, etc. as early as possible. In the meantime, the cemetery will not be inconvenient due to breaks, etc., and shall be taken into account so that the cemetery can respond sufficiently within the worker's packing place. In addition, when purchasing a cemetery for people who are weak in society, we will discuss the opinions and requests that will be taken into consideration in the twelve minutes. [No.20 Keiichiro Hattori] ○The discussion with the Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) has ended. Is there any other discussion? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) I acknowledge that there is no discussion. This will end the discussion. I will go to the採. The order of the採 will be determined se。tially from the proposal attached to the General Affairs Standing Committee for each committee. First of all, we will collect all three proposals, no. 60 and no. 62. The chairperson's report on the proposal is decided. The three proposals will be asked for the raison of the raison to decide as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, the three proposals were accepted as the original. Next, we will collect two proposals: Proposal No. 79 and Proposal No. 80. The report of the chairperson to the proposal is a decision. The two proposals will be asked for the commendation of you to decide as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, the two proposals were decided. Next, we will issue No.64 of the proposals attached to the Construction Standing Committee. The chairperson's report on the proposal is a decision. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, the bill No. 64 was accepted as the original proposal. Secondly, we will collect two proposals, No. 66 and No. 71. The report of the chairperson to the proposal is a decision. The two proposals will be asked for the commendation of you to decide as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, the two proposals were decided. Next, we will issue No. 63 of the proposals attached to the Civil Welfare Standing Committee. The chairperson's report on this proposal is fixed, so first, we will make a decision to modify the committee. We will ask for the launch of the committee's proposal. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the revision of the committee was decided. Next, we will make a decision on the original proposal except the part that has been fixed. We will ask for the raise of you who agrees to decide the other part except the correction part as the original. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, other parts except the part of the resolution was decided as the original. Next, we will issue No. 65 of the proposals attached to the教 Committee. The report of the chairperson to this proposal is consented. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, the Proposal No. 65 has decided to agree to this. Next, we will collect four proposals 67 and 70. The chairperson's report on the proposal 4 is determined. The 4 proposals will be asked for the raison of the deter。 of the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, 4 proposals were accepted. Next, we will issue No. 81 of the proposals attached to the general accounting budget special committee. The chairperson's report on the proposal is a decision. This proposal will ask for the raison of your app。。 to resolve as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the bill No. 81 was accepted as the original proposal. Next, we will collect two proposals 82 and 83 of the proposal, which were attached to the special accounting budget special committee. The report of the chairperson to the proposal is a decision. The two proposals will be asked for the commendation of you to decide as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, the two proposals were accepted as the original. Next, we will issue the proposal No.84. The chairperson's report on this proposal is fixed, so first, we will make a decision to modify the committee. We will ask for the launch of the committee's proposal. 〔Priorship〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is a large number of standing. Therefore, the revision of the committee was decided. Next, we will make a decision on the original proposal except the part that has been fixed. We will ask for the raise of you who agrees to decide the other part except the correction part as the original. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, other parts except the part of the resolution was decided as the original. Next, we will make a request. First of all, we will make a sampling of the contract No. 45 and the No. 46. The report of the chairperson for the two submissions will be accepted. We will ask for the commendation of each of you to decide the two submissions as reported by the chairman. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, we decided to send two proposals. Next, we have decided to issue No.47 of the petition that was attached to the construction permanent committee. The chairperson's report on this request is accepted. We will ask for the 立 of you who agrees to resolve this request as reported by the chairperson. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, we decided to send the proposal. --- --- --- △ Proposal No. 72 and Proposal No. 78 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) The agenda of the Agenda No.3, No.72 and No.78 In with the provisions of Article 117 of the Local Autonomy Act, you will be asked to leave Tsuneyoshi Ebisu. 〔No.28 Tokiyoshi-kun, Ebisu〕 ○The chairperson (Keisuke Kawamoto) requests the report of the chairperson. Ms. Abe, Chairman of the Board of Education Thank you for your interest. 〔Chairman Abe Mikuni Speaker〕 ◆Mr. Abe, Chairman of the Board of Education, will report to the Board of Education. We will report the progress of the examination and the results in a b。 for the 7 acquisitions of the Proposal No. 72 and Proposal No. 78. The seven Kindergartens and elementary school gymnasiums are intended to be acquired by the Development Corporation. The contract and design outsour work for the construction of the building and the contents, etc., was done by the request from the development public, and there was a question of whether the office fee is reasonable, and whether it is considered full-fledged about the ratio of office expenses in the future. On the other hand, there was a response that the authorities would like to discuss the administrative expenses between the Development Corporation and the other cities in the vicinity paid based on it. After Q&A, I decided that all of the採s should be determined by the end of the discussion. Ends the report of the教y Committee. 〔Chairman Abe Michikun altar〕 ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) This is a question of the current chairperson's report. Are there any questions? 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 The contract and design supervision work is actually done by the request from the development company, and it explains in detail. 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe, Chairman of the Board of Education, Mr. Kazuyoshi Aihara, 32. Request a response. ◆Mr. Abe will answer. Even though we are entrusted to the Development Corporation, it is important that all the city staff members have met their work and the staff have directly entered the design or construction content. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) It is not strange to ask the city from the development company to the development company. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆Mr. Abe, for example, I think that all the city was a supervisory authority for the selection or separating orders of the company. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) I have a consultation with the Development Corporation to pay administrative expenses, but what is the content of this consultation? 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆Mr. Abe discussed the administrative expenses, and on January 28, 50, consultation with the city and the public was established. If you did not have a special question about the contents, it is like this. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) does not examine the contents of the consultation. What is it? 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆Mr. Abe (Mr. Abe) There is a response for the percent etc. according to the amount. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Is it the answer?) ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆I think that there was a response that I had to say about the more than one billion yen, the more than one billion yen, the more than one hundred million yen, the more than one hundred percent. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆It is No.32 (Issei Aihara), so I examined 7 of the results, so 7 of the total amount is indicated in the proposal. So, how much you paid for 7 of yours? 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆Please make a memo with Mr. Abe. Issue 72 is 1.25%. I think that the school is the same as 73... ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) 1.25? ◆Chairperson of the教ist (Mr. Abe) Yes, it is Fujisaki Elementary School and Kindergarten. I think it is 1.25 for Proposal 74 and 75. I think it is the same. Then, I think the number 76 and77 are the same, but 1%. Then I think the 78 issue is the same. That is. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) Yes, I was. 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) The percentage was changed. There is a response that I would like to consider in the future, but I would like to consider it in the future though it is not higher than other cities in the neighborhood. This is a problem with administrative expenses, so it is a very big impact on the finances of Narashino City, but I would like to ask you what you want to consider. 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆Mr. Abe, the Chairman of the Board of Education (Mr. Abe) As I thought earlier, I saw the city about the work, etc., so I was sure that I could not understand the administrative expenses. However, as an authority, it is very small compared to other cities, and it is not the amount as much as the amount in this percentage. As you can see calculations, there are several staffs in the development company, and in fact, even if the city is doing all, it is not full, so there are a lot of carrying rates, so it was a reply that I would like to admit about this, but I think that it is the answer because there is a instruction that is more strongly considering than the committee. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) I am a response from the chairperson of the current chairperson, but I answered it, so the answer is that it is high, and it will be considered in the future, but it is better to take such a response. 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆I didn’t think it was a kind of interpretation. However, it is very supple to consider it, but I report it to the chairperson report because it is a strong request from a committee member. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Kazumasa Aihara 32. ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) Considering that there is such a request is that it is not raised if it is not lower, so it is good to understand this. 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆The chairperson of the s ptor (Mr. Abe) The executive committee does not respond to the contents. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. More ◆No.32 (Issei Aihara) Yes, it is. ○Is there any other question? 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Mr. Sato, No. 9 ◆No.9 (Sato Tobari) was constructed in the54 year 54. In addition, No. 74 and No. 75 were contracted by kindergarten and elementary school. However, there are differences between Mukoyama Kindergarten and Sato Kogyo who received elementary school. We will ask you whether or not you have been deliberated by the contents of the discussion. [Chairperson] ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe, Chairman of the grammar, Mr. Sato Tobari, No. 9 Request a response. ◆Mr. Abe, I'm not very busy, but I heard it a little. Don't try again. Not Found ○Please do it again. ◆No.9 (Sato Tobari) Yes, I was. Proposal No.72, No.73, this is the same company. In addition, the agenda No. 74, No. 75, this construction contract was constructed both in 1979, but the unit price of 1 square meter is Fujisaki, Kotoyama, and Koto, there is a difference of 23,000 yen, and tsubo unit price 60,000 yen. 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕 ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆I think there was no question about the subject. 〔There is a person called “Yes”〕

○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Mr. Sato, No. 9 ◆No.9 (Sat-kun Tobari) It is unavoidable that there was no question, but at the time of contract with the construction contract of the development public company, it is not considered by the city council, specification, or design, etc., so I would like to buy the received in the 54th year in the future, so I would like to make the same after the resolution, and I told you that I will do all the consultation with school construction and the public business of such city. ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) Ms. Abe ◆Chairperson (Mr. Abe) There was no such question. ◆No.9 (Sato Tobari) ○Is there any other question? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) I acknowledge that there is no doubt. Q&A More discussions. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. Is there any discussion? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) I acknowledge that there is no discussion. This will end the discussion. I will go to the採. We will collect 7 proposals from No. 72 and No. 78. The chairperson's report on the proposal 7 is determined. The seven proposals will be asked for the commendation of you as determined by the chairman's report. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, 7 of the proposal was decided. We will cancel the removal of Mr. Tsuneyoshi Ebisu. [No.28 Tokiyoshi-kun]------ △Contract application No.48 during closing ○President (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) The agenda of the co。ation examination during the closing of the application No. 4 ---昭和56 September 30, 56 Chairman of Narashino City Council Kiyoshi Kawamoto Chairman of the General Affairs Committee Akizo Yamanoi Closing Judgment Application Form The Committee decided that the following cases will be subject to continuous screening. The number of articles for remarks for the remarks of the application for the survival of Kyosei Tani Yuen Park No. 48. Many praise--- ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) has a proposal of a co。ation newer at the time of the closing of the application for the sub-committee of the sub-committee of the General Affairs Committee. Thank you for your understanding. We are now agenda, and the Commission No. 48 will ask for the 立 of you who agrees to apply for a co。al review during the closing. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is a response. Therefore, the Commission No. 48 was decided to apply to the co ation review during the closing as the chairperson submits. --- --- --- △Adding a meeting schedule, Proposal No. 1 (No explanation of the reason for proposal and completion) ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) The first proposal was submitted and accepted from the 9 outside of Akizo Yamanoi. ---56意見 (The 3rd Regular Meeting of the Narashino City Council in 56) Proposal No. 1 Proposal of opinions on land-fixed assets tax will be submitted in条 with the provisions of Article 14 of the Narashino City Council Regulation. On October 6, 56, Mr. Yoshio Kawamoto, Chairman of the Narashino City Council, Submitted by Akizo Yamanoi, Associate of the Council of Narashino City Council, Hisashi Takino 〃 Masayuki Kokura 〃 〃 〃 Masajiro Kawasaki 〃 Seiichi崎zaki 〃 Yoshio 〃 Yoshio Yokoi 〃 〃 Junhei Yoshida 〃 Kazusei Aihara, Associate of the government tax revised. However, the main farming products are imbalanced supply and demand due to the reduction of the price of the perforated farming products, strengthening the second phase of the rice paddy restructuring, importing and changing the structure of eating habits. In addition, the government reforms are considered as the second臨ion, and the direction of the reduction of subsidies for agriculture is seen, etc., which has become an unprecedented severe environment and face serious crisis. If this tax is strengthened under such circumstances, it is clear that many of the農業 management in the urbanization area cannot be broken down. In other regions, it is clear that future経営 management continues to be in境 difficult. On the other hand, in emerging economies and social situations, expanding and strengthening the production system of Japanese agriculture, ensuring stable supply of national food must be a fundamental policy for the long term of the country, and it is a very important policy issue in terms of effective use of the country and environmental conservation. We would like to express our gra for the following matters. Note 1: The amount of the farmland should be set up in consideration of the second phase of the re編ation of the rice field, the price of the farming product, and the refrigerated disaster of last year. 2 The taxation of the land is not carried out, and the farmland is taxed for the current purpose of agriculture, and the farmland is expected to continue the business. We will submit an opinion form according to the provisions of Article 99. 昭和 The proposed reason is to submit an opinion to government agencies as the request was adopted. --- --- --- ○President (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) In this case, I would like to add the first proposal to the schedule and assume the agenda. Is there any objection to this? 〔No objection〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) I acknowledge that it is no objection. Therefore, I decided to add the first proposal to the date and make the agenda. Schedule No.5 and Proposal No.1 are the agenda. We will ask the applicant to explain the reason for the proposal. Akizo Yamanoi 18 Thank you for your interest. [No.18 Akizo Yamano] ◆No.18 (Yamanoi Akizoku) The precious time, it is very horrible, but the report of the General Affairs Committee earlier is to propose a proposal to the request for the 45th農 land fixed asset tax. I think that the previous chairperson report is enough to guide you. Therefore, I would like to read the name of the protester, explain the outline, and thank you for your understanding. Submitted by Mr. Akizo Yamano, Mr. Hisao Takino, Masayuki Kokura, Mr. Shijiro Kawasaki, Seiichi Tatsusaki, Yoshio Uchi, Junhei Yokoi, Kazuyoshi Aihara, and Kiichi Takino. The description and contents of the意見 land fixed asset tax are as indicated in the document. In項 with paragraphs 1 and 2, this proposal is intended to submit opinions to government agencies as soon as the application has been adopted as we have been accepted earlier. Thank you for your understanding. [No.18 Akizo Yamanoi altar] ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) This is more questionable. Are there any questions? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) I acknowledge that there is no objection. Q&A Thank you for your understanding. I would like to omit the boarding fee according to Article 37 of the Conference Rules. Is there any objection to this? 〔No objection〕 ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) I acknowledge that it is no objection. Therefore, I decided to omit the boarding of the proposal No.1. More discussions. Sorry, this entry is only available in Japanese. Is there any discussion? [There is a person called "None"] ○Chair (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) I acknowledge that there is no discussion. This will end the discussion. The first proposal will be issued. This plan requires you to decide according to the original plan. 〔Priorship〕 ○The chairperson (Keiyoshi Kawamoto) is all standing. Therefore, the first proposal was accepted as the original proposal. All proceedings for this meeting have been closed. --- --- --- △ ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) In this case, there is a offer that you want to greet from you, so we will forgive it. Takayoshi Yoshino Thank you for your interest. 〔 Takakuni Yoshino〕 ◎ Thank you very much for your opinion until the deadline is too big. It is a time when the executive department must make efforts in response to this so-called financial background that has become a time to do. I think that you should say that the crisis of the local era, but I would like to express my opinions of the Sept. parliament because of the careful deliberation and the spiritual business that we have received. Thank you very much. (Applause) 〔 Takashi Yoshino altar〕------ Close ○Chair (Koshiyoshi Kawamoto) We will close the third regular meeting of Narashino City Council in 56. 6:32 p.m. Closing, signed by the provisions of Article 123, Paragraph 2 of the Local Autonomous Law. 川本基義